This study examined the effects of political identity and the changing intergroup context on communication perceptions during an election campaign. Perceptions of media bias and of campaign impact on self and others were assessed before and after the election. The responses of politically aligned voters reflected their membership in a dominant or subordinate group preelection and in a losing or winning group postelection. Dominant group members were initially less biased in their views of the campaign and its impact but sought to blame their party's loss on media bias and on the gullibility of political out-group members and voters in general. Subordinate group members initially showed strong in-group-serving biases but were less critical of the media and the electorate after their party had won. Results highlight the dynamic, intergroup nature of media perceptions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
2.
Brewer, M. B. (1993). Social identity, distinctiveness, and in-group homogeneity. Social Cognition, 11, 150-164.
3.
Brown, R. (1978). Divided we fall: An analysis of relations between sections of a factory workforce. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 395-429). London: Academic Press.
4.
Brown, R. , Condor, S., Mathews, A., Wade, G., & Williams, J. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273-286.
5.
Budesheim, T. L. , Houston, D. A., & DePaola, S. J. (1996). Persuasiveness of in-group and out-group political messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 523-534.
6.
Butler, D. (1996, February 22). What difference does it make who wins? The Australian, p. 11.
7.
Codol, J.-P. (1984). Social differentiation and non-differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension (pp. 314-337). Cambridge, UKCambridge University Press.
8.
Cohen, J. , & Davis, R. G. (1991). Third-person effects and the differential impact in negative political advertising. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 680-688.
9.
Cohen, J. , Mutz, D., Price, V., & Gunther, A. (1988). Perceived impact of defamation: An experiment on third-person effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 161-173.
10.
Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1-15.
11.
Duck, J. M. , Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (1995). Me, us and them: Political identification and the third-person effect in the 1993 Australian federal election. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 195-215.
12.
Duck, J. M. , Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (1997). Perceived self-other differences in persuasibility: The effects of interpersonal and group-based similarity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 842-862.
13.
Duck, J. M. , & Mullin, B.-A. (1995). The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third-person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 77-93.
14.
Duck, J. M. , Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1995). The perceived influence of AIDS advertising: Third-person effects in the context of positive media content. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 305-325.
15.
Eagly, A. H. , & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
16.
Ellemers, N. , Doojse, B. J., van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1992). Status protection in high status minority groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 123-140.
17.
Ellemers, N. , van Knippenberg, A., de Vries, N., & Wilke, H. (1988). Social identification and permeability of group boundaries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 497-513.
18.
Ellemers, N. , van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233-246.
19.
Ellemers, N. , Wilke, H., & van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766-778.
20.
Garramone, G. M. (1984). Voter responses to negative political ads. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 250-259.
21.
Gibbon, P. , & Durkin, K. (1995). The third-person effect: Social distance and perceived media bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 597-602.
22.
Giles, H. , & Johnson, P. (1987). Ethnolinguistic identity theory: Asocial psychological approach to language maintenance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 68, 256-269.
23.
Giner-Sorolla, R. , & Chaiken, S. (1994). The causes of hostile media judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 165-180.
24.
Gunther, A. (1991). What we think others think: Cause and consequence in the third-person effect. Communication Research, 18, 355-372.
25.
Gunther, A. , & Mundy, P. (1993). Biased optimism and the third-person effect. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 58-67.
26.
Gunther, A. , & Thorson, E. (1992). Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public service announcements: Third-person effects in new domains. Communication Research, 19, 574-596.
27.
Haunschild, P. R. , Moreland, R. L., & Murrell, A. J. (1994). Sources of resistance to mergers between groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1150-1178.
28.
Hogg, M. A. , & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London and New York: Routledge.
29.
Hogg, M. A. , & Hains, S. C. (1996). Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 295-309.
30.
Howard's 100 days of power . (1996, June 8-9). The Weekend Australian, p. 18.
31.
Kingdon, J. W. (1967). Politicians' beliefs about voters. American Political Science Review, 61, 137-145.
32.
Lalonde, R. N. (1992). The dynamics of group differentiation in the face of defeat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 336-342.
33.
Lalonde, R. , Moghaddam, F. M., & Taylor, B. M. (1987). The process of group differentiation in a dynamic intergroup setting. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 273-287.
34.
Lemaine, G. (1974). Social differentiation and social originality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 17-52.
35.
Leyens, J.-P. , & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1992). The ingroup over exclusion effect: Impact of valence and confirmation on stereotypical information search. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 549-570.
36.
Lord, C. G. , Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
37.
Mackie, D. M. , Gastardo-Conaco, M. C., & Skelly, J. J. (1992). Knowledge of the advocated position and the processing of in-group and out-group persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 145-151.
38.
Mackie, D. M. , Worth, L. T., & Asuncion, A. G. (1990). Processing of persuasive in-group messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 812-822.
39.
Maslach, C. (1974). Social and personal bases of individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 411-425.
40.
Miller, G. W. (1987). Persuasion. In C. R. Berger & S. H. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 446-483). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
Oaker, G. , & Brown, R. (1986). Intergroup relations in a hospital setting: A further test of social identity theory. Human Relations, 39, 767-778.
42.
Perloff, R. (1989). Ego-involvement and the third-person effect of televised news coverage. Communication Research, 16, 236-262.
43.
Perloff, R. (1993). Third-person effect research 1983-1992: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 167-184.
44.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461-476.
45.
Price, V. (1989). Social identification and public opinion: Effects of communicating group conflict. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 197-224.
46.
Ross, L. D. , Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The false consensus phenomenon: An attributional bias in self-perception and social perception processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
47.
Ross, M. , & Fletcher, G. J. O. (1985). Attribution and social perception. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 73-122). New York: Random House.
48.
Rucinski, D. , & Salmon, C. T. (1990). The "other" as the vulnerable voter: A study of the third-person effect in the 1988 U.S. presidential campaign. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2, 345-368.
49.
Sachdev, I. , & Bourhis, R. (1993). Ethnolinguistic vitality. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 33-51). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
50.
Sherif, M. , & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
51.
Simon, B. (1993). On the asymmetry in the cognitive construal of ingroup and outgroup: A model of egocentric categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 131-147.
52.
Skevington, S. M. (1981). Intergroup relations and nursing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 43-59.
53.
Smith, R. (1986). Television addiction. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 109-128). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
Snyder, C. R. , & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. New York: Plenum.
55.
Steketee, M. (1996, March 4). Howard's way forward. The Australian, p. 17.
56.
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13, 65-93.
57.
Tajfel, H. (1975). The exit of social mobility and the voice of social change. Social Science Information, 14, 101-118.
58.
Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
59.
Taylor, D. M. , & Jaggi, V. (1974). Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in a S. Indian context. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 162-171.
60.
Taylor, L. (1996, February 29). Optimistic Keating dismisses private party polling. The Australian, p. 7.
61.
Terry, D. J. , Callan, V. J., & Satori, G. (1996). Employee adjustment to organizational mergers: Stress, coping and intergroup differences. Stress Medicine, 12, 105-122.
62.
Tingle, L. (1996, March 2-3). Coalition a "fraudulent" regime, says defiant PM. The Weekend Australian, p. 9.
63.
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, UKCambridge University Press.
64.
Turner, J. C. , & Brown, R. (1978). Social status, cognitive alternatives and intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 201-226). London: Academic Press.
65.
Vallone, R. , Ross, L., & Lepper, M. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacreJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577-585.
66.
van Knippenberg, A. , & Ellemers, N. (1993). Strategies in intergroup relations. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 17-32). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
67.
Vaughan, G. M. (1978). Social change and intergroup preferences in New Zealand. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 297-314.
68.
Wright, S. , Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.
69.
Zanna, M. P. , Klosson, E. C., & Darley, J. M. (1976). How television news viewers deal with facts that contradict their beliefs: A consistency and attribution analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6, 169-176.
70.
Ziller, R. C. (1964). Individuation and socialization. Human Relations, 17, 341-360.
