This study examined whether accounts about individuals in concrete situations—read as news or fiction—influenced judgments about society at large. Participants (N = 95) read either no story or one of two anecdotal accounts about a teenager who was planning to drop out of high school. Whereas one account focused on problems stemming from the student’s inner-city high school, the other account emphasized the boy’s emotional and motivational problems. Results showed that both news and fictional stories influenced participants’ judgments about the causes of and solutions to the dropout problem in the United States (causal generalization) and about the urgency with which policy makers should attend to educational and health care reform (agenda setting). Among the mechanisms shown to facilitate causal generalization was the extent to which the accounts cued remindings from the readers’ stores of personal or mediabased experience. The role of stories in the judgment of social issues is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Black, J. B. , & Seifert, C. M. (1985). The psychological study of story understanding. In C. R. Cooper (Ed.), Researching response to literature and the teaching of literature (pp. 190-211). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
2.
Bodenhausen, G. , Schwarz, N., Bless, H., & Waenke, M. (1995). Effects of atypical exemplars on racial beliefs: Enlightened racism or generalized appraisals?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 48-63.
3.
Bower, G. H. (1978). Experiments on story comprehension and recall. Discourse Processes, 1, 211-231.
4.
Cacioppo, J. T. , & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
5.
Cappella, J. N. , & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Curran, J. (1996). Mass media and democracy revisited. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 81-119). London: Arnold.
7.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.
8.
Gentner, D. , Rattermann, M. J., & Forbus, K. D. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 524-575.
9.
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
Gerrig, R. J. , & Prentice, D. A. (1991). The representation of fictional information. Psychological Science, 2, 336-340.
11.
Gibson, R. , & Zillmann, D. (1994). Exaggerated versus representative exemplification in news reports: Perception of issues and personal consequences. Communication Research, 21, 603-624.
12.
Goetz, E. T. , Sadoski, M., Stowe, M. L., Fetsco, T. G., & Kemp, S. G. (1993). Imagery and emotional response in reading literary text: Quantitative and qualitative analyses. Poetics, 22, 35-49.
13.
Green, M. C. , & Brock, T. C. (1996). Mechanisms of narrative persuasion. International Journal of Psychology, 31(3 & 4), 31.
14.
Hamill, R. , Wilson, T. D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1980). Insensitivity to sample bias: Generalizing from atypical cases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 578-589.
15.
Hawkins, R. P. , Pingree, S., Fitzpatrick, M. A.Thompson, M., & Bauman, I. (1991). Implications of concurrent measures of viewer behavior. Human Communication Research, 17, 485-504.
16.
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford.
17.
Iyengar, S. (1990). Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty. Political Behavior, 12, 19-40.
18.
Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Iyengar, S. , & Kinder, D. (1987). News that matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Kahneman, D. , & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
21.
Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
22.
Larsen, S. , & Laszlo, J. (1990). Cultural historical knowledge and personal experience in appreciation of literature. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 425-440.
23.
Larsen, S. , & Seilman, U. (1988). Personal remindings while reading literature. Text, 8, 411-429.
24.
Lippmann, W. (1965). Public opinion. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1922)
25.
Lord, C. G. , Lepper, M., & Mackie, D. (1984). Attitude prototypes as determinants of attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1254-1266.
26.
Moore, D. W. (1995). Crime Legislation, deficit reduction, top public’s “wish list.”Gallup Poll Monthly, 352, 2-5.
27.
Murphy, S. T. (1998). The impact of factual versus fictional media portrayals on cultural stereotypes. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 560 [special issue], 165-178.
28.
Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a book. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29.
Price, V. , & Czilli, E. J. (1996). Modeling patterns of news recognition and recall. Journal of Communication, 46, 55-78.
30.
Read, S. J. (1983). Once is enough: Causal reasoning from a single instance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 323-334.
31.
Read, S. J. , & Cesa, I. L. (1991). This reminds me of the time when... Expectation failures in reminding and explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 1-25.
32.
Rholes, W. S. , & Pryor, J. B. (1982). Cognitive accessibility and causal attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 719-727.
33.
Ross, B. H. , & Bradshaw, G. L. (1994). Encoding effects of remindings. Memory & Cognition, 22, 591-605.
34.
Rubin, Z. , & Peplau, A. (1975). Who believes in a just world?Journal of Social Issues, 31, 65-89.
35.
Rucinski, D. (1992). Personalized bias in news: The potency of the particular?Communication Research, 19, 91-108.
36.
Schank, R. C. , & Abelson, R. P. (1995). Knowledge and memory: The real story. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition: Vol. 8. Knowledge and memory: The real story (pp. 1-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Schiefele, U. (1990). Thematishes Interesse, Variablen des Leseprozesses und Textverstehen [Thematic interest, reading processes, and text understanding]. Zeitschrift fuer experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 37, 304-332.
38.
Schwartz, N. , & Bless, H. (1992). Constructing reality and its alternatives: An inclusion/exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 217-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
Shaklee, H. , & Fischhoff, B. (1982). Strategies of information search in causal analysis. Memory & Cognition, 10, 520-530.
40.
Simon, H. A. (1987). Politics as information processing. L.S.E. Quarterly, 1, 345-370.
41.
Slater, M. D. (1990). Processing social information in messages. Communication Research, 17, 327-343.
42.
Smith, E. R. (1992). The role of exemplars in social judgment. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 107-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Strange, J. (1993). The facts of fiction: The accommodation of realworld beliefs to fabricated accounts. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54(2-A), 358.
44.
Strange, J. (1996). Leben in Bildschirmwelten—Formen der narrativen Involviertheit [Varieties of narrative engagement]. In P. Voderer (Ed.), Fernsehen als “Beziehungskiste”: Parasoziale Beziehungen und Interaktionen mit TV-Personen. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
45.
Strange, J. , Black, J. B., & Ottaviani, B. (1990). Readers as vicarious actors: Imagined point of view and causal inference in narrative understanding. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
46.
Thompson, M. , Pingree, S., Hawkins, R. P., & Draves, C. (1991). Longterm norms and cognitive structures as shapers of television viewer activity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 35, 319-334.
47.
Tourangeau, R. , & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 299-314.
48.
Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.
49.
Wharton, C. M. , Holyoak, K. J., & Lange, T. E. (1996). Remote analogical reminding. Memory & Cognition, 24, 629-643.
50.
Williams, C. W. (1993). The effect of priming causal dimensional categories on social judgments. Social Cognition, 11, 223-242.
51.
Wilson, T. D. , & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 117-142.
52.
Wilson, T. D. , & Hodges, S. D. (1992). Attitudes as temporary constructions. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 37-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
Wu, C. , & Shaffer, D. R. (1987). Susceptibility to persuasive appeals as a function of source credibility and prior experience with the attitude object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 677-688.
