The assumption that Chinese tend to self-efface has mixed support in the scanty empirical literature. The conflicting findings may be attributable to measuring different domains in different studies. Therefore, we assessed self-enhancement across eight domains of person perception in a Hong Kong Chinese sample. Twenty-one groups of college students, after working together for 13 weeks on class projects, were asked to rate fellow group members on all eight domains. The degree of self-enhancement or self-effacement was determined by comparing self-ratings with mean peer ratings. Results showed an overall self-effacement effect, which was significant for five of eight personality dimensions. The exceptions were agentic traits such as Assertiveness, Openness to Experience, and Intellect. The overall rate of self-enhancers (43%) was substantially lower than the rate for a comparable North American sample (56%). Although those who self-enhanced most reported high self-esteem, they were not rated as better adjusted by their peers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alloy, L. B. , & Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General108, 441-485.
2.
Alloy, L. B. , & Ahrens, A. H. (1987). Depression and pessimism for the future: Biased use of statistically relevant information in predictions for self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5Z366-378.
3.
Beer, J. , & Robins, R. W. (1996, June 29-July 1). Consequences of self-enhancement bias: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at meeting of the American Psychological Society, San Francisco.
4.
Bond, M. H. (1991). Beyond the Chineseface: Insights from psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
5.
Bond, M. H. , Leung, K., & Wan, K. (1982). The social impact of self-effacing attributions: The Chinese case. Journal of Social Psychology, 118, 157-166.
6.
Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4, 353-376.
7.
Campbell, J. D. , & Fehr, B. (1990). Self-esteem and perceptions of conveyed impressions: Is negative affectivity associated with greater realism? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 122-133.
8.
Cheung, I.W.S. (1994). Exploring individual differences in self-perception personality and perceptions of sex-stereotypes. Unpublished bachelor's thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
9.
Colvin, C. R. , & Block, J. (1994). Do positive illusions foster mental health? An examination of the Taylor and Brown formulation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 3-20.
10.
Colvin, C. R. , Block, J., & Funder, D. C. (1995). Overly-positive self-evaluations and personality: Negative implications for mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1152-1162.
11.
Crocker, J. , Luhtanen, R., Blaine, B., & Broadnax, S. (1994). Collective self-esteem and psychological well-being among White, Black, and Asian college students. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 20, 503-513.
12.
Fahr, J. , Dobbins, G. H., & Cheng, B. (1991). Cultural relativity in action: A comparison of self-ratings made by Chinese and U. S. workers. Personnel Psychology, 44, 129-147.
13.
Falbo, T. , Poston, D. L., Jr., Triscari, R. S., & Zhang, X. (1997). Self-enhancing illusions among Chinese school children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 172-191.
14.
Funder, D. C. (1987). Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 75-90.
15.
John, O. P. (1990). The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford.
16.
John, O. P. , & Robins, R. W. (1994). Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 206-219.
17.
Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford.
18.
Kitayama, S. , Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1245-1267.
19.
Kwan, V.S.Y. , Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M. (1997). Pan cultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1035-1051.
20.
Lau, S. (1989). Sex role orientation and domains of self-esteem. Sex Roles, 21, 415-422.
21.
Leung, M. (1996). Social network and self enhancement in Chinese children: A comparison of self reports and peer reports of group membership. Social Development, 5, 146-157.
22.
Lewinsohn, P. M. , Mischel, W., Chaplin, W., & Barton, R. (1980). Social competence and depression: The role of illusory self-perceptions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89, 203-212.
23.
Luk, C. L. , & Bond, M. H. (1992). Explaining Chinese self-esteem in terms of the self-concept. Psychologia, 35, 147-154.
24.
Markus, H. R. , & Kitayama, S. (1991a). Cultural variation in the self-concept. In J. Strauss & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), The self: Inter disciplinary approaches (pp. 18-48). New York: Springer-Verlag.
25.
Markus, H. R. , & Kitayama, S. (1991b). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
26.
McCrae, R. R. , Yik, M.S.M., Trapnell, P. D., Bond, M. H., & Paulhus, D. L. (in press). Interpreting personality profiles across cultures: Bilingual, acculturation, and peer rating studies of Chinese undergraduates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
27.
Paulhus, D. L. (in press). Interpersonal vs. intrapsychic adeptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
28.
Paulhus, D. L. , & Bruce, M. N. (1992). The effect of acquaintanceship on the validity of personality impressions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 816-824.
29.
Paulhus, D. L. , & John, D. P. (in press). Egoistic and moralistic bias in self-perceptions: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality.
30.
Paulhus, D. L. , & Reynolds, S. R. (1995). Enhancing target variance in personality impressions: Highlighting the person in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1233-1242.
31.
Paulhus, D. L. , Yik, M.S.M., & Lysy, D. C. (1995). Self enhancement of Caucasians and Chinese in Canadian samples. Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
32.
Pye, L. (1982). Chinese commercial negotiating style. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
33.
Robins, R. W. , & John, O. P. (1997). The quest for self-insight: Theory and research on accuracy and bias in self-perceptions. In R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson, & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 649-679). New York: Academic Press.
34.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Ruehlman, L. S. , West, S. G., & Pasahow, R. J. (1985). Depression and evaluation schemata. Journal of Personality, 53, 46-92.
36.
Shrout, P. E. , & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
37.
Smith, P. B. , & Bond, M. H. (1994). Social psychology across cultures: Analysis and perspectives. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
38.
Taylor, S. E. (1989). Positive illusions: Creative self-deceptions and the healthy mind. New York: Basic Books.
39.
Taylor, S. E. , & Armor, D. A. (1996). Positive illusions and coping with adversity. Journal of Personality, 64, 873-898.
40.
Taylor, S. E. , & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
41.
Tseng, W. H. (1972). On Chinese national character from the viewpoint of personality development. In Y. Y. Li & K S. Yang (Eds.), Symposium on the character of the Chinese. Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica. (in Chinese)
42.
Yang, C. F. , & Chiu, C. Y. (1987). The dilemmas experienced by Chinese subjects: A critical review of their influence on the use of Western originated rating scales. Acta Psychologica Taiwanica, 29, 113-132. (in Chinese)
43.
Yang, K. S. (Ed.). (1988). Chinese people s psychology. Taipei: Gwei Gwan Tu Shu. (in Chinese)
44.
Yang, K. S. (1996). Psychological transformation of the Chinese people as a result of societal modernization. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 479-498). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
45.
Yik, M.S.M. , & Bond, M. H. (1993). Exploring the dimensions of Chinese person perception with indigenous and imported constructs: Creating a culturally balanced scale. International Journal of Psychology, 28, 75-95.
46.
Yik, M.S.M. , & Tang, C. S. (1996). Linking personality and values: The importance of a culturally relevant personality scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 767-774.
47.
Yu, J. , & Murphy, K. R. (1993) Modesty bias in self-ratings of performance: A test of the cultural relativity hypothesis. Personnel Psychology, 46, 357-363.
