Explanations for performance and behavior are often biased by stereotypes held by social perceivers. Stereotypes may affect not only judgments of the causal role of members of the stereotyped group but also assessments of the causal influence of people and events that are unrelated to the stereotype. The findings from three experiments indicate that an important mechanism through which stereotypes affect judgments of the causality of stereotype-irrelevant factors is blocking as described by Kamin. Patterns of causality consistent with gender stereotypes blocked, or attenuated, the perception of covariation between causes unrelated to gender and performance outcomes. The blocking of this covariation evidence, in turn, decreased the causality attributed to gender-irrelevant events. The findings suggest that blocking is a distinct process from discounting through which stereotypes and other expectancies bias causal attributions and persevere.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, L. Y. , Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 102-109.
2.
Alloy, L. B. , & Tabachnik, N. (1984). Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: The joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information. Psychological Review, 91, 112-149.
3.
Bodenhausen, G. V. , & Wyer, R. S. (1985). Effects of stereotypes on decision making and information-processing strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 267-282.
4.
Chapman, G. B. , & Robbins, S. J. (1990). Cue interaction in human contingency judgment. Memory and Cognition, 18, 537-545.
5.
Chapman, L. J. , & Chapman, J. P. (1967). Genesis of popular but erroneous psycho-diagnostic observations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 72, 193-204.
6.
Chapman, L. J. , & Chapman, J. P. (1969). Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 271-280.
7.
Crocker, J. (1981). Judgment of covariation by social perceivers. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 272-292.
8.
Deaux, K. , & Emswiller, T. (1974). Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 80-85.
9.
Dickinson, A. , & Shanks, D. (1985). Animal conditioning and human causality judgment. In L. G. Nilsson & T. Archer (Eds.), Perspectives on learning and memory (pp. 167-191). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Fazio, R. H. , Sherman, S. J., & Herr, P. M. (1982). The feature-positive effect in the self-perception process: Does not doing matter as much as doing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 404-411.
11.
Feather, N. T. , & Simon, J. G. (1975). Reactions to male and female success and failure in sex-linked occupations: Impressions of personality, causal attributions, and perceived likelihood of different consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229-238.
12.
Fiske, S. T. , & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
Hamilton, D. L. , & Rose, T. L. (1980). Illusory correlation and the maintenance of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 832-845.
14.
Hansen, R. D. (1980). Commonsense attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 996-1009.
15.
Higgins, E. T. , & Bargh, J. A. (1987). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 369-425.
16.
Hiroto, D. S. (1974). Locus of control and learned helplessness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 187-193.
17.
Jennings, D. , Amabile, T. M., & Ross, L. (1982). Informal covariation assessment: Data-based vs. theory-based judgments. In A. Tversky, D. Kahneman, & P. Slovic (Eds.),Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 211-230). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Kamin, L. J. (1968). "Attention-like"processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami Symposium on the Prediction of Behavior 1967: Aversive behavior (pp. 9-31). Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.
19.
Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279-296). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
20.
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
21.
Kelley, H. H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 151-174). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
22.
McArthur, L. Z. (1981). What grabs you? The role of attention in impression formation and causal attribution. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 201-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
24.
Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes (G. V. Anrep, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
25.
Rescorla, R. A. , & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
26.
Schneider, D. J. (1991). Social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 527-561.
27.
Shaklee, H. , & Fischhoff, B. (1982). Strategies of information search in causal analysis. Memory and Cognition, 10, 520-530.
28.
Shanks, D. R. (1991). On similarities between causal judgments in experienced and described situations. Psychological Science2, 341-350.
29.
Sherman, S. J. , Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1989). Social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 281-326.
30.
Simon, H. A. (1959). Theories of decision making in economics and behavioral science. American Economic Review, 49, 253-283.
31.
Srull, T. K. , & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1986). The role of chronic and temporary goals in social information processing. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbok of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 503-549). New York: Guilford.
32.
Taylor, S. E. , & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. InE. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 89-134).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
Taylor, S. E. , & Fiske, S. T. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11). New York: Academic Press.
34.
Taynor, J. , & Deaux, K. (1973). When women are more deserving than men: Equity, attribution, and perceived sex difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 360-367.
35.
Trabasso, T. , & Bower, G. H. (1968). Attention in learning: Theory and research. New York: John Wiley.
36.
Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.
37.
Weiner, B. , Frieze, I., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S., & Rosenbaum, R. (1971). Perceiving the causes of success and failure. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
38.
Yee, D. K. , & Eccles, J. S. (1988). Parent perceptions and attributions for children's math achievement. Sex Roles, 19, 317-333.
