Overlapping Mental Representations of Self,In-Group,and Partner: Further Response Time Evidence and a Connectionist Model

Abstract

People’s reports on their own characteristics are facilitated by matches with their relationship partner’s or in-group’s perceived characteristics and inhibited by mismatches. These results suggest that mental representations of the self, partner, and in-groups overlap. A previously untested implication is that judgmental facilitation or inhibition should operate in the reverse direction as well. The authors find that reports on the characteristics of a relationship partner or in-group are facilitated or inhibited by matches or mismatches with the participant’s own characteristics. The size of the effect for the partner is linearly related to perceived relationship closeness. These findings, in combination with the previous ones, suggest that representations of self, other people, and social groups are constructed on-line rather than being stable, static entities, and the authors advance a connectionist model of this construction process.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aron, A. , Aron, E. N. , & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.

Aron, A. , Aron, E. N. , Tudor, M. , & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241-253.

Barsalou, L. (1987). The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development (pp. 101-140). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.

Brewer, M. B. , & Pickett, C. L. (in press). Distinctiveness motives as a source of the social self. In T. Tyler , R. Kramer , & O. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social self. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cohen, J. , & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Jonides, J. , & Mack, R. (1984). On the cost and benefit of cost and benefit. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 29-44.

Kunda, Z. , & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284-308.

Markus, H. , & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337.

10.

McClelland, J. L. , & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.

11.

Smith, E. R. (1996). What do connectionism and social psychology offer each other? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 893-912.

12.

Smith, E. R. (1998). Mental representation and memory. In D. Gilbert , S. Fiske , & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 391-445). New York: McGraw-Hill.

13.

Smith, E. R. , Coats, S. , & Walling, D. (1997). Correlations of RT facilitation effects with scales measuring group identification. Unpublished data, Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University.

14.

Smith, E. R. , & Henry, S. (1996). An in-group becomes part of the self: Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 635-642.

15.

Srull, T. , & Gaelick, L. (1983). General principles and individual differences in the self as a habitual reference point: An examination of self-other judgments of similarity. Social Cognition, 2, 108-121.

16.

Turner, J. C. , Hogg, M. A. , Oakes, P. J. , Reicher, S. D. , & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Basil Blackwell, Inc.

17.

Turner, J. C. , Oakes, P. J. , Haslam, S. A. , & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463.

18.

Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.

19.

Wyer, R. S. , & Srull, T. K. (1989). Memory and cognition in its social context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.