This article adapts the assumptions of the continuum model of impression formation to address the development of shared impressions in dyads. Two experiments tested the additional assumption that the development of shared impressions depends on consensus motivation. Consensus motivation should focus conversation around stereotype-consistent information and encourage shared stereotypic impressions. However, when dyads are motivated by both consensus and accuracy, they should increase focus on stereotype-inconsistent information, then form shared individuated impressions. In both experiments, hypotheses generally were confirmed regarding consensus motivation. However, hypotheses regarding accuracy motivation met with mixed success; individuating processes were detected but failed to encourage individuated impressions. The discussion explores reasons why these experiments provide only partial support for the extended continuum model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allport, G. A. (1979). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. (Original work published 1954)
2.
Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70(416).
3.
Blum, T. C. , Roman, P. M., & Bennett, N. (1989). Public images of alcoholism: Data from a Georgia survey. Journal of Studies on Alcohol; 50, 5-14.
4.
Clark, H. H. , & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5.
Clark, H. H. , & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10-63). Cambridge, UKCambridge University Press.
6.
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
7.
Dovidio, J. F. , Evans, N., & Tyler, R. G. (1986). Racial stereotypes: The contents of their cognitive representations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 22-37.
8.
Erber, R. , & Fiske, S. T. (1984). Outcome dependency and attention to inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 709-726.
9.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 1, 117-140.
10.
Fiske, S. T. , & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation from category-based to individuating processes: Influence of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1-74). New York: Academic Press.
11.
Fiske, S. T. , Neuberg, S. L., Beattie, A. E., & Milberg, S. J. (1987). Category-based and attribute-based reactions to others: Some informational conditions of stereotyping and individuating processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 399-427.
12.
Fiske, S. T. , & Pavelchak, M. A. (1986). Category-based versus piece-meal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 167-203). New York: Guilford.
13.
Fiske, S. T. , & Ruscher, J. B. (1989). On-line processes in category-based and individuating impressions: Some basic principles and methodological reflections. In J. N. Bassili (Ed.), On-line cognition in person perception (pp. 141-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Fiske, S. T. , & Von Hendy, H. H. M. (1992). Personality feedback and situational norms can control stereotyping processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 577-596.
15.
Funder, D. C. (1987). Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 75-90.
16.
Gigone, D. , & Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 959-974.
17.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
18.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation: The William James Lectures. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press.
19.
Hammer, E. D. , & Ruscher, J. B. (1994, July). Conversing dyads generate external causal explanations for target-unexpected outcomes. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.
20.
Hastie, R. , & Pennington, N. (1991). Cognitive and social processes in decision making. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 308-327). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21.
Higgins, E. T. (1981). The "communication game": Implications of social cognition. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 343-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Hogg, M. A. , Turner, J. C., & Davidson, B. (1990). Polarized norms and social frames of reference: A test of the self-categorization theory of group polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 77-100.
23.
Ickes, W. J. , Stinson, L., Bissonnette, V., & Garcia, S. (1990). Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 730-742.
24.
Kenny, D. A. , & La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 141-182). New York: Academic Press.
25.
Kleck, R. E. (1968). Physical stigma and nonverbal cues emitted in face-to-face interaction. Human Relations, 21, 19-28.
26.
Krauss, R. M. , & Fussell, S. R. (1991). Constructing shared communicative environments. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 172-200). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
27.
Kruglanski, A. W. , Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 861-876.
28.
Langer, E. J. , Fiske, S. T., Taylor, S. E., & Chanowitz, B. (1976). Stigma, staring, and discomfort: A novel stimulus hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 451-463.
29.
Laughlin, P. R. , & Earley, P. C. (1982). Social combination models, persuasive argument theory, social comparison theory, and choice shift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177-189.
30.
Levine, J. M. , Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585-612.
31.
Macrae, C. N. , Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B., & Jetten, J. (1994). Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 808-817.
32.
Marks, G. , & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 72-90.
33.
Moscovici, S. (1985). Social influence and conformity. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 347-412). New York: Random House.
34.
Neuberg, S. L. , & Fiske, S. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 431-444.
35.
Ruscher, J. B. , & Fiske, S. T. (1990). Interpersonal competition can cause individuating impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 832-843.
36.
Ruscher, J. B. , & Hammer, E. D. (1994). Revising disrupted impressions through conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 530-541.
37.
Stangor, C. , & McMillan, D. (1992). Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 42-61.
38.
Stasser, G. , Taylor, L. A., & Hanna, C. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 67-78.
39.
Stevens, L. E. , & Fiske, S. T. (1995, June). Powerless people form motivated impressions of power holders. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, New York.
40.
Tetlock, P. E. , & Boettger, R. (1989). Accountability: A social magnifier of the dilution effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 388-398.
41.
Vinokur, A. , & Burnstein, E. (1974). Effects of partially shared persuasive arguments on group-induced shifts: A group problem-solving approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 305-315.
42.
Wegner, D. M. , Guiliano, T., & Hertel, P. W. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 253-276). New York: Springer.
43.
West, S. G. , Newsom, J. T., & Fenaughty, A. M. (1992). Publication trends in JPSP: Stability and change in topics, methods, and theories across two decades. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 473-484.
44.
Wood, W. , Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.
45.
Zajonc, R. B. (1960). The process of cognitive tuning in communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 159-167.
