Participants viewed a videotape of a person who expressed verbal statements accompanied by neutral, happy, or angry facial displays. These statements could be used to quickly stereotype the person (heuristic processing). Alternatively, these statements could be processed in a piecemeal manner for purposes of judging the person (systematic processing). Among low-motivation participants, neutral displays elicited systematic processing, whereas happy displays elicited heuristic processing. Angry displays elicited a processing style falling between these extremes. Highly motivated participants processed the verbal statements in a systematic manner regardless of the target's facial expression. These results correspond to findings reported in the mood literature, and the differences obtained for low- and high-motivation participants support a cognitive tuning account of the mediating process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, N. H. (1974). Cognitive algebra: Integration theory applied to social attribution. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press.
2.
Bless, H. , Bohner, G., Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1990). Mood and persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 331-345.
3.
Bodenhausen, G. V. , Kramer, G. P., & Susser, K. (1994). Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 621-632.
4.
Bodenhausen, G. V. , Sheppard, L. A., & Kramer, G. P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 45-62.
5.
Bugental, D. B. , Henker, B., & Whalen, C. K. (1976). Attributional antecedents of verbal and vocal assertiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 405-411.
6.
Bugental, D. E. (1974). Interpretations of naturally occurring discrepancies between words and intonation: Models of inconsistency resolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 125-133.
7.
Bugental, D. E. , Kaswan, J. W., & Love, L. R. (1970). Perception of contradictory meanings conveyed by verbal and nonverbal channels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 647-655.
8.
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
9.
Clore, G. L. , Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition Vol. 1. Basic processes (pp. 323-418). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Cohen, J. (1978). Partialled products are interactions: Partialled powers are curve components. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 858-866.
11.
Cohen, J. , & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression: Correlational analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Conover, P. J. , & Feldman, S. (1984). How people organize the political world: A schematic model. American Journal of Political Science, 28, 95-126.
13.
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). New York: Free Press.
14.
Ekman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48, 384-392.
15.
Ekman, P. , Davidson, R. J., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). The Duchenne smile: Emotional expression and brain physiology II. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 342-353.
16.
Ekman, P. , O'Sullivan, M., Friesen, W. V., & Scherer, K. R. (1991). Face, voice, and body in detecting deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 125-135.
17.
Evans, M. G. (1991). The problem of analyzing multiplicative composites. American Psychologist, 46, 17-29.
18.
Fishbein, M. , & Coombs, F. S. (1974). Basis for decision: An attitudinal analysis of voting behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 95-124.
19.
Fiske, S. T. , & Neuberg, S. L. (1989). A continuum model of impression formation from category-based to individuating responses: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic Press.
20.
Frank, M. G. , Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1993). Behavioral markers and recognizability of the smile of enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 83-93.
21.
Fridlund, A. J. (1994). Human facial expression: An evolutionary view. San Diego, CA, Academic Press.
22.
Isen, A. M. , & Means, B. (1983). The influence of positive affect on decision-making strategy. Social Cognition, 218-31.
23.
Iyengar, S. , & Ottati, V. (1994). Cognitive perspective in political psychology. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Vol. 2. Applications (pp. 143-188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Kinder, D. R. (1986). Presidential character revisited. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 233-256). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Kruglanski, A. W. , & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 19, 448-468.
26.
Lodge, M. , McGraw, K., & Stroh, P. (1989). First impressions count: An information processing account of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 83, 399-420.
27.
Mackie, D. M. , & Worth, L. (1989). Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 27-40.
28.
Martin, L. L. , Ward, D. W., Ache, J. W., & Wyer, R. S. (1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1-10.
29.
McGraw, K. M. , Lodge, M., & Stroh, P. (1990). On-line processing in candidate evaluation: The effects of issue order, issue importance, and sophistication. Political Behavior, 12, 41-58.
30.
Mehrabian, A. , & Ferris, S. R. (1967). Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 248-252.
31.
O'Sullivan, M. , Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Scherer, K. R. (1988). The effect of comparisons on detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 203-215.
32.
Ottati, V. , & Isbell, L. (1996). Effects of mood during exposure to target information on misjudgments: An on-line of misattribution and correction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 39-53.
33.
Schwarz, N. (1990). Happy but mindless? Mood effects on problem-solving and persuasion. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol.2, pp. 527-561). New York: Guilford.
34.
Schwarz, N. , & Bless, B. (1991). Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective states on analytic reasoning. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Emotion and social judgment (pp. 55-71). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
35.
Schwarz, N. , Bless, H., & Bohner, G. (1991). Mood and persuasion: Affective states influence the processing of persuasive communications. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 161-199). San Diego, CA:-Academic Press.
36.
Sinclair, R. C. , & Mark, M. M. (1991). Mood and the endorsement of egalitarian macrojustice versus equity-based microjustice principles. Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 369-375.
37.
Sinclair, R. C. , & Mark, M. M. (1992). The influence of mood state on judgment and action: Effects on persuasion, categorization, social justice, person perception, and judgmental accuracy. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 165-193). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
Sinclair, R. C. , Mark, M. M., & Clore, G. L. (1994). Mood-related persuasion depends on (mis)attributions. Social Cognition, 121-18.
39.
Soldat, A. S. , Sinclair, R. C., & Mark, M. M. (1997). Color as an environmental processing cue: External affective cues can directly affect processing strategy without affecting mood. Social Cognition, 15, 55-71.
40.
Wegener, D. T. , & Petty, R. E. (1994). Mood management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1034-1048.
41.
Wyer, R. S. , Shavitt, S., Riggle, E., Melton, R. J., & Kuklinski, J. K. (1991). Image, issues, and ideology: The processing of information about political candidates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 533-545.
