Two studies investigated the effects of image and issue information on evaluations of political candidates. The extent to which voters base their evaluations on stereotypic image information (i.e., candidates' physical attractiveness) and nonstereotypic image information (i.e., individuating personality descriptions of the candidates) was examined. Also of interest were the factors that lead to image-based, as opposed to issue-based, evaluations of the candidates. Results demonstrated that (a) physical appearance influenced evaluations even when individuating personality information was provided, (b) subjects' evaluations were less influenced by their agreement with the candidates' issue positions when image information was presented than when it was not, and (c) subjects' evaluations were less influenced by issue agreement when a candidate's image was evaluatively mixed than when it was evaluatively consistent.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramowitz, A. I. (1978). The impact of presidential debate on voter rationality. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 680-690.
2.
Birnbaum, M. H. (1974). The nonadditivity of personality impressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 543-561.
3.
Campbell, A. , Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.
4.
Conover, P. J. , & Feldman, S. (1982). Projection and the perception of candidates' issue positions. Western Political Quarterly, 35, 228-244.
5.
Deaux, K. , & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991-1004.
6.
Dion, K. K. , Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. H. (1972). What is beautiful isgood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290.
7.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
8.
Eagly, A. H. , Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but...: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109-128.
9.
Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889-906.
10.
Futoran, G. C. , & Wyer, R. S. (1986). The effects of traits and gender-stereotypes on occupational suitability judgments and the recall of judgment-relevantinformation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 475-503.
11.
Granberg, D. , & Brent, E. (1980). Perceptions of issue positions of presidential candidates. American Scientist, 68, 617-625.
12.
Guilford, J. P. , & Fruchter, B. (1978). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
Hong, S. T. , & Wyer, R. S. (1989). Effects of country-of-origin and product-attribute information on product evaluation: An information processing perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 175-187.
14.
Kanouse, D. E. , & Hanson, L. R. (1972). Negativity in evaluations. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
15.
Kelly, S., Jr. , & Mirer, T. (1974). The simple act of voting. American Political Science Review, 68, 572-591.
16.
Krosnick, J. A. (1988). The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: A study of policy preference, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 196-210.
17.
Krosnick, J. A. (1990). Americans' perceptions of presidential candidates: A test of the projection hypothesis. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 159-182.
18.
Lau, R. R. (1982). Negativity in political perception. Political Behavior, 4, 353-378.
19.
Lau, R. R. (1985). Two explanations for negativity effects in political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 119-138.
20.
Locksley, A. , Borgida, E., Brekke, N., & Hepburn, C. (1980). Sex stereotypes and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 821-831.
21.
Lodge, M. , McGraw, K., & Stroh, P. (1989) . An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 83, 399-419.
22.
Luchins, A. S. (1957). Primacy-recency in impression formation. In C. I. Hovland (Ed.), The order of presentation in persuasion (pp. 33-61). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
Markus, G. B. , & Converse, P. E. (1979). A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. American Political Science Review, 73, 1055-1070.
24.
McGraw, K. M. , Pinney, N., & Neumann, D. (1991). Memory for political actors: Contrasting the use of semantic and evaluative organizational strategies. Political Behavior, 13, 165-189.
25.
Miller, A. , Wattenberg, M., & Malanchuk, O. (1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates. American Political Science Review, 80, 521-540.
26.
Ottati, V. C. (1990). Determinants of political judgments: The joint influence of native and heuristic rules of inference. Political Behavior, I2, 159-179.
27.
Ottati, V. C. , Fishbein, M., & Middlestadt, S. E. (1988). Determinants of voters' beliefs about the candidates' stands on the issues: The role of evaluative bias heuristics and the candidates' expressed message. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 517-529.
28.
Riggle, E. D. , Ottati, V. C., Wyer, R. S., Kuklinski, J., & Schwarz, N. (1992). Bases of political judgments: The role of stereotypic and nonstereotypic information. Political Behavior, 14, 67-87.
29.
Rosenberg, S. W. , Bohan, L., McCafferty, P., & Harris, K. (1986). The image and the vote: The effect of candidate presentation on voter preference. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 108-127.
30.
Rosenberg, S. W. , Kahn, S., & Tran, T. (1991). Creating a political image: Shaping appearance and manipulating the vote. Political Behavior, 13, 345-367.
31.
Rosenberg, S. W. , & McCafferty, P. (1987). The image and the vote: Manipulating voters' preferences. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 31-47.
32.
Shaffer, S. D. (1981). Balance theory and political cognitions. American Politics Quarterly, 9, 291-320.
33.
Srull, T. K. , & Wyer, R. S. (1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96, 58-83.
34.
Wyer, R. S. , Budesheim, T. L., Shavitt, S., Riggle, E. D., Melton, R. J., & Kuklinski, j. H. (1991). Image, issues, and ideology: The processing of information about political candidates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 533-545.
