Psychological Attachment to the Group: Cross-Cultural Differences in Organizational Identification and Subjective Norms as Predictors of Workers' Turnover Intentions
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 1998
Psychological Attachment to the Group: Cross-Cultural Differences in Organizational Identification and Subjective Norms as Predictors of Workers' Turnover Intentions
Two studies used the theory of reasoned action, social identity theory, and Ash forth and Mael's work on organizational identification to predict turnover intentions in Japanese and British commercial and academic organizations. In both studies and in both countries, the authors expected and found that identification with the organization substantially and significantly predicted turnover intentions. Attitudes predicted intentions only in Study 2, and subjective norms significantly predicted intentions across both studies. The authors hypothesized that subjective norms would be a significantly stronger predictor of turnover intentions in a collectivist setting. This prediction was supported. Although social identity is strongly associated with turnover intentions across both cultures, the subjective normative aspects of group membership are significantly more strongly associated in the Japanese organizations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrams, D. (1985). Focus of attention in the minimal group paradigm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 65-74.
2.
Abrams, D. (1990). National health authority report. Canterbury, UK: University of Kent.
3.
Abrams, D. (1992). Processes of social identification. In G. M. Breakwell (Ed.). Social psychology of identity and the self-concept (pp. 57-100). San Diego: Academic Press.
4.
Abrams, D. (1994). Social self-regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 273-283.
5.
Abrams, D. , & Emler, N. P. (1992). Self-denial as a paradox of political and regional identity: Findings from a study of 16-and 18-year olds. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 279-295.
6.
Abrams, D. , Hinkle, S., & Tomlins, M. (1997, July). Social identity in transition: Implications for commitment to HongKong. Paper presented at the International Conference on the Transition to Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.
7.
Abrams, D. , & Hogg, M. A. (Eds). (1990). Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
8.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
9.
Ajzen, I. , & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
Alutto,J. A. , Hrebiniak, L. G., & Alonso, R. C. (1973). On operationalizing the concept of commitment. Social Forces, 51, 448-454.
11.
Ashforth, B. E. , & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
12.
Becker, T. E. , Randall, D. M., & Riegel, C. D. (1995). The multidimensional view of commitment and the theory of reasoned action: A comparative evaluation. Journal of Management, 21, 617-638.
13.
Ben-Bakr, K. A. , Al-Shammari, I. S., Jefri, O. A., & Prasad, J. N. (1994). Organizational commitment, satisfaction, and turnover in Saudi organizations: A predictive study. Journal of Socio Economics, 23(4), 449-456.
14.
Besser, T. L. (1993). The commitment of Japanese workers and U.S. workers: A reassessment of the literature. American Sociological Review, 58, 873-881.
15.
Brown, R. J. (1978). Divided we fall: An analysis of relations between sections of a factory workforce. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 395-430). London: Academic Press.
16.
Brown, R.J. , Condor, S., Wade, G., Mathews, A., & Williams, J. A. (1979). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273-286.
17.
Cole, R. E. (1979). Work, mobility and participation: A comparative study of American and Japanese industry. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
18.
Cole, R. E. , Kalleberg, A. L., & Lincoln, J. R. (1993). Assessing commitment in the United States and Japan: A comment on Besser. American Sociological Review, 59, 882-885.
19.
Cousin, S. D. (1989). Culture and self-perception in Japan and in the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 124-131.
20.
Dutton,J. E. , Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263.
21.
Farh,J-L. , Dobbins, G. H., & Cheng, B:S. (1991). Cultural relativity in action: A comparison of self-ratings made by Chinese and U.S. workers. Personnel Psychology, 44, 129-147.
22.
Fishbein, M. , & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
23.
Fishbein, M. , & Stasson, M. (1990). The role of desires, self-predictions, and perceived control in the prediction of training session attendance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 173-198.
24.
Hinkle, S. , & Brown, R.J. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48-70). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
25.
Hinkle, S. , Fox-Cardamone, L., Haseleu,J. A., Brown, R., & Irwin, L. M. (1996). Grassroots political action as an intergroup phenomenon. Journal of Social Issues, 52, 39-52.
26.
Hinkle, S. , Taylor, L. A., Fox-Cardamone, D. L., & Crook, K. F. (1989). Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation: A multi-component approach. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 305-317.
27.
Hinz, V. B. , & Nelson, L. C. (1990). Testing models of turnover intentions with university faculty. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 68-84.
28.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29.
Hom, P. W. , Katerberg, R., & Hullin, C. L. (1979). Comparative examination of three approaches to the prediction of turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 280-290.
30.
Howell, D. C. (1997). Statistical methods for psychology (2nd ed.). Boston: Duxbury.
31.
Hrebiniak, L. G. , & Alutto, J. A. (1972). Personal and role-related factors in the development of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 555-573.
32.
Keizai Koho Center . (1987). Japan 1987: An international comparison. Tokyo: Japan Institute for Social and Economic Affairs.
33.
Koch, J. T. , & Steers, R. M. (1978). Job attachment, satisfaction, and turnover among public sector employees. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 12, 119-128.
34.
Lane, I. M. , Mathews, R. C., & Presholdt, P. H. (1988). Determinants of nurses' intentions to leave their profession. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9, 367-372.
35.
Lebra, T. S. (1976). Japanese patterns of behavior. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
36.
Lincoln, J. R. , & Kalleberg, A. L. (1985). Work organization and workforce commitment: A study of plants and employees in the U.S. and Japan. American Sociological Review, 50, 738-760.
37.
Lincoln,J. R. , & Kalleberg, A. L. (1990). Culture, control, and commitment: A study of work organization and work attitudes in the United States and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Loscocco, K. A. , & Kalleberg, A. L. (1988). Age and the meaning of work in the United States and Japan. Social Forces, 67, 337-356.
39.
Mael, F. A. (1991). A conceptual rationale for the domain and attributes of biodata items. Personnel Psychology, 44, 763-792.
40.
Mael, F. A. , & Ashforth, B. E. (1995). Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification and turnover among newcomers. Personnel Psychology, 48, 307-333.
41.
Mael, F. A. , & Tetrick, L. E. (1992). Identifying organizational identification. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 813-824.
42.
Markus, H. R. , & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
43.
Markus, H. R. , & Kitayama; S. (1994). A collective fear of the collective: Implications for selves and theories of selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 568-579.
44.
Mathieu,J. E. , & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.
45.
Meyer, J. P. , & Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the "side-bet theory" of organizational commitment Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 372-378.
46.
Mobley, W. H. , Griffeth, R. W., Hand, H. H., & Meglino, B. M. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 493-522.
47.
Near,J. P. (1989). Organizational commitment among Japanese and U.S. workers. Organizational studies, 10(3), 281-300.
48.
Porter, L. W. , Crampon, W. F., & Smith, F. J. (1976). Organizational commitment and managerial turnover: A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15, 87-98.
49.
Porter, L. W. , Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603-609.
50.
Presholdt, P. H. , Lane, I. M., & Mathews, R. C. (1987). Nurse turnover as reasoned action: Development of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 221-227.
51.
Reichers, A. E. (1985). A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 465-476.
52.
Sengoku, T. (1985). Willing workers: The work ethics in Japan, England, and the United States. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
53.
Shook, R. L. (1988). Honda: An American success story. New York: Prentice Hall.
54.
Steel, R. P. , & Ovalle, N. K. (1984). A review and meta-analysis of research on the relationship between behavioral intentions and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 673-686.
55.
Tabachnick, B. G. , & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
56.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61-76). London: Academic Press.
57.
Tajfel, H. , & Turner,J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
58.
Takezawa, S. , & Whitehill, A. M. (1981). Work ways: Japan and America. Tokyo: Japan Institute of Labor.
59.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: West view.
60.
Triandis, H. C. , Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-in group relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323-338.
61.
Turner, J. C. , Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
62.
White, M. M. , Parks, J. D., Gallagher, D. G., Tetrault, L. A., & Wakabayashi, M. (1995). Validity evidence for the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire in the Japanese corporate culture. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(2), 278-290.
63.
Y,J. , & Murphy, K. R. (1993). Modesty bias in self-ratings of performance: A test of the cultural relativity hypothesis. Personnel Psychology, 46, 257-363.
