Most cognitive approaches to word association and some theories of social cognition converge on the notion that the performance of repetitive behaviors should predict word association responses. To study this issue, the authors examined the frequencies of free-association responses of 1, 003 subjects to ambiguous words, some of which had subdominant senses that were linked to repetitive behaviors (e.g., draft and alcohol use). Results showed that three out of four measures of individual differences in repetitive behaviors significantly predicted responses for words linked to their respective behaviors. Gender, age, and language background were controlled for in these analyses. Although cognitive approaches suggested that an experimental manipulation of item presentation (grouped vs. randomly mixed items) should influence responses, this effect was not significant. Implications are discussed in terms of theories of lexical ambiguity and implicit influences of memory for previous experiences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
Bargh, J. A. , Bond, R. N., Lombardi, W. J., & Tota, M. E. (1986). The additive nature of chronic and temporary sources of construct accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 869-878.
3.
Bock, J. K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review, 89, 1-47.
4.
Cofer, C. N. (1967). Conditions for the use of verbal associations. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 1-12.
5.
Cramer, P. (1970). A study of homographs. In L. Postman & G. Keppel (Eds.) Norms of word association (pp. 361-382). New YorkAcademic Press.
6.
Fazio, R. H. , & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505-514.
7.
Higgins, E. T. , & King, G. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information-processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In N. Cantor & J. F. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction (pp. 69-121). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Hintzman, D. L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multiple trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
9.
Hopfield, J. J. , & Tank, D. W. (1986). Computing with neural circuits: A model. Science, 233, 625-633.
10.
Howes, D. , & Osgood, C. E. (1954). On the combination of associative probabilities in linguistic contexts. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 241-258.
11.
Jacoby, L. L. , & Kelley, C. M. (1992). A process-dissociation framework for investigating unconscious influences: Freudian slips, projective tests, subliminal perception, and signal detection theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 174-179.
12.
Jacoby, L. L. , & Witherspoon, D. (1982). Remembering without awareness. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 300-324.
13.
Lupker, S. J. (1984). Semantic priming without association: A second look. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 709-733.
14.
Marin, G. , Sabogal, F., Marin, B. V., Otero-Sabogal, R., & Perez-Stable, E. J. (1987). Development of a short acculturation scale for Hispanics. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 9, 183-205.
15.
Masson, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 3-23.
16.
Murray, D. M. , & Perry, C. L. (1987). The measurement of substance use among adolescents: When is the "bogus pipeline" method needed? Addictive Behaviors, 12, 225-233.
17.
Neil, W. T. , Hilliard, D. V., & Cooper, E. (1988). The detection of lexical ambiguity: Evidence for context-sensitive parallel access. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 279-287.
18.
Nelson, D. L. , McEvoy, C. L., Walling, J. R., & Wheeler, J. W. (1980). The University of South Florida homograph norms. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1216-37.
19.
Nelson, D. L. , Schreiber, T. A., & McEvoy, C. L. (1992). Processing implicit and explicit representations. Psychological Review, 99, 322-348.
20.
Paul, S. T. , Kellas, G., Martin, M., & Clark, M. B. (1992). Influence of contextual features on the activation of ambiguous word meanings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 703-717.
21.
Rapaport, D. (1946). Diagnostic psychological testing (Vol 2). Chicago: Year Book.
22.
Roediger, H. L. III . (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.
23.
Schacter, D. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501-518.
24.
Schacter, D. L. , Bowers, J., & Booker, J. (1989). Intention, awareness, and implicit memory: The retrieval internationality criterion. In S. Lewandowsky, J. C. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.), Implicit memory: Theoretical issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Schafer, R. (1945). A study of thought processes in a word association test. Character and Personality, 13, 212-227.
26.
Schwartz, F. , & Rouse, R. O. (1961). The activation and recovery of associations. Psychological Issues, 3, 1-141.
27.
Simpson, G. B. , & Burgess, C. (1985). Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(1), 28-39.
28.
Smith, E. R. (1984). Model of social inference processes. Psychological Review, 91, 392-413.
29.
Smith, E. R. (1991). Illusory correlation in a simulated exemplar-based memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 107-123.
30.
Smith, E. R. , & Zarate, M. A. (1992). Exemplar-based model of social judgment. Psychological Review, 99, 3-21.
31.
Spence, D. P. , & Owens, K. C. (1990). Lexical co-occurrence and association strength. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19, 317-330.
32.
Stacy, A. W. , Leigh, B. C., & Weingardt, K. R. (1993, November). An individual difference perspective applied to normative associative strength Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC.
33.
Stacy, A. W. , Widaman, K. F., Hays, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (1985). Validity of self-reports of alcohol and other drug use: A multitrait-multimethod assessment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 219-232.
34.
Szalay, L. B. , Inn, A., & Doherty, K. T. (1996). Social influences: Effects of the social environment on the use of alcohol and other drugs. Substance Use and Misuse, 31, 343-373.
35.
Tabossi, P. , & Zardon, F. (1993). Processing ambiguous words in contextJournal of Memory and Language, 32, 359-372.
36.
Toth, J. P. , Reingold, E. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Toward a redefinition of implicit memory: Process dissociations following elaborative processing and self-generation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 290-303.
