The relationship between dispositional need for cognitive closure (NFC) and the use of heuristics in negotiation was investigated. In Study 1 (N = 147), negotiators with high NFC were more influenced by focal points when setting limits and making concessions than were negotiators with low NFC. In Study 2 (N = 74), negotiators with high NFC were more influenced by stereotypic information when making concessions than were negotiators with low NFC. Study 3 examined whether results could be attributed to a correlation between NFC and social value orientation—the dispositional tendency to approach the negotation in a prosocial or more selfish way. In three different samples, no such relationship was found. The use of heuristics in negotiation is moderated by need for cognitive closure, and this effect is most likely due to the fact that negotiators with low need for closure are less likely to seize and freeze on information.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abelson, R. P. (1997). On the surprising longevity of flogged horses: Why there is a case for the significance test. Psychological Science, 8, 12-15.
2.
Carnevale, P. J. , & Probst, T. (1997). Good news about competitive people. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations (pp. 129-146). London: Sage.
3.
Carnevale, P. J. , & Pruitt, D. G. (1992). Negotiation and mediation. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 531-582.
4.
Chaiken, S. , Eagly, A. H., & Liberman, A. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford.
5.
Comrey, D. , & Lee, S. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Cortina, J. M. , & Dunlap, W. P. (1997). On the logic and purpose of significance testing. Psychological Methods, 2, 161-172.
7.
de Dreu, C. K. W. , & Koole, S. (1997). Motivated use of heuristics in negotiation. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam.
8.
de Dreu, C. K. W. , & McCusker, C. (1997). Gain-loss frames and cooperation in two-person social dilemmas: A transformational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1093-1106.
9.
de Dreu, C. K. W. , & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1995). Impact of social value orientation on negotiator cognition and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1177-1188.
10.
de Dreu, C. K. W. , Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J.-Ph. (1995). Dilution of stereotype-based cooperation in mixed-motive interdependence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 575-593.
11.
Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
Eagly, A. , & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes: New York: Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich.
13.
Estes, W. K. (1997). Significance testing in psychological research: Some persisting issues. Psychological Science, 8, 18-20.
14.
Ferguson, E. D. , & Schmitt, S. (1988). Gender-linked stereotypes and motivation affect performance in the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 703-714.
15.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
16.
Fisher, R. , & Ertel, D. (1995). Getting ready to negotiate. New York: Penguin.
17.
Fiske, S. T. , & Taylor, S. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107-128.
19.
Hedges, L. V. , & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20.
Hilty, J. A. , & Carnevale, P. J. D. (1993). Black-hat/white-hat strategy in bilateral negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 444-469.
21.
Hunter, J. (1997). Needed: A ban on the significance test. Psychological Science, 8, 3-7.
22.
Johnson, B. T. (1993). DSTAT: Software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
Kruglanski, A. W. , & Ajzen, I. (1983). Bias and error in human judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 1-44.
24.
Kruglanski, A. W. , Atash, A. N., De Grada, E., Mannetti, L., Peirro, A., & Webster, D. M. (1997). Psychological theory testing versus psychometric nay-saying: Comment on Neuberg et al.’s (1997) critique of the Need for Closure Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1005-1016.
25.
Kruglanski, A. W. , & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing and freezing.”Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.
26.
Kuhlman, D. M. , Camac, C., & Cunha, D. A. (1986). Individual differences in social orientation. In H. Wilke, D. Messick, & C. Rutte (Eds.), Experimental social dilemmas (pp. 151-176). New York: Verlag Peter Lang.
27.
Kuhlman, D. M. , & Marshello, A. (1975). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategic effects in prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 922-931.
28.
Lax, D. , & Sebenius, J. (1986). The manager as negotiator: Cooperating for competitive gain. New York: Free Press.
29.
Liebrand, W. B. G. , & Van Run, G. (1985). The effects of social motives across two cultures on behavior in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 86-102.
30.
Macrae, N. , Milne, A. B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1994). Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek into the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 37-47.
31.
Mayseless, O. , & Kruglanski, A. W. (1987). What makes you so sure? Effects of epistemic motivations on judgmental confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 162-183.
32.
McClintock, C. (1976). Social motivations in settings of outcome interdependence. In D. Druckman (Ed.), Negotiations: Social psychological perspective (pp. 49-77). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33.
Messick, D. M. , & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational basis of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25.
34.
Neale, M. A. , & Bazerman, M. H. (1991). Rationality and cognition in negotiation. New York: Free Press.
35.
Neuberg, S. , Judice, N. T., & West, S. (1997). What the need for closure scale measures and what it does not: Toward differentiating among related epistemic motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1396-1412.
36.
Northcraft, G. B. , & Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 84-97.
37.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric measures (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.
Olekalns, M. , Smith, P., & Kibby, R. (1996). Social value orientation and negotiator outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 299-314.
39.
Petty, R. E. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
40.
Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic Press.
41.
Pruitt, D. G. (1990). Problem solving and cognitive bias in negotiation: A commentary. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 2, 117-122.
42.
Pruitt, D. G. , & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. London: Open University Press.
43.
Rosenthal, R. , & Rosnow, R. (1984). Essentials of behavioral research. New York: McGraw-Hill.
44.
Rubin, J. , & Brown, R. (1975). Social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press.
45.
Rubin, J. , Pruitt, D. G., & Kim, S. (1994). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York: McGraw-Hill.
46.
Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115-129.
48.
Sorrentino, R. M. , Bobocel, D. R., Gitta, M. Z., Olson, J. M., & Hewitt, E. C. (1988). Uncertainty orientation and persuasion: Individual differences in the effects of personal relevance on social judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 357-371.
49.
Sorrentino, R. M. , & Short, J. C. (1986). Uncertainty orientation, motivation, and cognition. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 379-403). New York: Guilford.
50.
Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 331-376). New York: Academic Press.
51.
Thompson, L. (1990). Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 515-532.
52.
Thompson, M. M. , Naccarato, M. E., & Parker, K. H. (1992). Measuring cognitive needs: The development and validation of the Personal Need for Structure (PNS) and Personal Fear of Invalidity (PFI) measures. Unpublished manuscript, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
53.
Van Lange, P. A. M. , & Kuhlman, M. D. (1994). Social value orientations and impressions of partner’s honesty and intelligence: A test of might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 126-141.
54.
Webster, D. , & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
55.
Yukl, G. (1974). Effects of situational variables and opponent concessions on a bargainer’s perceptions, aspirations, and concessions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 227-236.
