A model is presented of how people construct coherent representations of others. It integrates work on knowledge representations with Kintsch's construction-integration model of discourse comprehension and Thagard's model of explanatory coherence. A major claim is that parallel constraint satisfaction processes, fundamental to connectionist modeling, play a major role in the development of coherent representations. Several topics are examined: (a) the role of making goal inferences in trait inferences, (b) how people combine apparently inconsistent traits to arrive at a coherent impression, and (c) how this parallel process model can account for findings that have been given a serial interpretation in Trope's two-stage model of dispositional inference and Gilbert's work on cognitive busyness. It is argued that this model provides a more parsimonious but broader explanation for attributions than alternatives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.
2.
Asch, S. E. , & Zukier, H. (1984). Thinking about persons. Journal of Personably and Social Psychology, 46, 1230-1240.
3.
Bar-On, E. (1991). Local -coherent views: Towards a unifying theory of mental capacity and local coherence Draft, October 1991, Department of Science Education, Technion, Israel.
4.
Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wlyer, Jr. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition. Vol 1. A dual process model of impression formation (pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Cheng, P. W. , & Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, 365-382.
6.
Cohen, B. , & Murphy, G. L. (1984). Models of concepts. Cognitive Science, 8, 27-58.
7.
Collins, A. M. , & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
8.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance-Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
9.
Fiske, S. T. , & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic Press.
10.
Gabrys, G. (1989). HEIDER A simulation of attitude consistency and attitude change. In S. Ohlsson (Ed.), Aspects of cognitive conflict and cognitive change (Tech. Rep. No. KUL-89-04). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.
11.
Galambos, J. A. , Abelson, R. P., & Black J. B. (1986). Knowledge structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Gilbert, D. T. (1989). Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 189-211). New York: Guilford.
13.
Gilbert, D. T. , Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733-740.
14.
Hastie, R. , Schroeder, C., & Weber, R. (1990). Creating complex social conjunction categories from simple categories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 242-247.
15.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
16.
Hilton, D. J. , & Slugoski, B. R. (1986). Knowledge-based causal attribution: The abnormal conditions focus model. Psychological Review, 93, 75-88.
17.
John, O. P. (1986). How shall a trait be called: A feature analysis of altruism. In A. Angleitner, A. Furnham, & G. Van Heck (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe: Current Wends and controversies (pp. 117-140). Berwyn: Swets North America.
18.
Jones, E. E. (1988). Impression formation: What do people think about) In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition: Vol 1. A dual process model of impression formation (pp. 83-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: W. H. Freeman.
20.
Jones, E. E. , & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-267). New York: Academic Press.
21.
Kelley, H. H. (1971). Attribution in social interaction. In E. E. Jones, D. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 1-26). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
22.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist28, 103-128.
23.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
24.
Kunda, Z. , Miller, D. T., & Claire, T. (1990). Combining social concepts: The role of causal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 14, 551-577.
25.
LalIjee, M. , & Abelson, R. P. (1983). The organization of explanations. In M. Hewstone (Ed.), Attribution theory: Social and functional extensions (pp. 65-80). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
26.
Miller, L. G. , Bettencourt, B. A., DeBro, S. C., & Hoffman, V. (1993). Negotiating safer sex: A dynamic interpersonal process. In J. Pryor & G. Reeder (Eds.), The social psychology of HlV infection. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Miller, L. C. , & Read, S. J. (1987). Why am I telling you this? Self-disclosure in a goal-based model of personality. In V. J. Derlega & J. Berg (Eds.), Self-disclosure Theory, research and therapy (pp. 35-58). New York: Plenum.
28.
Miller, L. C. , & Read, S. J. (1991). On the coherence of mental models of persons and relationships: A knowledge structure approach. In G. J. O. Fletcher & F. Fincham (Eds.), Cognition in close relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Pennington, N. , & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242-258.
30.
Pennington, N. , & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189-206.
31.
Quattrone, G. A. (1982). Over attribution and unit formation: When behavior engulfs the person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4Z, 593-607.
32.
Ranney, M. (in press). Explorations in explanatory coherence. In E. Bar-On, B. Eylon, & Z. Schertz (Eds.), Designing intelligent learning environments: From cognitive analysis to computer implantation. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
33.
Read, S. J. (1987). Constructing causal scenarios: A knowledge structure approach to causal reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 288-302.
34.
Read, S. J. (1992). Constructing accounts: The role of explanatory coherence. In M. L. McLaughlin, M. J. Cody, & S. J. Read (Eds.), Explaining one's self to others: Reason giving in a social context (pp. 3-19). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Read, S. J. , & Cesa, I. L. (1991). This reminds me of the time when...: Reminding in explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 1-25.
36.
Read, S. J. , Jones, D. K., & Miller, L. C. (1990). Traits as goal-based categories: The importance of goals in the coherence of dispositional categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1048-1061.
37.
Read, S. J. , & Marcus-Newhall, A. (in press). Explanatory coherence in social explanations: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
38.
Read, S. J. , & Miller, L C. (1989). Inter-personalism: Toward a goal-based theory of persons in relationships. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 413-472). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
Read, S. J. , & Miller, L. C. (in press). Dissonance and balance in belief systems: The promise of parallel constraint satisfaction processes and connectionist modeling approaches. In R. C. Schank & E. J. Langer (Eds.), Beliefs, reasoning and decision mating: Psycho-logic in honor of Bob Abelson. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
Rumelhart, D. E. , & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol 1. Foundations. Cambridge, MA.MIT Press/Bradford Books.
41.
Schank, P. K. , & Ranney, M. (1991). An empirical investigation of the psychological fidelity of ECHO: Modeling an experimental study of explanatory coherence. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 892-897). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum.
42.
Schank, R. C. , & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Shultz, T. R. , & Lepper, M. R. (1992). A constraint satisfaction model of cognitive dissonance phenomena. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 462-467). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
Spellman, B. A. , & Holyoak, K. J. (1992). If Saddam is Hider then who is George Bush? Analogical mapping between systems of social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 913-933.
45.
Spellman, B. A. , Ullman, J. B., & Holyoak, K. J. (in press). Shifting views of the Persian Gulf war: Cognitive consistency and attitude change. Journal of Social Issues.
46.
Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 435-467.
47.
Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93, 239-257.
49.
Wilensky, R. (1983). Planning and understanding A computational approach to human reasoning. Reading, MA.Addison-Wesley.
50.
Wright, J. C. , & Mischel, W. (1988). Conditional hedges and the intuitive psychology of traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 454-469.
