This study tested an integrative model of how dimensions of contact (quantitative, qualitative, and intergroup) are related to intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out group attitude. Data were collected in a field study of minority (Hindu) and majority (Muslim) religious groups in Bangladesh. Path analysis revealed that dimensions of contact were significant predictors of all three criterion variables, although different dimensions emerged as predictors in each case, and there were some interactions with subjects' religious group. AU three dimensions of contact were associated with intergroup anxiety, but whereas quantitative contact had a significant impact on perceived out-group variability, qualitative contact was associated with out-group attitude. The model highlights the central role of intergroup anxiety as associated with dimensions of contact and as a predictor of perceived out-group variability and out-group attitude.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allport, G. W. (1979). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. (Original work published 1954)
2.
Amir, Y. (1969). Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 319-342.
3.
Bodenhausen, G. V. (1993). Emotions, arousal, and stereotypic judgments: A heuristic model of affect and stereotyping. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect cognition and stereotyping Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 13-37). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4.
Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Brewer, M. B. , & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281-302). New York: Academic Press.
6.
Cook, S. W. (1984). Cooperative interaction in multiethnic contexts. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 156-186). New York: Academic Press.
7.
Crocker, J. , Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Schematic bases of belief change. In J. R. Eiser (Ed.), Attitudinal judgment (pp. 197-226). New York: Springer-Verlag.
8.
Dijker, A. J. (1987). Emotional reactions to ethnic minorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 305-325.
9.
Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183-201.
10.
Everitt, B. S. , & Dunn, G. (1991). Applied multivariate data analysis. London: Edward Arnold.
11.
Hewstone, M. , & Brown, R. J. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the 'contact hypothesis." In M. Hewstone & R. J. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1-44). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
12.
Horwitz, M. , & Rabbie, J. M. (1989). Stereotypes of groups, group members, and individuals in categories: A differential analysis. In D. Bar-Tal, C-F. Graumann, A. W. Kruglanski, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice: Changing conceptions (pp. 105-129). New York: Springer-Verlag.
13.
Huberty, C. J. , & Morris, J. D. (1989). Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. Psychological Bulklin, 105, 302-308.
14.
Johnston, L. , & Hewstone, M. (1992). Cognitive models of stereotype change: (3) Subtyping and the perceived typicality of disconfirming group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 360-386.
15.
Jones, E. E. , Wood, G. C., & Quattrone, G. A. (1981). Perceived variability of personal characteristics in in-groups and out-groups: The role of knowledge and evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 523-528.
16.
Judd, C. M. , & Park, B. (1988). Outgroup homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 778-788.
17.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Ateion and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18.
Unville, P. W. , Fischer, G. W., & Salovey, P. (1989). Perceived distributions of characteristics of ingroup and outgroup members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165-188.
19.
Linville, P. W. , Salovey, P., & Fischer, G. W. (1986). Stereotyping and perceived distributions of social characteristics: An application to ingroup-outgroup perception. In J. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discinination and racism (pp. 165-208). New York: Academic Press.
20.
Mackie, D. M. , Hamilton, D. L., Schroth, H. A., Carlisle, C. J., Gersho, B. F., Meneses, L. M., Nedler, B. F., & Reichel, L. D. (1989). The effects of induced mood on expectancy-based illusory correlations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 524-544.
21.
Maniruzaman, T. (1982). The future of Bangladesh. In A. J. Wilson & D. Dalton (Eds.), The states of South Asia: Problems of national integration (pp. 265-294). London: Hurst.
22.
Miller, N. , Brewer, M. B., & Edwards, K. (1985). Cooperative interaction in desegregated settings: a laboratory analogue. Journal of Social Issue, 41, 63-79.
23.
Mukherjee, R. (1973). The social background of Bangladesh. In K. Gough & H. P. Sharma (Eds.), Imperialism and revolution in South Asia (pp. 399-418). New York: Monthly Review Press.
24.
Mullen, B. , Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
25.
O'Connell, J. T. (1976). Dilemmas of secularism in Bangladesh. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 11, 64-81.
26.
Park, B. , & Judd, C. M. (1990). Measures and models of perceived group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 173-191.
27.
Park, B. , Judd, C. M., & Ryan, C. S. (1991). Social categorization and the representation of variability information. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 211-245). Chichester, England: John Wiley.
28.
Park, B. , & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Physiology, 42, 1051-1068.
29.
Park, B. , Ryan, C. S., & Judd, C. M. (1992). The role of meaningful subgroups in explaining differences in perceived variability for in-groups and out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 553-567.
30.
Quattrone, G. A. (1986). On the perception of a group's variability. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 25-48). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
31.
Quattrone, G. A. , & Jones, E. E. (1980). The perception of variability within in-groups and out-groups: Implications for the law of small numbers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 141-152.
32.
Rothbart, M. , & John, O. P. (1985). Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 81-104.
33.
Rothbart, M. , & Lewis, S. (1988). Inferring category attributes from exemplar attributes: Geometric shapes and social categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 861-872.
34.
Simon, B. , & Brown, R. (1987). Perceived intergroup homogeneity in minority-majority contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology53, 703-711.
35.
Stephan, W. G. , & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxuety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157-175.
36.
Stroessner, S. J. , Hamilton, D. L., & Mackie, D. M. (1992). Affect and stereotyping: The effect of induced mood on distinctiveness-based iliusory correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 564-576.
37.
Stroessner, S. J. , & Mackie, D. M. (1992). The impact of induced affect on the perceptions of variability in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 546-554.
38.
Stroessner, S. J. , & Mackie, D. M. (1993). Affect and perceived group variability: Implications for stereotyping and prejudice. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect cognition and stereotyping Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 63-86). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39.
Weber, R. , & Crocker, J. (1983). Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 961-977.
40.
Wilder, D. A. (1984). Intergroup contact: The typical member and the exception to the rule. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 177-194.
41.
Wilder, D. A. (1986). Cognitive factors affecting the success of intergroup contact. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 49-66). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
42.
Wilder, D. A. (1993). The role of anxiety in facilitating stereotypic judgments of out-group behavior. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect cognition and stereotyping Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 87-109). San Diego, CA. Academic Press.
43.
Wilder, D. A. , & Shapiro, P. N. (1989). Role of competition-induced anxiety in limiting the beneficial impact of positive behavior by an out-group member. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 60-69.
