Both classic and contemporary models of causal reasoning suggest that we retrieve examples of an actor's past behavior from memory when explaining his or her current behavior. A variety of other research suggests that we rely on abstract trait knowledge rather than on behavioral exemplars when making such judgments. The authors conducted three experiments that examined which type of information (abstract trait knowledge or behavioral exemplars) was spontaneously used during causal reasoning when both types of information were available. Results indicated that although abstract trait knowledge generally served as the basis for causal judgments, behavioral exemplars were used if they were easily accessible and participants were motivated to engage in effortful processing. The authors discuss how the use of abstract traits versus behavioral exemplars may serve to maintain or alter existing person impressions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, N. H. (1989). Functional memory and on-line attribution. In J. N. Bassili (Ed.), On-line cognition in person perception (pp. 175-220). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Asch. S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 1230-1240.
3.
Bell, L. G. , Wicklund, R. A., Manko, G., & Larkin, C. (1976). When unexpected behavior is attributed to the environment. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 316-327.
4.
Carlston, D. E. (1980). The recall and use of traits and events in social inference processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 303-328.
5.
Carlston, D. E. (1994). Associated systems theory: A systematic approach to cognitive representations of persons. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 7, pp. 1-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Carlston, D. E. , & Skowronski, J.J. (1986). Trait memory and behavior memory: The effects of alternative pathways on impression judgment response times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 5-13.
7.
Crocker, J. , Hannah, D. G., & Weber, R. (1983). Person memory and causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 55-66.
8.
Dreben, E. K. , Fiske, S. T., & Hastie, R. (1979). The independence of evaluative and item information: Impression and recall order effects in behavior-based impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1758-1768.
9.
Fiske, S. T. , & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic Press.
10.
Fuhrman, R. W. , Bodenhausen, G. V., & Lichtenstein, M. (1989). On the trait implications of social behaviors: Kindness, intelligence, goodness, and normality ratings for 400 behavior statements. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 21, 587-597.
11.
Garland, H. , Hardy, A., & Stephenson, L. (1975). Information search as affected by attribution type and response category. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 612-615.
12.
Gilbert, D. T. , Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733-739.
13.
Hastie, R. (I1980). Memory for behavioral information that confirms or contradicts a personality impression. In R. Hastie, T. M. Ostrom, E. B. Ebbesen, R. S. Wyer, Jr., D. L. Hamilton, & D. E. Carlston (Eds.), Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception (pp. 155-178). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Hastie, R. (1984). Causes and effects of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 44-56.
15.
Hastie, R. , & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268.
16.
Hilton, D.J. , & Slugoski, B. R. (1986). Knowledge-based causal attribution: The abnormal conditions focus model. Psychological Review, 93, 75-88.
17.
Hilton, D. J. , Smith, R. H., & Alicke, M. D. (1988). Knowledge-based information acquisition: Norms and the functions of consensus information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 530-540.
18.
Jones, E. E. , & McGillis, D. (1976). Correspondent inferences and the attribution cube: A comparative reappraisal. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 389-420). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192-240). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
20.
Klein, S. B. , & Loftus, J. (1993). Behavioral experience and trait judgments about the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 740-745.
21.
Klein, S. B. , Loftus, J., Trafton, J. G., & Fuhrman, R. W. (1992). The use of exemplars and abstractions in trait judgments: A model of trait knowledge about the self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 739-753.
22.
Lau, R. R. , & Russell, D. (1980). Attribution in the sports pages: A field test of some current hypotheses in attribution research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 29-38.
23.
Major, B. (1980). Information acquisition and attribution processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1010-1024.
24.
McArthur, L. Z. (1972). The how and what of why: Some determinants and consequences of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 171-193.
25.
McArthur, L. Z. (1981). What grabs you? The role of attention in impression formation and causal attribution. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 201-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Nisbett, R. E. , Zukier, H., & Lemley, R. E. (1981). The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic information. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 248-277.
27.
Orvis, B. R. , Cunningham, J. D., & Kelley, H. H. (1975). A closer examination of causal inference: The roles of consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 605-616.
28.
Pruitt, D. G. , & Insko, C. A. (1980). Extension of the Kelley attribution model: The role of comparison-object consensus, target-object consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 39-58.
29.
Pyszczynski, T. A. , & Greenberg, J. (1981). Role of disconfirmed expectancies in the instigation of attributional processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 31-38.
30.
Reeder, G. D. , & Coovert, M. D. (1986). Revising an impression of morality. Social Cognition, 4, 1-17.
31.
Sears, D. O. (1983). The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 233-240.
32.
Sherman, J. W. , & Klein, S. B. (1994). Development and representation of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 972-983.
33.
Taylor, S. E. , & Fiske, S. T. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 249-288). New York: Academic Press.
34.
Taylor, S. E. , & Koivumaki, J. H. (1976). The perception of self and others: Acquaintanceship, affect, and actor-observer differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 403-408.
35.
Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93, 239-257.
36.
Trope, Y. , Cohen, O., & Alfieri, T. (1991). Behavior identification as a mediator of dispositional inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 873-883.
37.
Trope, Y. , & Liberman, A. (1993). The use of trait conceptions to identify other people's behavior and to draw inferences about their personalities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 553-562.
38.
Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
39.
Weisz, C. , & Jones, E. E. (1993). Expectancy disconfirmation and dispositional inference: Latent strength of target-based and category-based expectancies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 563-573.
40.
Wyer, R. S. , & Carlston, D. (1979). Social cognition, inference, and attribution. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
Wyer, R. S. , & Srull, T. K. (1989). Memory and cognition in its social context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
