The correspondence bias involves attributing an actor's behavior to his or her disposition, even when the actor's behavior was constrained. The bias occurs in part because perceivers believe that an actor behaves in ways that reflect both the constraint and the actor's true traits or attitudes, which "leak "from the constrained behavior Students in three studies demonstrated significant leakage beliefs in their expectations for constrained essay writers' true traits and attitudes. The greater an individual's leakage beliefs (in Study 3), the greater that individual's correspondence bias. The results support previous conceptual analyses of the correspondence bias and emphasize the importance of individual differences to understanding the phenomenon.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bond, C. F., Jr. , Kahler, K. N., & Paolicelli, L. M. (1985). The miscommunication of deception: An adaptive perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 331-345.
2.
Bond, C. F., Jr. , Omar, A., Pitre, U., Lashley, B. R., Skaggs, L. M., & Kirk, C. T. (1992). Fishy-looking liars: Deception judgment from expectancy violation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 969-977.
3.
Bond, C. F., Jr. , & Robinson, M. (1988). The evolution of deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12295-307.
4.
Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. Srull & R. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Cacioppo, J. T. , & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42116-131.
6.
D'Agostino, P. R. , & Fincher-Kiefer, R. (1992). Need for cognition and correspondence bias. Social Cognition, 10, 151-163.
7.
DePaulo, B. M. (1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 203-243.
8.
DePaulo, B. M. , Stone, J. I., & Lassiter, G. D. (1985). Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B. R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self and social life (pp. 323-370). New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Ekman, P. (1985). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. New York: Norton.
10.
Fein, S. (1996). Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1164-1184.
11.
Fein, S. , Hilton, J. L., & Miller, D. T. (1990). Suspicion of ulterior motivation and the correspondence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 753-764.
12.
Fiske, S. T. , & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression-formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic Press.
13.
Fletcher, G. J. O. , Danilovics, P., Fernandez, G., Peterson, D., & Reeder, G. D. (1986). Attributional complexity: An individual differences measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 875-884.
14.
Fletcher, G. J. O. , Reeder, G. D., & Bull, V. (1990). Bias and accuracy in attitude attribution: The role of attributional complexity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 275-288.
15.
Funder, D. C. (1991). Global traits: A neo-Allportian approach to personality. Psychological Science2, 31-39.
16.
Gilbert, D. T. (1989). Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 189-211). New York, NY: Guilford.
17.
Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107-119.
18.
Gilbert, D. T. , & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38.
19.
Hilton, J. L. , Fein, S., & Miller, D. T. (1993). Suspicion and dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 501-512.
20.
Jones, E. E. (1979). The rocky road from acts to dispositions. American Psychologist, 34, 107-117.
21.
Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: W. H. Freeman.
22.
Jones, E. E. , & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1-24.
23.
Jones, E. E. , & McGillis, D. (1976). Correspondent inferences and the attribution cube: A comparative reappraisal. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 389-420). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Jones, E. E. , Worchel, S., Goethals, G. R., & Grumet, J. (1971). Prior expectancy and behavioral extremity as determinants of attitude attribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 59-80.
25.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). A motivated gatekeeper of our minds: Need for closure effects on social cognition and interaction. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context (Vol. 3, pp. 465-496). New York: Guilford.
26.
Manstead, A. S. R. , Wagner, H. L., & MacDonald, C. J. (1986). Deceptive and nondeceptive communications: Sending experience, modality, and individual abilities. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 10, 147-167.
27.
Marks, G. , & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 72-90.
28.
Miller, A. G. , Ashton, W., & Mishal, M. (1990). Beliefs concerning the features of constrained behavior: A basis for the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 635-650.
29.
Miller, A. G. , Jones, E. E., & Hinkle, S. (1981). A robust attribution error in the personality domain. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 587-600.
30.
Miller, A. G. , & Rorer, L. (1982). Toward an understanding of the fundamental attribution error: Essay diagnosticity in the attitude attribution paradigm. Journal of Research in Personality, 16, 41-59.
31.
Reeder, G. D. (1993). Trait-behavior relations and dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 586-593.
32.
Reeder, G. D. , Fletcher, G. J. O., & Furman, K. (1989). The role of observers' expectations in attitude attribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 168-188.
33.
Reeder, G. D. , Pryor, J. B., & Wojciszke, B. (1992). Trait-behavior relations in social information processing. In G. R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction, and social cognition (pp. 37-57). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
Roney, C. J. R. , & Sorrentino, R. M. (1995). Reducing self-discrepancies or maintaining self congruence? Uncertainty orientation, self-regulation, and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 485-497.
35.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 174-221). New York: Academic Press.
36.
Ross, L. , Amabile, T. M., & Steinmetz, J. L. (1977). Social roles, social control, and biases in social perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 485-494.
37.
Ross, L. , Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The "false -onsensus effect": An egocentric bias in social perception and the attribution process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13279-301.
38.
Ross, L. , & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
39.
Swann, W. B., Jr. (1984). The quest for accuracy in person perception: A matter of pragmatics. Psychological Review, 91, 457-472.
40.
Toris, C. , & DePaulo, B. M. (1984). Effects of actual deception and suspiciousness of deception on interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4 7, 1063-1073.
41.
Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93, 239-257.
42.
Wilson, T. D. , & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 117-142.
43.
Zuckerman, M. , DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1-59). New York: Academic Press.
