Based on the notion that approach-avoidance underlies impression formation processes and that approach-avoidance is more directly based on appraisals of others' morality (M) than competence (C), we hypothesized that M-related information played a more important role at various phases of global impression formation than C-related information on target persons. In four studies (N = 342 university students), we predicted and found that (a) M traits showed a higher chronic accessibility than C traits; (b) when gathering information to formulate a global impression, perceivers were more interested in M traits than C traits; (c) global impressions of real persons were better predicted from M trait ascriptions than C trait ascriptions, and (d) positivity-negativity of impressions of fictitious persons was decided mainly by the M content of their behavior, whereas C information served as a weak modifier of impression intensity. The dominance of M traits over C traits was more pronounced for female perceivers than for male perceivers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, N. H. (1968). Likableness ratings of 555 personality trait-words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 272-279.
2.
Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory: Concepts and applications. Chichester, UK. Wiley.
3.
Bargh, J. A. , & Pratto, F. (1986). Individual construct accessibility and perceptual selection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 293-311.
4.
Barkow, L. , Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.). (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual-process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 177-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Brewer, M. B. , & Kramer, R. M. (1985). The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 219-243.
7.
Brycz, H. , & Wojciszke, B. (1992). Personality impressions on ability and morality trait dimensions. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 23, 223-236.
8.
Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.
9.
Cacioppo, J. T. , & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401-423.
10.
Darley, J. M. , & Goethals, G. R.(1980). People's analyses of the causes of ability-linked performances. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 1-37.
11.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role intetpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Fiske, S. T. , & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influence of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1-74.
13.
Haidt, J. , Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 613-628.
14.
Higgins, E. T. , King, G. A., & Mavin, G. H. (1982). Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 35-47.
15.
Hilton, J. L. , & Darley, J. M. (1991). The effects of interaction goals on person perception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 235-267.
16.
Jarvis, W.B.G. , & Petty, R. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 172-194.
17.
Kinder, D. R. , & Sears, D. O. (1985). Public opinion and political action. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 659-741). New York: Random House.
18.
Kubicka-Daab, J. (1989). Positivity and negativity effects in impression formation: Differences in processing information about ability and morality dispositions. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 20, 295-307.
19.
Lewicka, M. (1983). Lista przymiotnikowych okreslen czlowieka [Personality adjective check list]. Przeglad Psychologiczny, 26, 703-713.
20.
Martijn, C. , Spears, R., Van der Pligt, J., & Jakobs, E. (1992). Negativity and positivity effects in person perception and inference: Ability versus morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 453-463.
21.
Martin, I. , & Levey, A. B. (1978). Evaluative conditioning. Advances in Behauzor Research and Therapy, 1, 57-102.
22.
Osgood, C. E. , Suci, G.J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
23.
Ostendorf, F. (1994). Zur Taxonomie Deutscher Dispositions begriffe [Towards a taxonomy of German dispositional terms]. In W. Hager & M. Hasselhorn (Eds.), Handbuch Deutschschprachiger Wortnormen [Handbook of German word norms] (pp. 382-441). Goettingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
24.
Peeters, G. (1983). Relational and informational pattern in social cognition. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Current issues in European social psychology (pp. 201-237). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Peeters, G. (1992). Evaluative meanings of adjectives in vitro and in context: Some theoretical implications and practical consequences of positive negative asymmetry and behavioral-adaptive concepts of evaluation. Psychologia Belgica, 32, 211-231.
26.
Pervin, L. A. (Ed.). (1989). Goal concepts in personality and social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Read, S. J. , Jones, D. K., & Miller, L. C. (1990). Traits as goal-based categories: The importance of goals in the coherence of dispositional categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1048-1061.
28.
Reeder, G. D. (1985). Implicit relations between dispositions and behaviors: Effects on dispositional attribution. In J. H. Harvey & G. Weary (Eds.), Attribution: Basic issues and applications (pp. 87-116). New York: Academic Press.
29.
Rosenberg, S. , & Sedlak, A. (1972). Structural representations of implicit personality theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 235-297.
30.
Shultz, T. R, & Wright, K. (1985). Concepts of negligence and intention in the assignment of moral responsibility. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 17, 97-108.
31.
Shweder, R. A. , Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. (1987). Culture and moral development. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1-83). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
32.
Shweder, R. A. , Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1994). The "Big Three" of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the "Big Three" explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
Skowronski, J.J. , & Carlston, D. E. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5Z689-699.
34.
Skowronski, J. J. , & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142.
35.
Trzebinski, J. (1985). Action-oriented representations of implicit personality theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1266-1278.
36.
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Wojciszke, B. (1994). Multiple meanings of behavior: Construing actions in terms of competence and morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 222-232.
38.
Wojciszke, B. (1997). Parallels between competence-versus morality-related traits and individualistic versus collectivistic values. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 245-256.
39.
Wojciszke, B. , Brycz, H., & Borkenau, P. (1993). Effects of information content and evaluative extremity on positivity and negativity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 327-336.
40.
Wojciszke, B. , Dowhyluk, M., & Jaworski M. (1997). Moral and competence-related traits: How do they differ? Manuscript submitted for publication.
41.
Wojciszke, B. , Pienxkowski, R., Maroszek, A., Brycz, H., & Ratajczak, M. (1993). Lay inferences of personality traits: The role of behavior proto typicality and between-trait differences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 255-272.
