An experiment was conducted to assess whether the effects of inadmissible information in a simulated criminal trial is moderated by race. The significant interaction between information admissibility and defendant's race indicated that the effect of inadmissible information was stronger when the defendant was Black. More specifically, perceptions of the appropriate verdict did not vary as a function of race in the admissible or control condition. On the other hand, in the inadmissible condition, perceptions of the appropriate verdict were higher for the Black defendant than for the White defendant. Interestingly, subjects in the Black-defendant-inadmissible condition felt that they were less affected by the inadmissible information than subjects in the White-defendant-inadmissible condition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Banaji, M. R. , Hardin C. S., & Rothman, D. (1993). Implicit stereotyping in person judgmentJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 272-281.
2.
Bargh, J. A. (1984). Automatic and conscious processing of social information. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), The handbook of social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 1-43). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Faranda, J. , & Gaertner, S. (1979). The effects of inadmissible evidence introduced by the prosecution and the defense, and the defendant's race on the verdicts in high and low authoritarians. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York.
4.
Frey, D. I. , & Gaertner, S. L. (1986). Helping and the avoidance of inappropriate interracial behavior: A strategy that perpetuates a nonprejudice self-image. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1083-1090.
5.
Gaertner, S. L. , & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism: Theory and research (pp. 61-89). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
6.
Gray, D. B. , & Ashmore, R. D. (1976). Biasing influence on defendants' characteristics on simulated sentencing. Psychological Reports, 38, 727-738.
7.
Greenwald, A. G. , & Banaji, M. R. (1993). A theory of implicit social cognition: Stereotypes, self; and prejudice. Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington, Seattle.
8.
Horowitz, I. A. (1988). The impact of judicial instructions, arguments, and challenges on jury decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 439-453.
9.
Hutchinson, E. (1990). The mugging of Black America. Chicago: African American Images.
10.
Johnson, J. , Jackson, L. A., & Smith, G. (1989). The role of ambiguity and gender in mediating the effects of salient conditions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 52-60.
11.
Johnson, J. , & Russ, I. (1989). Effects of salience of consciousness-raising information on the perception of acquaintance versus stranger rape. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 182-197.
12.
Johnson, S. L. (1985). Black innocence and the White jury. Michigan Law Review, 83, 1611-1708.
13.
Kadish, M. R. , & Kadish. S. H. (1971). The institutionalization of conflict: Jury acquittals. Journal of Social Issues. 27(2), 199-217.
14.
Klein, K. , & Creech, B. (1982). Race, rape and bias: Distortion of prior odds and meaning changes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 21-33.
15.
MacCoun, R. , & Kerr, N. (1988). Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors bias for leniency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 21-33.
16.
McConohay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91-125). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
17.
McGlynn, R. P. , Megas, J. C., & Benson, D. H. (1976). Sex and race as factors affecting the attribution of insanity in a murder trial. Journal of Psychology, 93, 93-99.
18.
Nickerson, S. , Mayo, C., & Smith, A. (1986). Racism in the courtroom. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 255-275). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
19.
Nisbett, R. E. , & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
20.
Rogers, R. W. , & Prentice-Dunn, S. (1981). Deindividuation and anger-mediated interracial aggression: Unmasking regressive racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 63-73.
21.
Schafer, D. , & Kerwin, J. (1992). On adhering to judicial instructions: Reactions of dogmatic and nondogmatic juries to the judge's charge in an entrapment case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1133-1147.
22.
Schul, Y. , & Burnstein, E. (1985). When discounting fails: Conditions under which individuals use discredited information in making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 894-903.
23.
Srull, T. K. , & Wyer, R. S. (1980). Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 841-856.
24.
Sue, S. , Smith R., & Caldwell, C. (1973). Effects of inadmissable evidence on the decisions of simulated jurors: A moral dilemma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 345-353.
25.
Thompson, W. , Fong, G., & Rosenhan, D. (1981). Inadmissible evidence and juror verdicts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 453-463.
26.
Ugweugbu, D. C. (1979). Racial and evidential factors in juror attribution of legal responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 133-146.
27.
Weiten, W. , & Diamond, S. C. (1979). A critical review of the jury simulation paradigm: The case of defendant characteristics. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 71-93.
28.
Wyer, R. S. , & Budesheim, T. (1987). Person memory and judgments: The impact of information that one is told to disregard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 14-29.
29.
Wyer, R. S. , & Unverzagt, W. H. (1985). The effects of instructions to disregard information on its subsequent recall and use in making judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 533-549.
