Two studies examine how people's reactions to conflict resolution efforts by third parties are affected by whether the conflict occurs within or across cultural boundaries. Both test the social categorization hypothesis of the relational model of authority: that third party decisions will be evaluated more strongly through judgments about the treatment of disputants (relational concerns) in conflicts within groups and more strongly in terms of decisions favorability (instrumental concerns) in disputes across groups. The first study tests this hypothesis in a study of conflicts between American employees and their supervisors, whereas the second does so in a study of conflicts involving Japanese and Western teachers. The results of both studies support the predictions of the relational model. In both studies, relational concerns are more important in within-group disputes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bazerman, M. H. , & Neale, M. A. (1992). Negotiating rationally. New York: Free Press.
2.
Blalock, H. M. Jr. (1972). Social statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
Graham, J. L. (1993, April). The Japanese negotiation style: Characteristics of a distinct approach. Negotiation Journal, pp. 123-140.
4.
Hocker, J. L. , & Wilmot, W. W. (1991). Interpersonal conflict. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
5.
Huo, Y. J. , Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; is assimilation the answer?Psychological Science, 7, 40-45.
6.
Koper, G. , Knippenberg, D., Bouhuijs, F., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. (1993). Procedural fairness and self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 630-650.
7.
Leung, K. (1987). Some determinants of reactions to procedural models for conflict resolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 898-908.
8.
Leung, K. , & Lind, E. A. (1986). Procedural justice and culture: Effects of culture, gender, and investigator status on procedural preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1134-1140.
9.
Lind, E. A. (1994). Procedural justice and culture: Evidence for ubiquitous process concerns. Zeitschift für Rechtssoziologie, 15, 24-36.
10.
Lind, E. A. , Erickson, B. E., Friedland, N., & Dickenberger, M. (1978). Reactions to procedural models for adjudicative conflict resolution: A cross-national study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2Z318-341.
11.
Lind, E. A. , Kanfer, R., & Earley, C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
12.
Lind, E. A. , & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice&New York: Plenum.
13.
Lind, E. A. , Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 767-780.
14.
Ohbuchi, K. , Chiba, S., & Fukushima, O. (1994). Mitigation of interpersonal conflicts: Politeness and time pressure. Unpublished manuscript, Tohoku University.
15.
Ohbuchi, K. , & Takahashi, Y. (1994). Cultural styles of conflict. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1345-1366.
16.
Ohbuchi, K. , & Takama, K. (1991). Effectiveness of power strategies in interpersonal conflict among Japanese students. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 791-805.
17.
Shapiro, D. L. , & Brett, J. (1993). Comparing three processes underlying judgments of procedural justice: A field study of mediation and arbitration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1167-1177.
18.
Smith, H. J. , & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Justice and power: Can justice motivations and superordinate categorizations encourage the advantaged to support policies which redistribute economic resources and encourage the disadvantaged to willingly obey the law?European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 171-200.
19.
Smith, H. J. , Tyler, T. R., Huo, Y. J., Ortiz, D. J., & Lind, E. A. (1997). Group membership, self-esteem, and procedural justice. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.
20.
Thibaut, J. , & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Tung, R. L. (1982). China trade negotiations: Practices, procedures, and outcomes. Journal of International Business Studies, 13, 25-38.
22.
Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838.
23.
Tyler, T. R. , Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview.
24.
Tyler, T. R. , & Degoey, D. (1995). Collective restraint in a social dilemma situation: The influence of procedural justice and community identification on the empowerment and legitimacy of authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 482-497.
25.
Tyler, T. R. , Degoey, P., & Smith, H. J. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930.
26.
Tyler, T. R. , & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York: Academic Press.
27.
Tyler, T. R. , & Smith, H. J. (1997). Social justice and social movements. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 595-629). New York: McGraw-Hill.
28.
Tyler, T. R. , & Smith, H. J. (in press). Justice, social identity and group processes. In T. R. Tyler, O. John, & R. Kramer (Eds.), The psychology of the social selfHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Tyler, T. R. , Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1996). Member diversity and leadership effectiveness: Procedural justice, social identity, and group dynamics. Advances in Grou) Processes, 13, 33-66.
30.
Vermunt, R. , Wit, A., van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (1993, July). The effect of inaccurate procedure on protest: The mediating role of perceived unfairness and situational esteem. Paper presented at the fourth International Conference on Social Justice, Trier, Germany.
