Attitude embeddedness, defined as the degree of connectedness of an attitude to other cognitive elements, was operationalized as the number of free associations subjects produced in relation to the attitude issue. Two experiments demonstrated that embeddedness moderated the effects of general attitudes on specific attitudes in situations that were ambiguously related to general attitudes. Highly embedded general attitudes but not low-embedded general attitudes toward capital punishment or the right to die served as a basis for the formation of specific evaluations of situations that were only moderately relevant for the broader issue. A third experiment demonstrated that highly embedded attitudes toward preservation of the environment were more strongly related to behavioral intentions than low-embedded attitudes were.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aiken, L. S. , & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and inter-preting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Anderson, J. R. , & Pirolli, P. L. (1984). Spread of activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 791-798.
3.
Biek, M. , Wood, W., Chaiken, S., & Nations, C. (1993). Working knowledge, cognitive processing, and attitudes: On the determinants of bias. Unpublished manuscript, Texas A&M University.
4.
Blumer, H. (1955). Attitudes and the social act. Social Problems, 3, 59-65.
5.
Bruner, J. S. (1957). Going beyond the information given. In H. Gruber, K. R. Hammond, & R. Jesser (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to cognition (pp. 41-69). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Budd, R. J. , & Spencer, C. (1984). Latitude of rejection, centrality, and certainty: Variables affecting the relationship between attitudes, norms, and behavioral intentions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 1-8.
7.
Cacioppo, J. T. , & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
8.
Chaiken, S. , & Baldwin, M. W. (1981). Affective-cognitive consistency and the effect of salient behavioral information on the self-perception of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1-12.
9.
Chaiken, S. , Pomerantz, E. M., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (in press). Structural consistency and attitude strength. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Cohen, J. , & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analyses for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Crano, W. D. , & Prislin, R. (1995). Components of vested interest and attitude-behavior consistency. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 1-21.
12.
Eagly, A. H. , & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace jovanovich.
13.
Fishbein, M. , & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14.
French, V. (1947). The structure of sentiment. Journal of Personality, 15, 247-282.
15.
French, V. (1948). The structure of sentiment. Journal of Personality, 16, 78-100, 209-244.
16.
Gabrys, G. (1989). HEIDER A simulation of attitude consistency and attitude change. In S. Ohlsson (Ed.), Aspects of cognitive conflict and cognitive change (Tech. Rep. No. KUL-89-04). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.
17.
Graziano, W. (1987). Lost in thought at the choice point: Cognition, context, and equality. In J. C. Masters & W. P. Smith (Eds.), Social comparison, social justice, and relative deprivation: Theoretical empirical, and policy perspectives (pp. 265-294). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Holyoak, K. J. , & Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 3, 295-355.
19.
Hovland, C. I. , & Sherif, M. (1952) .Judgmental phenomena and scales of attitude measurement: Items displacement in Thurstone scales. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 822-832.
20.
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace.
21.
Kfhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.
22.
Krech, D. , & Crutchfield, R. S. (1948). Theory and problems of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
Lord, C. G. , Desforges, D. M., Fein, S., Pugh, M. A., & Lepper, M. (1994). Typicality effects in attitudes toward social policies: A concept-mapping approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 658-673.
24.
Miller, L. C. , & Read, S. J. (1991). On the coherence of mental models of persons and relationships: A knowledge structure approach. In F. Fincham & GJ. O. Fletcher (Eds.), Cognition in close relationships (pp. 69-99). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Morris, R. G. M. (Ed.). (1989). Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
26.
Petty, R. E. , & Krosnick, J. A. (in press). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Prislin, R. (1986). Tolerance to attitudinal inconsistency, magnitude of reward and attitude change. Studia Psychologica, 28, 49-56.
28.
Prislin, R. (1988). Attitude-behavior relationship: Attitude saliency and implications of behavior. Psychologische Beiträge, 30, 129-138.
29.
Prislin, R. (in press). Attitude stability and attitude strength: One is enough to make it strong. European Journal of Social Psychology.
30.
Read, S. J. , & Miller, L. C. (1994). Dissonance and balance in belief systems: The promise of parallel constraint satisfaction processes and connectionist modeling approaches. In R. C. Shank & E. Langer (Eds.), Beliefs, reasoning and decision making (pp. 209-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
Rosenberg, M. J. (1960). An analysis of affective-cognitive consistency. In C. I. Hovland & M. J. Rosenberg (Eds.), Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
Rumelhart, D. E. , McClelland, J. L., & the PDP. Research Group. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
Schultz, T. R. , & Lepper, M. R. (1992). A constraint satisfaction model of cognitive dissonance phenomena. In Proceedings of the 13th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 462-467). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Scott, W. A. (1959). Attitude change by response reinforcement: Replication and extension. Sociometry, 22, 219-229.
35.
Scott, W. A. (1968). Attitude measurement. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 204-273). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
36.
Sherman, S. J. , Presson, C. C., Chassin, L., Bensenberg, M., Corty, E., & Oslavsky, R. W. (1982). Smoking intentions in adolescents: Direct experience and predictability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 376-383.
37.
Shipley, W. C. (1940). A self-administering scale for measuring intellectual impairment and deterioration. Journal of Psychology, 9, 371-377.
38.
Snyder, M. (1974). The self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
39.
Snyder, M. (1982). When believing means doing: Creating links between attitudes and behavior. In M. P. Zanna, E. T. Higgins, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Consistency in social behavior: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 2 (pp. 105-130). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
Snyder, M. , & Krendzierski, D. (1982). Acting on one's attitudes: Procedures for linking attitudes to behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 165-183.
41.
Spellman, B. A. , & Holyoak, K. J. (1992). If Saddam is Hitler then who is George Bush: Analogical mapping between systems of social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 913-933.
42.
Spellman, B. A. , Ullman, J. B., & Holyoak, K. J. (1993). A coherence model of cognitive consistency: Dynamics of attitude change during the Persian Gulf war. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4), 147-165.
43.
Stevens, S. S. (1975). Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. New York: John Wiley.
44.
Thurstone, L. L. (1929). The measurement of attitude: A psychophysical method and some experiments with a scale for measuring attitude toward the church. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25(4), 41-78.
46.
Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1989). Selective attention, variable processing, and distributed representation: Preserving particular experiences of general structures. In R. G. M. Morris (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology (pp. 76-101). Ox-ford, UK: Clarendon.
47.
Wood, W. (1982). Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 246-259.
48.
Wood, W. , Prislin, R., & Pool, G. (1995). Attitude formation: Structural consistency and the deduction of specific from general attitudes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
