The terms love and in love are often used in common discourse. A social categorical approach, whereby the actual members of an individual's social categories are examined, was used to investigate the differential meaning of these terms. It was hypothesized that (a) the membership of the love category would be larger than that of the in love category; (b) the membership of the in love category would be encapsulated within the love category membership, indicating that love is the higher order generic term; (c) that the membership of the in love category, but not the love category, would be encapsulated within a sexual attraction/desire category membership; (d) although these effects would be observed for both men and women, certain gender differences would be observed. All hypotheses were confirmed. The implications of these findings for a taxonomy of love as well as for understanding and predicting love phenomena are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, J. R. (1991). The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review, 98, 409-429.
2.
Aron, A. , & Aron, E. N. (1991). Love and sexuality. In K. McKinney & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Sexuality in close relationships (pp. 25-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Aron, A. , & Westbay, L. (1996). Dimensions of the prototype of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 535-551.
4.
Bardis, P. D. (1971). Erotometer: A technique for the measurement of heterosexual love. International Review of Sociology, 1, 71-77.
5.
Barsalou, L. W. (1987). The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 101-140). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Beall, A. E. , & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). The social construction of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 417-438.
7.
Berscheid, E. (1985). Interpersonal attraction. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 413-484). New York: Random House.
8.
Berscheid, E. (1988). Some comments on love's anatomy: Or, whatever happened to old-fashioned lust? In R. J. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 359-374). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
Berscheid, E. , & Meyers, S. A. (1996). A social categorical approach to a question about love. Personal Relationships, 3, 19-43.
10.
Berscheid, E. , & Walster [Hatfield], E. (1974). A little bit about love. In T. L. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (pp. 356-381). New York: Academic Press.
11.
Berscheid, E. , & Walster [Hatfield], E. (1978). Interpersonal attraction (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12.
Buss, D. M. (1988). Love acts: The evolutionary biology of love. In RJ. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 100-118). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
Byrne, D. (1977). Social psychology and the study of sexual behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 3-30.
14.
D'Andrade, R. G. (1989). Cultural cognition. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 795-830). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Davis, K. E. , & Todd, M. J. (1982). Friendship and love relationships. In K. E. Davis & T. O. Mitchell (Eds.), Advances in descriptive psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 79-112). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
16.
Fehr, B. (1988). Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 557-579.
17.
Fehr, B. (1994). Prototype-based assessment of laypeoples' views of love. Personal Relationships, 1, 309-331.
18.
Fehr, B. , & Russell, J. A. (1991). The concept of love viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 425-438.
19.
Hatfield, E. (1988). Passionate and companionate love. In R. J. Stern-berg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
Hatfield, E. , & Rapson, R. L. (1987). Passionate love/sexual desire: Can the same paradigm explain both?Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16, 259-278.
21.
Hatfield, E. , & Sprecher, S. (1986). Measuring passionate love in intimate relations. Journal of Adolescence, 9, 383-410.
22.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
23.
Hendrick, C. , & Hendrick, S. S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392-402.
24.
Hendrick, C. , & Hendrick, S. S. (1988). Lovers wear rose-colored glasses. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 161-183.
25.
Hendrick, C. , & Hendrick, S. S. (1989). Research on love: Does it measure up?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 784-794.
26.
Hendrick, S. S. , & Hendrick, C. (1987). Love and sex attitudes: A close relationship. In W. H. Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 1, pp. 141-169). London: JAI.
27.
Hendrick, S. S. , & Hendrick, C. (1992). Romantic love. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
28.
Hendrick, S. S. , & Hendrick, C. (1993). Lovers as friends. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 459-466.
29.
Kelley, H. H. (1983). Love and commitment. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau, & D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 265-314). New York: W. H. Freeman.
30.
Kephart, W. M. (1967). Some correlates of romantic love. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 29, 470-474.
31.
Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
32.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Leamer, L. (1986). As time goes by. New York: Harper & Row.
34.
MacGraw, A. (1991). Moving pictures. New York: Bantam.
35.
Meyers, S. A. , Ridge, R. D., & Berscheid, E. (1991). "Love" vs. "in love.' Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Minneapolis.
36.
Murstein, B. I. (1988). A taxonomy of love. In RJ. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 13-37). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37.
Neisser, U. (Ed.). (1987a). Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Neisser, U. (1987b). From direct perception to conceptual structure. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 11-24). New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Newcomb, T. M. (1968). Interpersonal balance. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & R. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally.
40.
Pam, A. , Plutchik, R., & Conte, H. R. (1975). Love: A psychometric approach. Psychological Reports, 37, 83-88.
41.
Reis, H. T. , & Wheeler, L. (1991). Studying social interaction with the Rochester Interaction Record. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 269-318). New York: Academic Press.
42.
Roth, E. M. , & Shoben, E. J. (1983). The effect of context on the structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 346-378.
43.
Rubin, Z. (1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265-273.
44.
Rubin, Z. (1988). Preface. In RJ. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. vii-xii). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
45.
Simpson, J. A. , Campbell, B., & Berscheid, E. (1986). The association between romantic love and marriage: Kephart (1967) twice revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 363-372.
46.
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119-135.
47.
Sternberg, R. J. , & Barnes, M. L. (Eds.). (1988). The psychology of love. New Haven, Ca: Yale University Press.
48.
Sternberg, R. J. , & Grajeck, S. (1984). The nature of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 312-329.
49.
Swenson, C. H. (1961). Love: A self-report analysis with college students. Journal of Individual Psychology, 17, 167-171.
50.
Walster [Hatfield], E. , & Walster, W. (1978). A new look at love. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
