This study examined stigmatized individuals' reactions to receiving assumptive help from a nonstigmatized other. Assumptive help was defined as unsolicited help provided without any evidence indicating personal need on the part of the recipient. It was hypothesized that Black students who received assumptive help from a White peer would have lower self esteem and more depressed affect than Black students who did not receive assumptive help. Furthermore, it was predicted that receiving assumptive help from a White peer would have more negative effects (i. e., result in lower self esteem and more depressed affect) among Black recipients than White recipients. No differences in self-esteem and affect were expected between Blacks and Whites who did not receive help. Results based on a measure of competence-based self-esteem were consistent with the hypotheses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Broverman, I. K. , Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current reappraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28(2), 59-78.
2.
Byrne, D. , & Clore, G. L. (1970). A reinforcement model of evaluative responses. Personality: An International Journal1, 103-128.
3.
Cook, S. W. , & Pelfrey, M. (1985). Reactions to being helped in cooperating interracial groups: A context effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1231-1245.
4.
Crocker, J. , & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
5.
Crocker,J. , Voekl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218-228.
6.
DePaulo, B. M. , Brown, P. L., Ishii, S., & Fisher, J. D. (1981). Help that works: The effects of aid on subsequent task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 478-487.
7.
Dovidio,J. F. , & Gaertner, S. M. (1983). Race, normative structure, and help-seeking. In B. M. DePaulo, A. Nadler, &J. Fisher (Eds.), New directions in helping (Vol. 2, pp. 285-302). New York: Academic Press.
Fisher, J. D. , Harrison, G. L., & Nadler, A. (1978). Exploring the generalizability of donor-recipient similarity effectPersonality and Social Psychology BuUetin, 4, 627-630.
10.
Fisher, J. D. , & Nadler,A. (1974). The effect of similarity between donor and recipient on recipient's reactions to aid. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 230-243.
11.
Fisher, J. D. , Nadler, A., & Whitcher-Alagna, S. (1982). Recipient reactions to aid. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 27-54.
12.
Heilman, M. E. (1994). Affirmative action: Some unintended consequences for working women. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 16, pp. 125-169). Greenwich, CT:JAI.
13.
Heilman, M. E. , Lucas, J. A., & Kaplow, S. R. (1990). Self-derogating consequences of sex-based preferential selection: The moderating role of initial self-confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 202-216.
14.
Heilman, M. E. , Rivero,J. C., & Brett, J. (1991). Skirting the competence issue: The effects of sex-based preferential selection on the task choices of women and men. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 99-105.
15.
Heilman, M. E. , Simon, M. C., & Repper, D. P. (1987). Intentionally favored, unintentionally harmed? Impact of sex-based preferential selection on self-perceptions and self-evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 62-68.
16.
Jones, E. E. , Farina,A.,Hastorf,A. H., Markus, H., Miller, D. T., & Scott, R. A. (1984). Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationshipsNew York: W. H. Freeman.
17.
Langer, E. J. , & Benevento, A. (1978). Self-induced dependence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 886-893.
18.
Lenney, E. (1977). Women's self-confidence in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 1-13.
19.
Major, B. (1994). Social inequality to personal entitlement The role of comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 293-355). New York: Academic Press.
20.
Major, B. , & Crocker, J. (1993). Social stigma: The consequences of attributional ambiguity. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 345-370). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
21.
Major, B. , Feinstein, J., & Crocker, J. (1994). The attributional ambiguity of affirmative action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 113-141.
22.
Nadler, A. , Altman, A., & Fisher, J. D. (1979). Helping is not enough: Recipient's reactions to aid as a function of positive and negative information about the self. Journal of Personality, 47, 615-628.
23.
Nadler, A. , & Fisher,J. D. (1986). The role of threat to self-esteem and perceived control in recipient reaction to help: Theory development and empirical validation. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 81-121). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
24.
Nadler, A. , Fisher,J. D., & Itzhak, S. B. (1983). With a little help from myfriend: Effect of single or multiple act aid as a function of donor and task characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 310-321.
25.
Nadler, A. , Fisher,J. D., & Streufert, S. (1976). When helping hurts: effects of donor-recipient similarity and recipient self-esteem on reactions to aid. Journal of Personality, 44, 392-409.
26.
Roberts, T. (1991). Gender and the influence of evaluations on self-assessments in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 297-308.
27.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Steele, C. (1992, April). Race and the schooling of Black Americans. Atlantic Monthly, pp. 68-78.
29.
Steele, C. , & Aronson, J. (1994). Contending with a stereotype: African-American intellectual test performance and stereotype vulnerability. Manuscript submitted for publication.
30.
Testa, M. , & Major, B. (1990). The impact of social comparison after failure: The moderating effects of perceived control. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 205-218.
31.
Zuckerman, M. , & Lubin, B. (1965). Manual for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List. San Diego, CA: Educational & Industrial Testing Service.
