Male and female undergraduates (N = 316) completed affective, cognitive, and global evaluations of alcohol and marijuana use. The discriminant validity of the attitude components was supported. As predicted, relationships between global attitude and the affective component varied across use experience groups; for both drugs, the affective component was more related to the global scale among the most experienced users. Attitude components predicted current marijuana use in a manner that was consistent with the analyses of attitude structure. However, the affective and cognitive attitude scales were relatively poor predictors of current alcohol use, suggesting that additional information may contribute to global attitude for alcohol use. Thus, similarities on attitude structure emerged across drugs, but the ability of the attitude components to predict use behavior differentiated the drug types.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ajzen, I. (1989). Attitude structure and behavior. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 241-274). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Ajzen, I. , & Driver, B. L. (1991). Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences, 13(3), 185-204.
3.
Breckler, S. J. , & Wiggins, E. C. (1989). Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 253-271.
4.
Breckler, S.J. , & Wiggins, E. C. (1993). Emotional responses and the affective component of attitude. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 281-296.
5.
Brook, U. (1993). High school pupils' attitude and experience with drugs in Holon, Israel. International Journal of the Addictions, 28, 667-676.
6.
Brown, S. A. , Goldman, M. S., Inn, A., & Anderson, L. R. (1980). Expectations of reinforcement from alcohol: Their domain and relation to drinking patterns. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 419-426.
7.
Carey, K. B. (1995). Heavy drinking contexts and indices of problem drinking among college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 56, 287-292.
8.
Carey, K. B. , & Correia, C.J. (1997). Drinking motives predict alcohol-related problems in college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58, 100-105.
9.
Cook, M. P. , Lounsbury,J. W., & Fontenelle, G. A. (1980). An application of Fishbein and Ajzen's attitudes-subjective norms model to the study of drug use. Journal of Social Psychology, 110, 193-201.
10.
Cooper, M. L. (1994). Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: Development and validation of a four-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 6, 117-128.
11.
Crites, S. L. , Fabrigar, L. R, & Petty, R. E. (1994). Measuring the affective and cognitive properties of attitudes: Conceptual and methodological issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 619-634.
12.
Cummings, N. A. , Gordon,J., & Marlatt, G. A. (1980). Relapse: Strategies of prevention and prediction. In W. R. Miller (Ed.), The addictive behaviors (pp. 291-321). Oxford, UKPergamon.
13.
Eagly, A. H. , & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York: Harcourt Brace.
14.
Eagly, A. H. , Mladinic, A., & Otto, S. (1994). Cognitive and affective bases of attitudes toward social groups and social policies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 113-137.
15.
Esses, V. M. , Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1993). Values, stereotypes, and emotions as determinants of inter-group attitudes. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group processes (pp. 137-166). New York: Academic Press.
16.
Fabian,W. D. , & Fishkin, S. M. (1991). Psychological absorption: Affect investment in marijuana intoxication. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 179, 3943.
17.
Fishbein, M. (1980). A theory of reasoned action: Some applications and implications. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation1979,27,65-116.
18.
Fishbein, M. , & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19.
Gardner, E. L. , & Lowinson,J. H. (1991). Marijuana's interaction with brain reward systems: Update 1991: Special issue: Pharmacological, chemical, biochemical, and behavioral research on cannabis and the cannabinoids. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 40, 571-580.
20.
Grube, J. W. , & Morgan, M. (1990). Attitude-social support interactions: Contingent consistency effects in the prediction of adolescent smoking, drinking, and drug use. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 329-339.
21.
Hays, R. D. , & Huba, G.J. (1988). Reliability and validity of drug use items differing in the nature of their response options. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 470-472.
22.
Johnston, L. D. , O'Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (1994). National survey results on drug use from the monitoring the future study, 1975-1993 v.2 college students and young adults (NIH Publication No. 94-3810, pp. 160-164). Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
23.
Kandel, D. (1975). The measurement of "ever use" and "frequency-quantity" in drug use surveys. In J. Elison & D. Nurco (Eds.), Operational definitions in sociobehavioral drug use research, 1975 (pp. 27-35). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
24.
Kay, R. H. (1993). An exploration of theoretical and practical foundations for assessing attitudes toward computers: The Computer Attitude Measure (CAM). Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 371-386.
25.
Mathew, R.J. , & Wilson, W. H. (1993). Acute changes in cerebral blood flow after smoking marijuana. Life Sciences, 5Z757-767.
26.
Meng, X. , Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172-175.
27.
Millar, M. G. , & Tesser, A. (1989). The effects of affective-cognitive consistency and thought on the attitude-behavior relation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 189-202.
28.
Mischel, W. , & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
29.
Newcomb, M. D. , Chou, C., Bentler, P. M., & Huba, G. J. (1988). Cognitive motivations for drug use among adolescents: Longitudinal tests of gender differences and predictors of change in drug use. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 426-438.
30.
Schafer, J. , & Brown, S. A. (1991). Marijuana and cocaine effect expectancies and drug use patterns. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 558-565.
31.
Simons, J. (1997). Affect dysregulation: A theoretical framework for vulnerability to marijuana use. Unpublished manuscript, Syracuse University, New York.
32.
Towberman, D. B. , & McDonald, R. M. (1993). Dimensions of adolescent drug-avoidant attitude. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment410, 45-52.
33.
Wechsler, H. , & Isaac, N. (1992). "Binge" drinkers at Massachusetts Colleges. Journal of the America Medical Association, 267, 2929-2931.
34.
Wilson, W. H. , Ellinwood, E. H., Mathew, RJ., & Johnson, K. (1994). Effects of marijuana on performance of a computerized cognitive neuromotor test battery. Psychiatry Research, 51, 115-125.
35.
Woody, G. E. , Urschell, H. C. III, & Allerman, A. (1992). The many paths to drug dependence. In M. Glantz & R. Pickens (Eds.), Vulnerability to drug abuse (pp. 491-507). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
36.
Zastowny, T. R. , Adams, E. H., Black, G. S., Lawton, K. B., & Wilder, A. L. (1993). Sociodemographic and attitudinal correlates of alcohol and other drug use among children and adolescents: Analysis of a large-scale attitude tracking study. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 25, 223-237.
