The dispositionist bias manifests itself when (a) behavior is over attributed to dispositions and (b) contextual factors are underused when predicting behavior. The psychological processes underlying the former bias have been more thoroughly examined than the latter. Three studies support the hypothesis that the trait implications of past behavior function as heuristics used to predict high levels of cross-situational consistency. Subjects in Experiment 1 used both dispositional and situational information to predict behavior, but the level of consistency predicted was inversely related to how much time was spent integrating the available information. In Experiment 2, attributionally complex subjects were less likely to predict high levels of behavioral consistency and were more sensitive to the context in which behavior was to occur. Imposing a cognitive load in Experiment 3 increased noncomplex subjects' tendency to predict consistency across situations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Axsom, D. , Yates, S., & Chaiken, S. (1987). Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 30-40.
2.
Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. InJ. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 3-51). New York: Guilford.
3.
Bargh, J. A. , & Thein, R. D. (1985). Individual construct accessibility, person memory, and the recall-judgment link: The case of information overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1129-1146.
4.
Bargh, J. A. , & Tota, M. E. (1988). Context-dependent automatic processing in depression: Accessibility of negative constructs with regard to self but not others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 925-939.
5.
Bassili, J. N. (1993). Procedural efficiency and the spontaneity of trait inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 200-205.
6.
Bodenhausen, G. V. (1993). Emotions, arousal, and stereotypic judgments: A heuristic model of affect and stereotyping. In D. Mackie & D. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotying: Interactive processes in intergroup perception (pp. 13-37). San Diego, CA; Academic Press.
7.
Cacioppo, J. T. , & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
8.
Chaiken, S. , Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. InJ. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford.
9.
Cohen, J. , & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Craik, F. I. M. , & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A frame-work for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
11.
D'Agostino, P. R. , & Fincher-Kiefer, R. (1992). Need for cognition and the correspondence bias. Social Cognition, 10, 151-163.
12.
Dawes, R. M. (1993). Prediction of the future versus an understanding of the past: A basic asymmetry. Amenican Journal of Psychology, 106, 1-24.
13.
Devine, P. G. (1989). Over attribution effect: The role of confidence and attributional complexity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 149-158.
14.
Dunning, D. , Griffin, D. W., Milojkovic, J., & Ross, L. (1990). The overconfidence effect in social prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 568-581.
15.
Epstein, S. , & Teraspulsky, L. (1986). Perception of cross-situational consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1152-1160.
16.
Fiske, S. T. , & Taylor, S. E. (1991) Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
Fletcher, G. J. O. , Danilovics, P., Fernandez, G., Peterson, D., & Reeder, G. D. (1986). Attributional complexity: An individual differences measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 875-884.
18.
Fletcher, G. J. O. , Grigg, E., & Bull, V. (1988). The organization and accuracy of personality impressions: Neophytes versus experts in trait attribution. New Zeal and Journal of Psychology, 17, 68-77.
19.
Fletcher, G. J. O. , Reeder, G. D., & Bull, V. (1990). Bias and accuracy in attitude attribution: The role of attributional complexity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 275-288.
20.
Fletcher, G. J. O. , Rosanowski, J., Rhodes, G., & Lange, C. (1992). Accuracy and speed of causal processing: Experts versus novices in social judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 320-338.
21.
Gilbert, D. T. (1989). Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. InJ. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 189-211). New York: Guilford.
22.
Gilbert, D. T. , & Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509-517.
23.
Gilbert, D. T. , & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38.
24.
Gilbert, D. T. , & Osborne, R. E. (1989). Thinking backward: Some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 940-949.
25.
Gilbert, D. T. , Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733-740.
26.
Harvey, J. H. , Yarkin, K. L., Lightner, J. M., & Town, J. P. (1980). Unsolicited interpretation and recall of interpersonal events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 551-568.
27.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
28.
Higgins, E. T. , & Bargh, J. A. (1987). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 369-425.
29.
Higgins, E. T. , & King, G. A. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In N. Cantor & J. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction (pp. 69-121). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Jones, E. E. (1979). The rocky road from acts to dispositions. American Psychologist434, 107-117.
31.
Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: W. H. Freeman.
32.
Jones, E. E. , & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1-24.
33.
Kantowitz, B. H. (1974). Double stimulation. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 83-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Krull, D. S. (1993). Does the grist change the mill? The effect of the perceiver's inferential goal on the process of social inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 340-348.
35.
Kunda, Z. , & Nisbett, R. E. (1986). The psychometrics of everyday life. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 195-224.
36.
Locksley, A. , & Stangor, C. (1984). Why versus how often: Causal reasoning and the incidence of judgmental bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 470-483.
37.
Markus, H. R. , & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
38.
Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961-978.
39.
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York:John Wiley.
40.
Morris, M. W. ; & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971.
41.
Newman, L. S. (1990). The stable disposition concept and spontaneous trait inference: Developmental and individual differences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.
42.
Newman, L. S. (1991). Why are traits inferred spontaneously? A developmental approach. Social Cognition, 9, 221-253.
43.
Newman, L. S. (1993). How individualists interpret behavior: Idiocentrism and spontaneous trait inference. Social Cognition, 11, 243-269.
44.
Newman, L. S. , & Uleman, J. S. (1993). When are you what you did? Behavior identification and dispositional inference in person memory, attribution, and social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 513-525.
45.
Nisbett, R. E. (1980). The trait construct in lay and professional psychology. In L. Festinger (Ed.), Retrospections on social psychology (pp. 109-130). New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
Nisbett, R. E. (1987). Lay personality theory: Its nature, origin, and utility. In N. E. Grunberg, R. E. Nisbett, J. Rodin, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), A distinctive approach to psychological research: The influence of Stanley Schachter (pp. 87-117) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
Pelham, B. W. , Sumarta, T. T., & Myaskovsky, L. (1994). The easy path from many to much: The numerosity heuristic. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 103-133.
48.
Pittman, T. S. , & Heller, J. F. (1987). Social motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 8, 461-489.
49.
Rholes, W. S. , Newman, L. S., & Ruble, D. N. (1990). Understanding self and other: Developmental and motivational aspects of perceiving persons in terms of invariant dispositions. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 369-407). New York: Guilford.
50.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173-220). New York: Academic Press.
51.
Ross, L. (1987). The problem of construal in social inference and social psychology. In N. E. Grunberg, R. E. Nisbett,J. Rodin, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), A distinctive approach to psychological research: The influence of Stanley Schachter (pp. 118-150). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52.
Ross, L. , Amabile, T. M., & Steinmetz, J. L. (1977). Social roles, Social control, and biases in social-perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 485-494.
53.
Ross, L. , & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
54.
Sherman, S. J. , & Corty, E. (1984). Cognitive heuristics. In R. S. Wyer, Jr., & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of -social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 189-286). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55.
Shoda, Y. , & Mischel, W. (1993). Cognitive social approach to dispositional inferences: What if the perceiver is a cognitive social theorist?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 574-585.
56.
Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environ-ment. Psychological Review, 63, 129-138.
57.
Smith, E. R. , Branscombe, N. R., & Bormann, C. (1988). Generality of the effects of practice on social judgment tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 385-395.
58.
Srull, T. K. (1984). Methodological techniques for the study of person memory and social cognition. In R. S. Wyer,Jr., & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 1-72). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59.
Stalder, D. R. (1993, April). Are logical people attributionaly complex? A study of mathematicians. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
60.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
61.
Tetlock, P. E. , & Boettger, R. (1989). Accountability: A social magnifier of the dilution effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 388-398.
62.
Trafimow, D. , & Schneider, D. J. (1994). The effects of behavioral, situational, and person information on different attribution judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 351-369.
63.
Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
64.
Verplanken, B. (1993). Need for cognition and external information search: Responses to time pressure during decision-making. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 238-252.
65.
Wilson, T. D. , & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspec-tion can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181-192.
