Three experiments obtained evidence that spontaneous trait inferences (STIs) occur on-line, at encoding. In each, participants read many sentences on a computer screen. After each paragraph, they indicated whether it included a test probe word. Paragraphs that imply but do not contain traits should increase errors or reaction times (RTs) to trait probes. In Experiment 1, trait-implying paragraphs produced more errors than control paragraphs, supporting the hypothesis. In Experiments 2 and 3, with feedback on each trial, longer RTs supported the hypothesis. STIs had the same effects as McKoon and Ratcliff's "predicting inferences. " Unexpectedly, participants gained control over STIs and predicting inferences, so that RT differences (and error differences in Experiment 1) declined over trials. Analyses of reading times in Experiment 3 ruled out several alternative explanations. Results demonstrate that social inferences can occur spontaneously at encoding and suggest that immediate feedback may make control possible.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bassili, J. N. (1993). Procedural efficiency and the spontaneity of trait inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 200-205.
2.
Bassili, J. N. , & Smith, M. C. (1986). On the spontaneity of trait attributions: Converging evidence for the role of cognitive strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 239-246.
3.
Carlston, D. E. , & Skowronski, J. J. (1994). Savings in the relearning of trait information as evidence for spontaneous inference generation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 840-856.
4.
Cohen, J. , & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
D'Agostino, P. R. (1991). Spontaneous trait inferences: Effects of recognition instructions and subliminal priming on recognition performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 70-77.
6.
Forster, K. I. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 465-495.
7.
Garnham, A. (1992). Minimalism versus constructionism: A false dichotomy in theories of inference in reading. PSYCOLOQUY3(63) reading-inference-I.I.
8.
Glenberg, A. M., & Mathew, S. (1992). When minimalism is not enough: Mental models in reading comprehension. PSYCOLO-QUY3(64) reading-inference-2.1.
9.
Graesser, A. C. , & Bower, G. H. (Eds.). (1990). The psychology of learning and motivation: VoL 25. Inferences and text comprehensionSan Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10.
Hamilton, D. (1988). Causal attribution viewed from an information-processing perspective. In D. Bar-Tal & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), The social psychology of knowledge (pp. 359-385). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Keenan, J. M. , Potts, G. R., Golding, J. M., & Jennings, T. M. (1990). Which elaborative inferences are drawn during reading? A question of methodologies. In D. A. Balota, G. B. F. d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 377-402). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Kelley, H. H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morris-town, NJ: General Learning Press.
14.
Lupfer, M. B. , Clark, F., & Hutcherson, H. W. (1990). Impact of context on spontaneous trait and situational attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 239-249.
15.
Mandler, J. M. (1984). Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
McKoon, G. , & Ratcliff, R. (1986). Inferences about predictable events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 82-91.
17.
McKoon, G. , & Ratcliff, R. (1989a). Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inference with recognition: Compatibility checking vs com-pound cue theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 547-563.
18.
McKoon, G. , & Ratcliff, R. (1989b). Semantic associations and elaborative inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 326-338.
19.
McKoon, G. , & Ratcliff, R. (1990). Textual inferences: Models and measures. In D. A. Balota, G. B. F. d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 403-421). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
McKoon, G. , & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440-466.
21.
Moskowitz, G. B. , & Roman, R. J. (1992). Spontaneous trait inferences as self-generated primes: Implications for conscious social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 728-738.
22.
Newman, L. S. (1991). Why are traits inferred spontaneously? A developmental approach. Social Cognition, 9, 221-253.
23.
Newman, L. S. (1993). How individualists interpret behavior: Idiocentrism and spontaneous trait inference. Social Cognition, 11, 243-269.
24.
Newman, L. S. , & Uleman, J. S. (1990). Assimilation and contrast effects in spontaneous trait inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 224-240.
25.
Smith, E. R. (1994). Procedural knowledge and processing strategies in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer,Jr., & R. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Vol. 1. Basic processes (2nd ed., pp. 99-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Srull, T. K. , & Wyer, R. S.,Jr. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.
27.
Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93, 239-257.
28.
Tulving, E. , & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
29.
Uleman, J. S. (1987). Consciousness and control: The case of spontaneous trait inferences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 337-354.
30.
Uleman, J. S. (1989). The self-control of thoughts: A framework for thinking about unintended thought. InJ. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 425-449). New York: Guilford.
31.
Uleman, J. S. , & Moskowitz, G. B. (1994). Unintended effects of goals on unintended inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 490-501.
32.
Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34-52.
33.
Whitney, P. , Waring, D. A., & Zingmark, B. (1992). Task effects on the spontaneous activation of trait concepts. Social Cognition, 10, 377-396.
34.
Whitney, P. , & Williams-Whitney, D. L. (1990). Toward a contextualist view of elaborative inferences. In A. C. Graesser & G. H. Bower (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 25, pp. 279-293). New York: Academic Press.
35.
See correction (1986), Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 355.
36.
See correction (1986), Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 381.
37.
Wyer, R. S., Jr. , & Srull, T. K. (1989). Memory and cognition in its social context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
