The effects of a lucky event and irrational beliefs about luck were examined. In two experiments, some subjects experienced a lucky event, whereas others did not. All subjects then completed an unrelated decision task rated their confidence, and placed a bet. The effects of a lucky experience depended substantially on individual beliefs concerning the causal properties of luck. After the lucky event, those who believed in luck (i.e., thought of luck as a stable, personal attribute) were more confident and bet more, whereas those who did not believe in luck (i.e., thought luck was random) were less confident and bet less. A third experiment identified analogous effects using multiple-choice test questions that included a monetary penalty for errors. Increased expectations following initial luck were interpreted in terms of a lucky streak effect, whereas the paradoxical decrease in expectancy was viewed as an instance of the gamblers' fallacy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, C. A. (1983). The causal structure of situations: The generation of plausible causal attributions as a function of type of event situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 185-203.
2.
Bouts, P. , & Van Avermaet, E. (1992). Drawing familiar or unfamiliar cards: Stimulus familiarity, chance orientation, and the illusion of control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 331-335.
3.
Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 56-71.
4.
Brown, J. (1984). Effects of induced mood on causal attributions for success and failure. Motivation and Emotion, 8, 343-353.
5.
Burger, J. M. (1986). Desire for control and the illusion of control: The effects of familiarity and sequence outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 66-76.
6.
Darke, P. R. (1993). The effect of a lucky event and belief in luck on confidence and risk-taking. Dissertation Abstracts International 55(03), 1222B. (University Microfilms No. AAC-NN86228)
7.
Darke, P. R. , & Chaiken, S. (1997). [Mood effects on risk-taking]. Unpublished raw data.
8.
Darke, P. R. , & Freedman, J. L. (1997). The belief in good luck scale. Manuscript submitted for publication.
9.
Dunn, D. S. , & Wilson, T. D. (1990). When the stakes are high: A limit to the illusion of control effect. Social Cognition, 8, 305-323.
10.
Gilovich, T. , & Douglas, C. (1986). Biased evaluations of randomly determined gambling outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 228-241.
11.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In E. Higgins & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 53-92). New York: Guilford.
12.
Gollwitzer, P. M. , & Kinney, R. F. (1989). Effects of deliberative and implemental mind-sets on illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 531-542.
13.
Henslin, J. M. (1967). Craps and magic. American journal of Sociology, 73, 316-330.
14.
Isen, A. M. , & Geva, N. (1987). The influence of positive affect on acceptable level of risk: The person with a large canoe has a large worry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 145-154.
15.
Johnson, E. J. , & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 20-31.
16.
Jordan goes back to No. 23 . (1995, May 11). USA Today, p. 8C.
17.
Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311-328.
18.
McMahan, I. D. (1973). Relationships between causal attributions and expectancy of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 108-114.
19.
Phares, E. J. (1957). Expectancy changes in skill and chance situations. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54, 339-342.
20.
Rosenthal, R. , & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused compari-sons in the analysis of variance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Rotter, J. B. (1955). The role of the psychological situation in deter-mining the direction of human behavior. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 3, pp. 245-269). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
22.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (Whole No. 609).
23.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
24.
Strickland, L. H. , Lewicki, R. J., & Katz, A. M. (1966). Temporal orientation and perceived control as determinants of risk-taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2143-151.
25.
Taylor, S. E. , & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1995). Effects of mindset on positive illusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 213-226.
26.
Wagenaar, W. A. (1988). Paradoxes of gambling behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
28.
Weiner, B. , Frieze, I., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S., & Rosenbaum, R. M. (1972). Perceiving the causes of success and failure. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 95-120). New York: General Learning.
29.
Wright, J. , & Mischel, W. (1982). Influence of affect on cognitive social learning person variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 901-914.
30.
Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited or the motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality, 47, 245-287.
