Regrets appear to follow a systematic temporal pattern: Regrettable commissions loom larger in the short term, whereas regrettable omissions are more prominent in the long run. This research examines whether this pattern can be attributed in part to the Zeigarnik effect, or peoples' tendency to remember incompleted tasks better than completed tasks. Does Zeigarnik-like rumination over regrettable failures to act make them easier to recall, and thus more available as sources of regret? A survey found that people think about their biggest regrets of inaction more frequently than their biggest regrets of action. In two additional studies, participants listed their three biggest regrets of action and three biggest regrets of inaction, and then attempted to recall them several weeks later. As anticipated, participants remembered more of their regrettable omissions than their regrettable commissions, an effect that was maintained when the severity of the regrets was controlled statistically.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alper, T. G. (1946). Memory for completed and incompleted tasks as a function of personality: An analysis of group data. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 403-421.
2.
Boguslavsky, G. W. , & Guthrie, E. R. (1941). The recall of completed and incompleted activities: An investigation of Zeigarnik's experiment. Psychological Bulletin, 38, 575-576.
3.
Butteriield, E. C. (1964). The interruption of tasks: Methodological, factual, and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 62, 309-322.
4.
Eriksen, C. W. (1954). Psychological defenses and "ego strength" in recall of completed and incompleted tasks. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 45-50.
5.
Gilovich, T. , Kerr, M., & Medvec, V. H. (1993). Effect of temporal perspective on subjective confidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 552-560.
6.
Gilovich, T. , & Medvec, V. H. (1994). The temporal pattern to the experience of regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 357-365.
7.
Gilovich, T. , & Medvec, V. H. (1995a). The experience of regret: What, when, and why? Psychological Review, 102, 379-395.
8.
Gilovich, T. , & Medvec, V. H. (1995b). Some counterfactual determinants of satisfaction and regret. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Gilovich, T. , Medvec, V. H., & Chen, S. (1995). Commission, omission, and dissonance reduction: Coping with regret in the "Monty Hall" problem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 182-190.
10.
Gleicher, E. , Kost, K. A., Baker, S. M., Strathman, A. J., Richman, S. A., & Sherman, S. J. (1990). The role of counterfactual thinking in judgments of affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 284-295.
11.
Hattiangadi, N. , Medvec, V. H., & Gilovich, T. (1995). Failing to act Regrets of Terman's geniuses. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 40, 175-185.
12.
Kahneman, D. (1995). Varieties of counterfactual thinking. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Kahneman, D. , & Miller, D. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
14.
Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1982a). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246, 160-173.
15.
Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1982b). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heunstics and biases (pp. 201-208). Cambridge, UKCambridge University Press.
16.
Landman, J. (1987). Regret and elation following action and inaction: Affective responses to positive versus negative outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 524-536.
17.
Landman, J. (1993). Regret: Persistence of the possible. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Lecci, L. , Okun, M. A., & Karoly, P. (1994). Life regrets and current goals as predictors of psychological adjustment. Journal of Personaity and Social Psychology, 66, 731-741.
19.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.
20.
Marrow, A. J. (1938a). Goal tensions and recall: I. Journal of General Psychology, 19, 3-35.
21.
Marrow, A. J. (1938b). Goal tensions and recall: II. Journal of General Psychology, 19, 37-64.
22.
Martin, L. L. , & Tesser, A. (1989). Toward a motivational and structural theory of ruminative thought. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 306-326). New York: Guilford.
23.
Martin, L. L. , Tesser, A., & McIntosh, W. D. (1993). Wanting but not having: The effects of unattained goals on thoughts and feelings. In D. M. Wegner & J. W. Pennebaker (Eds.), Handbook of mental control (pp. 552-572). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
Miller, D. T. , & Taylor, B. R. (1995). Counterfactual thought, regret, and superstition: How to avoid kicking yourself. In N. J. Roese and J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Miller, D. T. , Turnbull, W., & McFarland, C. (1990). Counterfactual thinking and social perception: Thinking about what might have been. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 305-331). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26.
Pachauri, A. R. (1935). A study of gestalt problems in completed and interrupted tasks. British Journal of Psychology, 25, 447-457.
27.
Prentice, W. C. H. (1944). The interruption of tasks. Psychological Review, 51, 329-340.
28.
Rosenzweig, S. (1943). An experimental study of "repression" with special reference to need-persistive and ego-defensive reactions to frustration. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 64-74.
29.
Seifert, C. M. , & Patalano, A. L. (1991). Memory for incomplete tasks: A re-examination of the Zeigarnik Effect. In Program of the thirteenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 114-119). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.
31.
Tykocinski, O. E. , Pittman, T. S., & Tuttle, E. E. (1995). Inaction inertia Foregoing future benefits as a result of an initial failure to act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 793-803.
32.
Zeigarnik, B. (1935). On finished and unfinished tasks. In K. Lewin (Ed.), A dynamic theory of personality (pp. 300-314). New York: McGraw-Hill.
