This experiment explored the joint impact of accountability, anger, and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Participants were either accountable or anonymous while watching an anger-priming or a neutral-emotion-priming video clip. In an ostensibly separate study, participants also were either accountable or anonymous while determining responsibility and punishment in fictional tort cases. As predicted, priming anger both simplified cognitive processing(i.e., reduced the number of cues used in making judgments) and amplified the carryover of self-reported anger to punitive attributions and actual punishment. By contrast, accountability increased the complexity of the judgment process and attenuated the carryover of anger to attributions and punishment. These results generalized across four replication cases that varied in story content; degree of defendant intentionality; and target, type, and severity of harm.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adelberg, S. , & Batson, C. D. (1978). Accountability and helping: When needs exceed resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 343-350.
2.
Alexander, C. N. , Langer, E. J., Newman, R. I., Chandler, H. M., & Davies, J. L. (1989). Transcendental meditation, mindfulness, and longevity: An experimental study with the elderly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 950-964.
3.
Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of m: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Averill, J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression. American Psychologist, 38, 1145-1160.
5.
Berkowitz, L. (1990). On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression: A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis. American Psychologist, 45, 494-503. (American Psychological Association: Distinguished Scientific Award for the Applications of Psychology address)
6.
Berkowitz, L. , & Troccoli, B. T. (1990). Feelings, direction of attention, and expressed evaluation of others. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 305-325.
7.
Betancourt, H. , & Blair, I. (1992). A cognition (attribution)-emotion model of violence in conflict situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 343-350.
8.
Bodenhausen, G. V. (1993). Emotions, arousal, and stereotypic judgments: Aheuristic model of affect and stereotyping. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 13-37). San Diego: Academic Press.
9.
Bodenhausen, G. V. , Kramer, G. P., & Sussser, K. (1994). Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 621-632.
10.
Bodenhausen, G. , Sheppard, L., & Kramer, G. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment The different impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 45-62.
11.
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 111-120.
12.
Cialdini, R. B. , Levy, A., Herman, C. P., & Evenbeck, S. (1973). Attitudinal politics: The strategy of moderation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 100-108.
13.
Clore, G. L. , Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 323-417). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press. (Originally published in 1893)
15.
Erber, R. , Wegner, D. M., & Therriault, N. (1996). On being cool and collected: Mood regulation in anticipation of social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 757-766.
16.
Fincham, F. D. , & Jaspars, J. M. (1980). Attribution of responsibility: From man the scientist to man as lawyer. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 81-138.
17.
Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model(AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39-66.
18.
Gilbert, D. T. , & Osborne, R. E. (1989). Thinking backward: Some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 940-949.
19.
Griffitt, W. , & Garcia, L. T. (1979). Reversing authoritarian punitiveness: The impact of verbal conditioning. Social Psychology Quarterly, 4Z55-61.
20.
Gross,J.J. , & Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotion elicitation using films. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 87-108.
21.
Hagafors, R. , & Brehmer, B. (1983). Does having to justify one's judgments change the nature of the judgment process? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31, 223-232.
22.
Hamilton, V. L. (1978). Who is responsible? Toward a social psychology of responsibility attribution. Social Psychology, 41, 316-328.
23.
Hamilton, V. L. , & Sanders, J. (1981). The effect of roles and deeds on responsibility judgments: The normative structure of wrongdoing. Social Psychology Quarter(y, 44, 237-254.
24.
Jones, E. E. , & Wortman, C. (1973). Ingratiation: An attributional approach. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
25.
Keltner, D. , Ellsworth, P. C., & Edwards, K. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism: Effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 740-752.
26.
Keltner, D. , Locke, K. D., & Audrain, P. C. (1993). The influence of attributions on the relevance of negative feelings to personal satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 21-29.
27.
Klimoski, R. , & Inks, L. (1990). Accountability forces in performance appraisal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 194-208.
28.
Kruglanski, A. W. , & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468.
29.
Langer, E.J. (1989). Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness-mindfulness. In B. Leonard (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 137-173). San Diego: Academic Press.
30.
Lemerise, E. A. , & Dodge, K. A. (1993). The development of anger and hostile interactions. In M. Lewis &J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 537-546). New York: Guilford.
31.
Lerner,J. S. , & Tetlock, P. E. (1994). Accountability and social cognition. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 3098-3121). San Diego: Academic Press.
32.
Lerner,J. S. , & Tetlock, P. E. (in press). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin.
33.
Lerner, M. J. , & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030-1051.
34.
Linville, P. W. (1980). Polarized appraisals of out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 689-703.
35.
Linville, P. (1982). The complexity-extremity effect and age-based stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 193-211.
36.
McAllister, D. W. , Mitchell, T. R., & Beach, L. R. (1979). The contingency model for the selection of decision strategies: An empirical test of the effects of significance, accountability, and reversibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24, 228-244.
37.
Mero, N. , & Motowidlo, S. (1995). Effects of rater accountability on the accuracy and favorability of performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 517-524.
38.
Nemeth, C. , & Chiles, C. (1988). Modelling courage: The role of dissent in fostering independence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 275-280.
39.
Nemeth, C.J. , & Kwan, J. L. (1985). Originality of word associations as a function of majority vs. minority influence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 277-282.
40.
Peterson, B. E. , Doty, R. M., & Winter, D. G. (1993). Authoritarianism and attitudes toward contemporary social issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 174-184.
41.
Quigley, B. M. , & Tedeschi, J. T. (1996). Mediating effects of blame attributions on feelings of anger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1280-1288.
42.
Schlenker, B. R. , Britt, T. W., Pennington, J., Murphy, R., & Doherty, K. (1994). The triangle model of responsibility: A conceptualization and empirical test. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 632-652.
43.
Schwarz, N. , & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523.
44.
Schwarz, N. , & Clore, G. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 433-465). New York: Guilford.
45.
Semin, G. R. , & Manstead, A.S.R. (1983). The accountability of conduct: A social psychological analysis. New York: Academic Press.
46.
Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.
47.
Skitka, L. J. , & Tetlock, P. E. (1992). Allocating scarce resources: A contingency model of distributive justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 491-522.
48.
Skitka, L. J. , & Tetlock, P. E. (1993). Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1-19.
49.
Solomon, R. C. (1990). A passion for justice. Reading, MA.Addison-Wesley.
50.
Tedock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 74-83.
51.
Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 227-236.
52.
Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 819-827.
53.
Tetlock, P. E. (1991). An alternative metaphor in the study of judgment and choice: People as politicians. Theory and Psychology, 1, 451-475.
54.
Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 331-376.
55.
Tetlock, P. E. , & Kim, J. I. (1987). Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 700-709.
56.
Tetlock, P. E. , & Lerner, J. S. (in press). The social contingency model of judgment and choice: Multi-functional but still dual-process? In S. Chaiken &Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.
57.
Tetlock, P. E. , Peterson, R. S., & Lerner, J. S. (1996). Revising the value pluralism model: Incorporating social content and context postulates. In C. Seligman, J. Olson, & M. Zanna (Eds.), Values: Eighth annual Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology (pp. 25-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58.
Tedock, P. E. , Skitka, L., & Boettger, R. (1989). Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: Conformity, complexity, and bolstering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 632-640.
59.
Weiner, B. (1995).Judgments of responsibility. New York: Guilford.
60.
Weiner, B. , Folkes, V. S., Amirkhan, J., & Verette, J. A. (1987). An attributional analysis of excuse giving: Studies of a naive theory of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 316-324.
61.
Weiner, B. , Graham, S., & Chandler, C. (1982). Pity, anger, and guilt: An attributional analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 226-232.
62.
Wilson, T. D. , & Brekke, N. (1996). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 117-142.
