Defensive distancing from victims of serious illness was investigated by providing subjects with personality profiles of a target person who had either a serious life-threatening illness (stomach cancer) or a less serious health problem (sprained ankle). Either immediately after learning of the target person's illness or after a 3-min delay, subjects rated themselves on the same set of personality traits. A significant Illness x Delay interaction was found on a composite measure of distancing from the victim. Subjects distanced themselves from the cancer victim by rating their own personalities as discrepant from this person in the delay but not in the immediate condition. Immediate but not delay subjects indicated greater liking for the cancer victim than the sprained ankle victim. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrams, D., Simpson, A., & Hogg, M. A. (1987). Different views: The impact of sex, area of residence, and victimization on teenagers' explanations for delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 401-413.
2.
Alicke, M. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621-1630.
3.
Artiss, K. L., & Levine, A. S. (1973). Doctor-patient relation in severe illness. New England Journal of Medicine, 288, 1210-1214.
4.
Byrne, D., & Blaylock, B. (1963). Similarity and assumed similarity of attitudes between husbands and wives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 636-640.
5.
Croyle, R. T. (in press). Biased appraisal of high blood pressure. Preventive Medicine.
6.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
7.
Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., Lando, H. A., & McGovern, P. G. (1991). Smoking cessation and social comparison: The role of the "typical smoker."Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 239-258.
8.
Gilovich, T. (1981). Seeing the past in -the present: The effect of associations to familiar events on judgements and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 797-808.
9.
Granberg, D., & King, M. (1980). Cross-lagged panel analysis of the relation between attraction and perceived similarity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 573-581.
10.
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Pinel, E., Simon, L., & Jordan, K. (1993). Effects of self-esteem on vulnerability-denying defensive distortions: Further evidence of an anxiety-buffering function. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 229-251.
11.
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Simon, L., & Brues, M. (1994). Exploring the nature of terror management effects: On the specificity to mortality and the role of consciousness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 627-637.
12.
Jemmott, J. B., Ditto, P. H., & Croyle, R. T. (1986).Judging health status: Effects of perceived prevalence and personal relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 899-905.
13.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgement of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
14.
Kastenbaum, R., & Aisenberg, R. (1972). The psychology of death. New York: Springer-Verlag.
15.
Katz, I. (1981). Stigma: A social psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Kelley, J. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
17.
Kleck, R. E. (1968). Physical cues and nonverbal cues emitted in face-to-face interaction. Human Relations, 21, 19-28.
18.
Kleck, R. E., Ono, H., & Hastorf, A. H. (1966). The effects of physical deviance upon face-to-face interaction. Human Relations, 19, 425-436.
19.
Knopf, A. (1976). Changes in women's opinions about cancer. Social Science and Medicine, 10, 191-195.
20.
Kunda, Z. (1987). Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 636-647.
21.
Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1982). Target attractiveness as a mediator of assumed attitude similarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 728-735.
22.
Marks, G., Miller, N., & Maruyama, G. (1981). Effects of targets' physical attractiveness on assumptions of similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 198-206.
23.
Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (1987). Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on inferential bias: A biased hypothesis-testing model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 297-340). New York: Academic Press.
24.
Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Sideris, J., & Stubing, M. J. (1993). Emotional expression and the reduction of motivated cognitive bias: Evidence from cognitive dissonance and distancing from victims paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 177-186.
25.
Quattrone, G. A., & Tversky, A. (1984). Causal versus diagnostic contingencies: On self-deception and on the voter's illusion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 237-248.
26.
Schulz, R. (1978). The psychology of death, dying, and bereavement. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27.
Snyder, M. L., Kleck, R. E., Strenta, A., & Mentzer, S. J. (1979). Avoidance of the handicapped: An attributional ambiguity analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2297-2306.
28.
Stahly, G. B. (1988). Psychosocial aspects of the stigma of cancer: An overview. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 6(34), 3-27.
29.
Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181-227). New York: Academic Press.
30.
Thornton, B. (1984). Defensive attribution of responsibility: Evidence for an arousal-based motivational bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 721-734.
31.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
32.
Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparison of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 231-248.
33.
Wortman, C. B., & Dunkel-Schetter, C. (1979). Interpersonal relationships and cancer: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 35, 120-155.
