Two studies examined whether some people use more deceptive self-presentation to initiate a dating relationship. Participants reviewed information depicting prospective dates and constructed profiles to be used by the prospects to select a date. In this context, high self-monitoring men and women engaged in more deceptive self-presentation to the person that they desired to date than low self-monitors. Study 2replicated this finding with a variety of personal dimensions and revealed that high self-monitors hold more favorable attitudes toward using deception in dating initiation and admit altering their self-presentation in an attempt to initiate a date. No sex differences in the amount of deceptive self presentation were found. These outcomes suggest that high self-monitors behave in a chameleon-like fashion during dating initiation, strategically and deceptively changing their self-presentation in an attempt to appear more desirable to the person they want to date. Motivations for using deception are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailey, B. L. (1988). From front porch to back seat: Courtship in twentieth century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2.
Baize, H. R, Jr. , & Schroeder, J. E. (1995). Personality and mate selection in personal ads: Evolutionary preferences in a public mate selection process. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 517-536.
3.
Barbee, A. P. (1985). Self-monitoring and the interpretation of moral action. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Georgia.
4.
Beggan, J. K. , & Allison, S. T. (1997). Self-enhancement biases in judgments of own and others' deception. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society of Southeastern Social Psychologists, Norfolk, VA.
5.
Bell, K. L. , & DePaulo, B. M. (1996). liking and lying. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 243-266.
6.
Brandt, D. R. , Miller, G. R., & Hocking, J. E. (1980). Effects of self-monitoring and familiarity on the ability to detect deception. Communication Quarterly, 28, 3-10.
7.
Briggs, S. R. , & Cheek, J. M. (1988). On the nature of self-monitoring: Problems with assessment, problems with validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 663-678.
8.
Briggs, S. R. , Cheek, J. M., & Buss, A. H. (1980). An analysis of the self-monitoring scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 679-686.
9.
Brooks, P. , & Arnold, D. (1989). Reid report examiner's manual (3rd ed.). Chicago: Reid Psychological Systems.
10.
Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616-628.
11.
Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.
12.
Buss, D. M. , & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559-570.
13.
Byrne, D. (1997). An overview (and underview) of research and theory within the attraction paradigm. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 417-431.
14.
Chen, S. , Shechter, D., & Chaiken, S. (1996). Getting at the truth or getting along: Accuracy-versus impression-motivated heuristic and systematic processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 262-275.
15.
Christie, R, & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
16.
Cochran, S. D. , & Mays, V. M. (1990). Sex, lies, and HIV. New England Journal of Medicine, 322, 774-775.
17.
Convey, M. K. , Saladin, S., & Killen, P. J. (1989). Self-monitoring, surveillance, and incentive effects on cheating. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 673-679.
18.
Cunningham, M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 205-217.
19.
Cunningham, M. R, & Barbee, A. P. (1988). On the elements and compounds in personality: A possible reconciliation concerning the Snyder Self-Monitoring Scalk Unpublished manuscript, University of Louisville.
20.
Cunningham, M. R. , Barbee, A. P., Graves, C. R,Lundy, D. E., & Lister, S. C. (1996). Can't buy me love: 7he effects of male wealth and personal qualities on female attraction. Paper presented at the 104th meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.
21.
Cunningham, M. R,Roberts, A. R. , Barbee, A. P., Druen, P. B., & Wu, C. H. (1995). 'Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours:" Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261-279.
22.
DePaulo, B. M. , Epstein, J. A., & Wyer, M. M. (1993). Sex differences in lying: How women and men deal with the dilemma of deceit. In M. Lewis & C. Saarni (Eds.), Lying and deception in everyday life (pp. 126-147). New York: Guilford.
23.
DePaulo, B. M. , & Kashy, D. A. (1998). Everyday lies in close and casual relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 63-79.
24.
DePaulo, B. M. , Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979-995.
25.
deTurck, M. A. , & Miller, G. R.(1990). Training observers to detect deception: Effects of self-monitoring and rehearsal. Human Communication Research, 16, 603-620.
26.
Druen, P. B. , Barbee, A. P., Cunningham, M. R, & Yankeelov, P. A. (1996). Deception, hety, and the illusion of conformity: The dilemma of clashing execution between romantic partners. Manuscript in preparation.
27.
Eagly, A. H. , Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but...: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109-128.
28.
Ekman, P. (1985). Telling lies. New York: Norton.
29.
Elliot, G. C. (1979). Some effects of deception and level of self-monitoring on planning and reacting to a self-presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1282-1292.
30.
Epstein, M. , Ahuvia, A., Burpee, A., & Krieger, R. (1996). Commercial and noncommercial sources for dating introductions on the internet. Paper presented at the 1996 meeting of the International Network on Personal Relationships, Seattle, WA.
31.
Eysenck, H.J. , & Eysenck, S.B.G. (1968). Manual for the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Services.
32.
Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison of five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981-993.
33.
Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125-139.
34.
Folkes, V. S. (1982). Communicating the reasons for social rejection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 235-252.
35.
Ford, C. V. (1996). Lies! lies!! lies!!!: The psychology of deceit. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
36.
Frazier, R. B. , & Fatis, M. (1980). Sex differences in self-monitoring. Psychological Reports, 47, 597-598.
37.
Fried, R, & Major, B. (1980). Self-presentation of sex-role attributes to attractive others. Paper presented at the meeting of Eastern Psychological Association, Hartford, CT.
38.
Furnham, A. (1989). Personality correlates of self-monitoring: The relationship between extraversion, neuroticism, type A behaviour and Snyder's self-monitoring construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 35-42.
39.
Geizer, R. S. , Rarick, D. L., & Soldow, G. F. (1977). Deception and judgment of accuracy: A study in person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 446-449.
40.
Glick, P. (1985). Orientations toward relationships: Choosing a situation in which to begin a relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 544-562.
41.
Glick, P. , DeMorest, J. A., & Hotze, C. A. (1988). Self-monitoring and beliefs about partner compatibility in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 485-494.
42.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
43.
Gonzalez, M. H. , & Meyers, S. (1993). 'Your mother would like me": Self-presentation in the personal ads of heterosexual and homosexual men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 131-142.
44.
Goodwin, R. (1990). Sex differences among partner preferences: Are the sexes really very similar?Sex Roles, 23, 501-513.
45.
Hendrick, C. , & Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 50, 392-402.
46.
John, O. P. , Cheek, J. M., & Klohnen, E. C. (1996). On the nature of self-monitoring: Construct explication with Q-sort ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 763-776.
47.
Jones, M. (1993). Influence of self-monitoring on dating motivations. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 197-206.
48.
Kashy, D. A. , & DePaulo, B. M. (1996). Who lies?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1037-1051.
49.
Kraus, M. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58-75.
50.
Leary, M. R. (1995). Se&4presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behaviorDubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
51.
Lindskold, S. , & Walters, P. S. (1983). Categories for acceptability of lies. Journal of Social Psychology, 120, 129-136.
52.
Lippa, R. (1976). Expressive control and the leakage of dispositional introversion-extraversion during role-played teaching. Journal of Personality, 44, 541-559.
53.
Metts, S. , & Hippensteele, S. (1988). Characteristics of deception in close relationships. In D. O'Hair & B. R. Patterson (Eds.), Advances in interpersonal communication research. Las Cruces, NM: Communication Resources Center.
54.
Millar, K. U. , & Tesser, A. (1987). Deceptive behavior in social relationships: A consequence of violated expectations. Journal of Psychology, 122, 263-273.
55.
Miller, G. K,deTurck, M. A. , & Kalbfleisch, P.J. (1983). Self-monitoring, rehearsal, and deceptive communication. Human Communication Research, 10, 97-117.
56.
Miller, G. R. , Mongeau, P. A., & Sleight, C. (1986). Fudging with friends and lying to lovers: Deceptive communication in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 495-512.
57.
Mongeau, P. A. , Hale, J. L., Johnson, K. L., & Hillis, J. D. (1993). Who's wooing whom? An investigation of female initiated dating. In P. J. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Interpersonal communication: Evolving interpersonal relationships (pp. 51-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58.
Paulhus, D. L. , & Reid, D. B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in social desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 301-317.
59.
Riggio, R. E. , Tucker, J., & Throckmorton, B. (1987). Social skills and deception ability. Personality and Social Psychology Buletin, 13, 568-577.
60.
Rosenthal, R. , & DePaulo, B. M. (1979). Sex differences in accommodatingness in nonverbal communication. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.), Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn, & Hain.
61.
Rowatt, W. C. (1997). Managing the impression of significant others: Other monitoring scale development and validation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Louisville.
62.
Rowatt, W. C. , Cunningham, M. K,Druen, P. B., Lawrence, T.J., Lundy, D. E., Pospisil, J. A., & Miles, S. (1996). Lying to potential dates and potential employers: The social uses of deception. Paper presented at the 1996 meeting of the International Network on Personal Relationships, Seattle, WA.
63.
Saarni, C. , & Lewis, M. (1993). Deceit and illusion in human affairs. In M. Lewis & C. Saarni (Eds.), Lying and deception in everyday life (pp. 1-29). New York: Guilford.
64.
Schlenker, B. R. , & Weigold, M. F. (1992). Interpersonal processes involving impression regulation and management. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 133-168.
65.
Schmitt, D. P. , & Buss, D. M. (1996). Strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation: Sex and context effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1185-1204.
66.
Seto, M. C. , Khattar, N. A., Lalumiere, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1997). Deception and sexual strategy in psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 2Z301-307.
67.
Shaffer, D. R. , & Bazzini, D. G. (1997). What do you look for in a prospective date?: Reexamining the preferences of men and women who differ in self-monitoring propensities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 605-616.
68.
Shusterman, G. , & Saxe, L. (1990). Deception in romantic relationships. Unpublished manuscript, Brandeis University.
69.
Siegman, A. W. , & Reynolds, M. A. (1983). Self-monitoring and speech in feigned and unfeigned lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1325-1333.
70.
Simpson, J. A. , & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870-883.
71.
Simpson, J. A. , Gangestad, S. W., & Biek, M. (1993). Personality and nonverbal social behavior: An ethological perspective of relationship initiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 434-461.
72.
Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
73.
Snyder, M. (1979). Self-monitoring processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 85-128). New York: Academic Press.
74.
Snyder, M. (1987). Public appearances/private realities: The psychology of sef-monitoring. New York: Freeman.
75.
Snyder, M. , Berscheid, E., & Glick, P. (1985). Focusing on the exterior and the interior: Two investigations of the initiation of personal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1427-1439.
76.
Snyder, M. , & Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of the self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 125-139.
77.
Snyder, M. , & Simpson, J. A. (1984). Self-monitoring and dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1281-1291.
78.
Snyder, M. , & Simpson, J. A. (1987). Orientations toward romantic relationships. In D. Perlman & S. Duck (Eds.), Intimate relationships: Development, dynamics, and deterioration (pp. 45-62). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
79.
Spence, J. T. , & Helmreich, R. T. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
80.
Sprecher, S. , Sullivan, Q., & Hatfield, E. (1994). Mate selection preferences: Gender differences examined in a national sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1074-1080.
81.
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
82.
Thiessen, D. , Young, R. K., & Burroughs, R. (1993). Lonely hearts advertisements reflect sexually dimorphic mating strategies. Ethology &Sociobiology, 14, 209-229.
83.
Tooke, W. , & Camire, L. (1991). Patterns of deception in intersexual and intrasexual mating strategies. Ethology & Sociobiology, 12, 345-364.
84.
Travis, C. B. , & Yeager, C. P. (1991). Sexual selection, parental investment, and sexism. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 117-129.
85.
Trivers, R. (1985). Social evolution. Menlo Park, CA. Benjamin-Cummings.
86.
von Bayer, C. L. , Sherk, D. L., & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Impression management in thejob interview: When the female applicant meets the (chauvinist) interviewer. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 45-51.
87.
Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary. (1986). Springfield, MA: Merriam Webster.
88.
Woll, S. B. , & Young, P. (1989). Looking for Mr. or Mrs. Right: Self-presentation in video dating. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 483-488.
89.
Zanna, M. P. , & Pack, S. J. (1975). On the self-fulfilling nature of apparent sex differences in behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 583-591.
