Social identity theory (SIT) proposes that disadvantaged group members take collective action only when intergroup boundaries are believed to be impermeable and in-group status is perceived as illegitimate and unstable. In North America, the actual permeability of intergroup boundaries is often ambiguous, and decisions to take collective action are made against a dominant ideology of individual mobility. This research used the context of tokenism-highly restricted boundary permeability-to reflect this social reality and to test the impact of referent informational influence and information from a salient out-group on endorsement of collective action. In Experiment 1, information from an in-group member describing tokenism as illegitimate and demonstrating a norm of anger increased interest in collective action. In Experiment 2, messages from the advantaged out-group focusing attention on collective injustice also increased interest in collective behavior. Findings support SIT; while highlighting the impact of socially relevant influences on interest in collective action.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrams, D. , & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Social identity, self-categorization and social influence. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 195-228.
2.
Abrams, D. , Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119.
3.
Apfelbaum, E. (1979). Relations of domination and movements for liberation: An analysis of power between groups. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 188-204). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
4.
Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and submission to group pressure: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70, 1-70.
5.
Baron, R. S. , Vancello, J. A., & Brunsmam, B. (1996). The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 915-927.
6.
Brewer, M. B. , & Miller, N. (1996). Intergroup relations. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
7.
Crocker, J. , & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem; The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
8.
David, B. , & Turner, J. C. (1996). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: Is being a member of the out-group an advantage?British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 179-199.
9.
Deutsch, M. , & Gerard, H. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
10.
Diehl, M. (1989). Justice and discrimination between minimal groups: The limits of equity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 227-238.
11.
Dube', L. , & Guimond, S. (1986). Relative deprivation and social protest: The personal-group issue. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4, pp. 210-216). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Ellemers, N. , van Knippenberg, A., de Vries, M., & Wilke, H. (1988). Social identification and permeability of group boundaries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 497-513.
13.
Ellemers, N. , van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233-246.
14.
Ellemers, N. , Wilke, H., & van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of legitimacy of low group and individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766-778.
15.
Farley, R. (1985). Three steps forward and two back?Ethnic and Racial Studies, 8, 4-28.
16.
Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
17.
Folger, R. , Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., & Corkran, L. (1972). Effects of "voice" and peer opinions on responses to inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2253-2261.
18.
Grant, P. R. , & Brown, R. (1995). From ethnocentrism to collective protest: Responses to relative deprivation and threats to social identity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 195-211.
19.
Haslam, S. A. , McGarty, C., & Turner, J. C. (1996). Salient group memberships and persuasion: The role of social identity in the validation of beliefs. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. New York: New York University Press.
21.
Hogg, M. A. , & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identification: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. New York: Rutledge.
22.
Kelly, C. (1993). Group identification, intergroup perceptions and collective action. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 59-83.
23.
Klandersmans, P. G. (1989). Grievance interpretation and success expectations: The social construction of protest. Social Behavior, 4, 113-125
24.
Lalonde, R. N. , & Silverman, R. A. (1994). Behavioral preferences in response to social injustice: The effects of group permeability and social identity salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 78-85.
25.
Lord, C. G. , & Saenz, D. S. (1985). Memory deficits and memory surfeits: Differential cognitive consequences of tokenism for token and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 918-926.
26.
Mackie, D. M. , Gastardo-Conaco, M. C., & Skelly, J. J. (1992). Knowledge of the advocated position and the processing of in-group and out-group persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 145-151.
27.
Mackie, D. M. , Worth, L. T., & Asuncion, A. G. (1990). Processing of persuasive in-group messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 812-822.
28.
Martin, J. (1986). The tolerance of injustice. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4, pp. 217-242). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Martin, J. , Brickman, P., & Murray, A. (1984). Moral outrage and pragmatism: Explanations for collective action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 484-496.
30.
Moreland, J. K. (1965). Token desegregation and beyond. In A. M. Rose, & C. B. Rose (Eds.), Minority problems (pp. 229-238). New York: Harper & Row.
31.
Ng, S. H. (1982). Power and intergroup discrimination. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 179-206). London: Cardiff University Press.
32.
Pettigrew, T. F. , & Martin, J. (1987). Shaping the organizational context for Black American inclusion. Journal of Social Issues, 43, 41-78.
33.
Petty, R. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
34.
Pinard, M. , & Hamilton, R. (1986). Motivational dimensions in the Quebec independence movement A test of a new model. In L. Kriesberg (Ed.), Research in social movements, conflicts and change (Vol. 9, pp. 225-280). Greenwich, CI:JAI.
35.
Reicher, S. D. , Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 161-198). Chichester, UKWiley.
36.
Sachdev, I. , & Bourhis, R. Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1-24.
37.
Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper & Brothers.
38.
Sidanius, J. (1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression: A social dominance perspective. In S. Iyengar, & W. J. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 183-219). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
39.
Smith, E. R. , & Henry, S. (1996). An in-group becomes part of the self: Response-time evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 635-642.
40.
Tajfel, H. (1975). The exit of social mobility and the voice of social change: Notes on the social psychology of intergroup relations. Social Science Informal14, 101-118.
41.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
43.
Taylor, D. M. , & McKirnan, D. J. (1984). A five stage model of intergroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 291-300.
44.
Terry, D. J. , & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776-793.
45.
Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
46.
Turner, J. C. , & Brown, R. (1978). Social status, cognitive alternatives and intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 201-234). San Diego, CAAcademic Press.
47.
Van Knippenberg, A. (1989). Strategies of identity management In J. P. Van Oudenhoven & T. M. Willemsen (Eds.), Ethnic minorities: Social-psychological perspectives (pp. 59-76). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
48.
Walker, I. , & Pettigrew, T. F. (1984). Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 301-310.
49.
Wilder, D. A. (1990). Some determinants of the persuasive power of in-groups and out-groups: Organization of information and attribution of independence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1202-1213.
50.
Wright, S. C. (1995, June). Responding to restricted group boundiers: An analysis of tokenism. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Social Justice Research, Reno, NV.
51.
Wright, S. C. , & Taylor, D. M. (in press). Responding to tokenism: Individual action in the face of collective injustice. European journal of Social Psychology.
52.
Wright, S. C. , Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990a). The relationship of perceptions and emotions to behavior in the face of collective inequality. Social Justice Research, 4, 229-250.
53.
Wright, S. C. , Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990b). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.
