In four studies, effects of self-perceived or public-perceived threats to group status or group distinctiveness on self-stereotyping (defined as similarity to prototypical in-group members) were investigated for people with high or low in-group identification. The main prediction was that high and low identifiers will respond differentially when their group's status or distinctiveness is threatened such that self-stereotyping is reduced for low identifiers but enhanced for high identifiers. Although the four studies investigated different comparison groups and different kinds of group threat, the results of all studies provided support for the prediction, and this was confirmed by a meta-analysis. This supports the authors' argument that the initial level of group identification determines whether group members are likely to set themselves apart from the rest of their group or to show group solidarity when their identity as group members is threatened.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Branscombe, N. R. , & Wann, D. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641-658.
2.
Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
3.
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
4.
Brown, R. J. (1984). The effects of intergroup similarity and cooperative vs. competitive orientation on intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 21-33.
5.
Brown, R. J. , & Abrams, D. (1986). The effects of intergroup similarity and goal interdependence on intergroup attitudes and task performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2278-92.
6.
Brown, R. J. , & Wade, G. (1987). Superordinate goals and intergroup behaviour: The effect of role ambiguity and status on intergroup attitudes and task performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 131-142.
7.
Cialdini, R. B. , Borden, R. J., Thorne, R. J., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366-375.
8.
Diehl, M. (1990). The minimal group paradigm: Theoretical explanations and empirical findings. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 263-292.
9.
Dion, K. L. (1975). Women's reactions to discrimination from members of the same or opposite sex. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 294-306.
10.
Dion, K. L. , & Earn, B. M. (1975). The phenomenology of being a target of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32944-950.
11.
Doosje, B. , Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436.
12.
Doosje, B. , Spears, R., & Koomen, W. (1995). When bad isn't all bad: The strategic use of sample information in generalization and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 642-655.
13.
Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27-57.
14.
Ellemers, N. , & Van Knippenberg, A. (1997). The social context of stereotypes. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group lifeOxford, UKBasil Blackwell.
15.
Ellemers, N. , Van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233-246.
16.
Ellemers, N. , Wilke, H., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective identity enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766-778.
17.
Grant, P. (1993). Ethnocentrism in response to a threat to social identity. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 8, 143-154.
18.
Haslam, S. A. , Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., & Hayes, B. K. (1992). Context dependent variation in social stereotyping 1: The effects of intergroup relations as mediated by social change and frame of reference. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 3-20.
19.
Hewstone, M. R. C. , & Brown, R. J. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the contact hypothesis. In M. R. C. Hewstone & R. J. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1-44). Oxford, UKBlackwell.
20.
Hinkle, S. , & Brown, R. J. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp.48-70). New York: Harvester Wheat sheaf.
21.
James, K. , & Cropanzano, R. (1994). Dispositional group loyalty and individual action for the benefit of an ingroup: Experimental and correlational evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 179-205.
22.
Jetten, J. , Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1996). Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1222-1233.
23.
Kelly, C. (1988). Intergroup differentiation in a political context. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 319-332.
24.
Kelly, C. (1989). Political identity and perceived intragroup homogeneity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 239-250.
25.
Kelly, C. (1990). Social identity and intergroup perceptions in minority-majority contexts. Human Relations, 43, 583-599.
26.
Messick, D. M. , & Mackie, D. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45-81.
27.
Mlicki, P. P. , & Ellemers, N. (1996). Being different or being better? National stereotypes and identifications of Polish and Dutch students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 97-114.
28.
Mullen, B. , Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
29.
Mummendey, A. , & Schreiber, H. J. (1984). Different just means better: Some obvious and some hidden pathways to ingroup favouritism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 363-368.
30.
Oaker, G. , & Brown, R. J. (1986). Intergroup relations in a hospital setting: A further test of social identity theory. Human Relations, 39, 767-778.
31.
Oakes, P. J. , Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford, UK, and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
32.
Park, B. , Judd, C. M., & Ryan, C. S. (1991). Social categorization and the representation of variability information. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 2, -pp. 211-245). Chichester, UKWiley.
33.
Rabbie, J. M. , & Horwitz, M. (1988). Categories versus groups as explanatory concepts in intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 117-123.
34.
Rabbie, J. M. , Schot, J. C., & Visser, L. (1989). Social identity theory: A conceptual and empirical critique from the perspective of a behavioural interaction model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 171-202.
35.
Roccas, S. , & Schwartz, S. H. (1993). Effects of intergroup similarity on intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 581-595.
36.
Simon, B. , & Hamilton, D. L. (1994). Self-stereotyping and social context: The effects of relative in-group size and in-group status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 699-711.
37.
Simon, B. , & Pettigrew, T. F. (1990). Social identity and perceived group homogeneity: Evidence for the ingroup homogeneity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 269-286.
38.
Snyder, C. R. , & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. New York: Plenum.
39.
Spears, R. (1995). Isolating the collective self. In A. Oosterwegel & R. Wicklund (Eds.), The self in European and North American culture: Development and processes (Nato ASI series, Vol. 84, pp. 309-322). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
40.
Spears, R. , & Manstead, A. S. R. (1989). The social context of stereotyping and differentiation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 101-121.
41.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
42.
Tajfel, H. (1984). Intergroup relations, social myths and social justice in social psychology. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (pp. 695-715). Cambridge, U& Cambridge University Press.
43.
Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intrgroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
44.
Turner, J. C. (1978). Social comparison, similarity and ingroup favouritism. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intrgroup relationsLondon: Academic Press.
45.
Turner, J. C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
46.
Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
47.
Turner, J. C. , Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UKBasil Blackwell.
48.
Turner, J. C. , Hogg, M. A., Turner, P. J., & Smith, P. M. (1984). Failure and defeat as determinants of group cohesiveness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 97-111.
49.
Van Knippenberg, A. (1984). Intergroup differences in group perceptions. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimensions: European developments in social psychology (pp. 560-578). Cambridge, UKCambridge University Press.
50.
Wann, D. L. , & Branscombe, N. R. (1990). Die-hard and fair-weather fans: Effects of identification on BIRGing and CORFing tendencies. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 14, 103-117.
51.
Wetherell, M. S. (1982). Cross-cultural studies of minimal groups: Implications for the social identity theory of intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 207-240). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Worchel, S. , Coutant-Sassic, D., & Grossman, M. (1992). A developmental approach to group dynamics: A model and illustrative research. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 181-202). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
