Time Frames for Mood: Relations between Momentary and Generalized Ratings of Affect

Abstract

A computerized diary method was used to investigate relations between momentary and generalized affect reports. Thirty participants rated current mood at 2-hourly intervals and gave retrospective reports of daily and weekly mood for a 2-week period. Average momentary ratings provided a closer estimate of daily mood than either peak or most recent momentary ratings. Similarly, average daily mood indexes tended to give the best estimates of weekly mood. However, for positive (but not negative) mood, daily reports were consistently higher than average momentary ratings, and weekly reports were consistently higher than average daily ratings. Regression analyses suggested that daily ratings were influenced mainly by average momentary mood but that independent effects of peak and most recent momentary mood were detectable too. Retrospective reports of daily mood were also influenced by current mood. In general, however, memory for affect was rather better than previous research has implied.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Batson, C. D. , Shaw, L. L. , & Oleson, K. C. (1992). Differentiating affect, mood, and emotion: Toward functionally based conceptual distinctions. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 294-326.

Blaney, P. H. (1986). Affect and memory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 229-246.

Bolger, N. , DeLongis, A. , Kessler, R. C. , & Schilling, E. A. (1989). Effects of daily stress on negative mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 808-818.

Craik, F. I. M. , & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A frame-work for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.

DeLongis, A. , Hemphill, K. J. , & Lehman, D. R. (1992). A structured diary methodology for the study of daily events. In F. B. Bryant , J. Edwards , R. S. Tindale , E. J. Posavac , L. Heath , E. Henderson , & Y. Suarez-Balcazar (Eds.), Methodological issues in applied social psychology (pp. 83-109). New York: Plenum.

Hedges, S. M. , Jandorf, L. , & Stone, A. A. (1985). Meaning of daily mood measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 428-434.

Isen, A. M. (1984). Toward understanding the role of affect in cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 179-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Larsen, R. J. , & Kasimatis, M. (1990). Individual differences in entrainment of mood to the weekly calendar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 164-171.

Nasby, W. , & Yando, R. (1982). Selective encoding and retrieval of affectively valent information: Two cognitive consequences of children's mood states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1244-1253.

10.

Nowlis, V. (1965). Research with the Mood Adjective Checklist. In S. S. Tomkins & C. E. Izard (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and personality (pp. 352-389). New York: Springer.

11.

Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-1178.

12.

Schrader, G. , Davis, A. , Stefanovic, S. , & Christie, P. (1990). The recollection of affect. Psychological Medicine, 20, 105-109.

13.

Taylor, S. E. , & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.

14.

Thayer, R. E. (1989). The biopsychology of mood and arousal. New York: Oxford University Press.

15.

Thomas, D. L. , & Diener, E. (1990). Memory accuracy in the recall of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 291-297.

16.

Totterdell, P. , & Folkard, S. (1992). In situ repeated measures of affect and cognitive performance facilitated by use of a hand-held computer. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 24, 545-553.

17.

Watson, D. , & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235.

18.

Weary, G. , & Arkin, R. M. (1981). Attributional self-presentation. In J. H. Harvey , W. J. Ickes , & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 3, pp. 223-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

19.

Wheeler, L. , & Reis, H. T. (1991). Self-recording of everyday life events: Origins, types, and uses. Journal of Personality, 59, 341-354.