In each of two experiments, some participants chose between allocation of resources to the group as a whole or to themselves alone (egoism condition); some chose between allocation to a group or to a group member for whom they were induced to feel empathy (altruism condition); and some chose between allocation to a group or to a member for whom empathy was not induced (baseline condition). When the decision was private, allocation to the group was significantly—and similarly—lower in the egoism and altruism conditions compared to the baseline. When the decision was public, allocation to the group was significantly lower only in the altruism condition. These results indicated, first, that both egoism and altruism can be potent threats to the common good and, second, that anticipated social evaluation is a powerful inhibitor of the egoistic but not the altruistic threat.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 65-122). New York: Academic Press.
2.
Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Batson, C. D. (1994). Why act for the public good?: Four answers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 603-610.
4.
Batson, C. D. , Batson, J. G., Todd, R. M., Brummett, B. H., Shaw, L. L., & Aldeguer, C. M. R. (1995). Empathy and the collective good: Caring for one of the others in a social dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 619-631.
5.
Batson, C. D. , Klein, T. R., Highberger, L., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: When compassion and justice conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1042-1054.
6.
Batson, C. D. , O’Quin, K., Fultz, J., Vanderplas, M.,& Isen, A. M. (1983). Self-reported distress and empathy and egoistic versus altruistic motivation for helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 706-718.
7.
Bishop, Y. M. M. , Feinberg, S. E., & Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
Bixenstein, V. E. , Levitt, C. A., & Wilson, K. R. (1966). Collaboration among six persons in a prisoner’s dilemma game. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 10, 488-496.
9.
Bonacich, P. (1972). Norms and cohesion as adaptive responses to political conflict: An experimental study. Sociometry, 35, 357-375.
10.
Brewer, M. B. , & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543-549.
11.
Coke, J. S. , Batson, C. D., & McDavis, K. (1978). Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 752-766.
12.
Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
13.
Dawes, R. M. , McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people’s behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 1-11.
14.
Dawes, R. , van de Kragt, A. J. C., & Orbell, J. M. (1990). Cooperation for the benefit of us—not me, or my conscience. In J. J. Mansbridge (Ed.), Beyond self-interest (pp. 97-110). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Hardin, G. (1977). The limits of altruism: An ecologist’s view of survival. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
16.
Jones, E. E. , & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 231-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Kant, I. (1898). Fundamental principles of the metaphysic of morals. Kant’s critique of practical reason and other works on the theory of ethics (4th ed., T. K. Abbott, Trans.). New York: Longmans, Green. (Original work published 1785)
18.
Kelley, H. H. , & Grzelak, J. (1972). Conflict between individual and group interest in an n-person relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 190-197.
19.
Kerr, N. L. (1995). Norms in social dilemmas. In D. A. Schroeder (Ed.), Social dilemmas: Perspectives on individuals and groups (pp. 31-47). Westport, CT: Praeger.
20.
Komorita, S. A. , Sweeney, J., & Kravitz, D. A. (1980). Cooperative choice in the N-person dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 504-516.
21.
Messick, D. M. , & Brewer, M. B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. In L. Wheeler & P. Shaver (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 11-44). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
Nagel, T. (1991). Equality and partiality. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Oliner, P. M. , Oliner, S. P., Baron, L., Blum, L. A., Krebs, D. L., & Smolenska, M. Z. (1992). Embracing the other: Philosophical, psychological, and historical perspectives on altruism. New York: New York University Press.
24.
Oliner, S. P. , & Oliner, P. M. (1988). The altruistic personality: Rescuers of Jews in Nazi Europe. New York: Free Press.
25.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Schroeder, D. A. (Ed.). (1995). Social dilemmas: Perspectives on individuals and groups. Westport, CT: Praeger.
27.
Stotland, E. (1969). Exploratory investigations of empathy. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 271-313). New York: Academic Press.
28.
Wallach, M. A. , & Wallach, L. (1983). Psychology’s sanction for selfishness: The error of egoism in theory and therapy. San Francisco: Freeman.
29.
Wickens, T. D. (1989). Multiway contingency tables analysis for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Yamagishi, T. , & Sato, K. (1986). Motivational bases of the public goods problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 67-73.
