We hypothesized that partisans who represent power and the status quo would judge their opponents less accurately than would partisans seeking change, who would be stereotyped as extremists. We surveyed the attitudes and book preferences of traditionalist and revisionist English professors, who differed in their inclinations to preserve or change the literary status quo. Both groups overestimated the differences in their attitudes and book preferences, the extremity of their opponent's conviction, and the numerical balances of the two sides. Consistent with the status quo hypotheses, traditionalists were more prone to polarize the two sides' attitudes and underestimate the book preferences they shared with their opponents, and both sides attributed more extreme convictions to revisionists. Discussion focused on mechanisms related to power-related biases.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. New York: Prentice Hall.
2.
Bar-Tal, D., & Geva, N. (1986). A cognitive basis of international conflicts. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 118-133). Chicago: Nelson Hall.
3.
Berman, P. (Ed.). (1992). Debating PC. New York: Laurel Trade.
4.
Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
5.
Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
6.
Brewer, M. B. (1986). The role of ethnocentrism in intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of interpersonal relations (pp. 88-102). Chicago: Nelson Hall.
7.
Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1985). The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 219-243.
8.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1961). The mirror-image in Soviet-American relations. Journal of Social Issues, 17, 45-56.
9.
Chance, M. (1967). Attention structure as the basis of primate rank orders. Man, 2, 503-518.
10.
D'Souza, D. (1991). Illiberal education: The politics of race and sex on campus. New York: Vintage Books.
11.
Ebenbach, D. H., & Keltner, D. (1996). Power, emotion, and bias in social conflict: Motivating the cognitive miser. Manuscript submitted for publication.
12.
Ellyson, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.). (1985). Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
13.
Emory, G. R. (1988). Social geometry and cohesion in three primate species. In M. RA Chance (Ed.), Social fabrics of mind (pp. 47-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Erber, R., & Fiske, S. T. (1984). Outcome dependency and attention to inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 709-726.
15.
Fiske, S. (1993). Controlling other people. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
16.
French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
17.
Gruenfeld, D. G. (1995). Status, ideology, and integrative complexity on the U.S. Supreme Court: Rethinking the politics of political decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 5-20.
18.
Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril, H. (1954). They saw a game: A case study. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 129-134.
20.
Hunter, J. D. (1991). Culture wars: The struggle to define America. New York: Basic Books.
21.
Ichheiser, G. (1970). Appearances and realities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
23.
Judd, C. M., & Johnson, J. T. (1983). Attitudes, polarization, and diagnosticity: Exploring the effect of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 26-36.
24.
Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1993). Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes. Psychological Review, 100, 109-128.
25.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
26.
Keltner, D., & Ebenbach, D. H. (1996). The influence of social status on social behavior and social perception. Manuscript in preparation.
27.
Keltner, D., & Robinson, R. J. (1993). Imagined ideological differences in conflict escalation and resolution. International Journal of Conflict Management, 4, 249-262.
28.
Keltner, D., & Robinson, R. J. (1996). Extremism, power, and the imagined basis of social conflict. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 101-105.
29.
Levine, J. M., & Russo, R. M. (in press). Impact of anticipated interaction on information acquisition. Social Cognition.
30.
Levine, R. A., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes and group behavior. New York: John Wiley.
31.
Mullen, B., & Hu, L. (1989). Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Psychology, 10(3), 233-252.
32.
Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
33.
Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23-32.
34.
Ng, S. H., & Cram, F. (1988). Intergroup bias by defensive and offensive groups in majority and minority conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 749-757.
35.
Plant, E. A., Hyde, J. S., Keltner, D., & Devine, P. (1996). The gender stereotyping of emotions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
36.
Plous, S. (1985). Perceptual illusions and military realities. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29, 363-389.
37.
Robinson, R., & Keltner, D. (1996). Much ado about nothing? Revisionists and traditionalists choose an English syllabus. Psychological Science, 7(1), 18-24.
38.
Robinson, R., Keltner, D., Ward, A., & Ross, L. (1995). Actual versus assumed differences in construal: "Naive realism" in intergroup perception and conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 404-417.
39.
Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
40.
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1985). Social categorization and power differentials in intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 415-434.
41.
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1987). Status differentials and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 277-293.
42.
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1-24.
43.
Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 527-561). New York: Guilford.
44.
Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 249-288). New York: Academic Press.
45.
Tetlock, P. (1981). Pre-to post-election shifts in presidential rhetoric: Impression management or cognitive adjustment? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 207-212.
46.
Thompson, L., & Hrebec, D. (in press). The incompatibility effect in interdependent decision making. Psychological Bulletin.
47.
Worchel, S., & Austin, W. G. (Eds.). (1986). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Chicago: Nelson Hall.
48.
Zdaniuk, B., & Levine, J. M. (1996). Anticipated interaction and thought generation: The role of faction size. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 201-218.
