The relationship between the self and the collective is discussed from the perspective of self-categorization theory. Self-categorization theory makes a basic distinction between personal and social identity as different levels of self-categorization. It shows how the emergent properties of group processes can be explained in terms of a shift in self perception from personal to social identity. It also elucidates how self-categorization varies with the social context. It argues that self-categorizing is inherently variable, fluid, and context dependent, as sedf-categories are social comparative and are always relative to a frame of reference. This notion has major implications for accepted ways of thinking about the self: The variability of self-categorizing provides the perceiver with behavioral and cognitive flexibility and ensures that cognition is always shaped by the social context in which it takes place.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barsalou, L. W. (1987). The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
David, B. , & Turner, J. C. (1992, July). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion. Paper presented in Symposium on Minority Influence at the Joint Meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology/Society of Experimental Social Psychology, Leuven/Louvain-la Neuve, Belgium.
3.
Gaertner, S. L. , Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249.
4.
Gergen, K. J. (1977). The social construction of self-knowledge. In T. Mischel (Ed.), The self: Psychological and philosophical issues. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
5.
Gurin, P. , & Markus, H. (1988). Group identity: The psychological mechanisms of durable salience. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 1, 257-274.
6.
Haslam, S. A. , Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & McGarty, C. (in press). Social categorization and group homogeneity: Changes in the perceived applicability of stereotype content as a function of comparative context and trait favorableness. British Journal of Social Psychology.
7.
Haslam, S. A. , & Turner, J. C. (1992). Context-dependent variation in social stereotyping 2: The relationship between frame of reference, self-categorization and accentuation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 251-277.
8.
Haslam, S. A. , & Turner, J. C. (in press). Context-dependent variation in social stereotyping 3: Extremism as a self-categorical basis for polarized judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology.
9.
Haslam, S. A. , Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., & Hayes, B. K. (1992). Context-dependent variation in social stereotyping 1: The effects of intergroup relations as mediated by social change and frame of reference. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 3-20.
10.
Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
11.
Hogg, M. A. , & Turner, J. C. (1987). Intergroup behavior, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325-340.
12.
Hogg, M. A. , Turner, J. C., & Davidson, B. (1990). Polarized norms and social frames of reference: A test of the self-categorization theory of group polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 77-100.
13.
Markus, H. , & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337.
14.
McGarty, C. , & Turner, J. C. (1992). The effects of categorization on social judgment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 147-157.
15.
McGarty, C. , Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., David, B., & Wetherell, M. S. (1992). Group polarization as conformity to the prototypical group member. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 1-20.
16.
Murphy, G. L. , & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316.
17.
Neisser, E. (Ed.). (1987). Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Oakes, P. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.
19.
Oakes, P. J. , Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
20.
Oakes, P. J. , Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (1991). Perceiving people as group members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 125-144.
21.
Sherif, M. , & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
Simon, B. (1992). The perception of ingroup and outgroup homogeneity: Re-introducing the social context. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 3). Chichester, England: Wiley.
23.
Stryker, S. , & Statham, A. (1985). Symbolic interaction and role theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1). New York: Random House.
24.
Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79-97.
25.
Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Buckingham, England: Open University Press; Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
26.
Turner, J. C. , Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.
27.
Turner, J. C. , & Oakes, P. J. (1989). Self-categorization theory and social influence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 233-275). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Wilder, D. A. , & Thompson, J. E. (1988). Assimilation and contrast effects in the judgments of groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 62-73.
