Residents of a small rural community were surveyed to examine the relationship between the false consensus bias and recommendations for resolving conflicts about two locally relevant environmental issues concerning regulation of land use in the community. Both the level of consensus that respondents perceived for their views and the extent to which they overestimated consensus were correlated with their recommendations for resolving conflicts about the issues. Respondents who overestimated consensus and/or who perceived higher levels of consensus for their views were more likely to endorse majority rule to resolve conflicts, were less likely to endorse compromise, and were more likely to say their own views should prevail. These findings suggest that false consensus bias could affect the determination and effectiveness with which majorities and minorities press their points in public discussion of local issues.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allison, S. T. , & Messick, D. M. (1988). The feature-positive effect, attitude strength, and degree of perceived consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 231-241.
2.
Crano, W. D. (1983). Assumed consensus of attitudes: The effect of vested interest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 597-608.
3.
Goethals, G. R. (1986). Fabricating and ignoring social reality: Self-serving estimates of concensus. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario Symposium on Social cognition (Vol. 4, pp. 135-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Judd, C. M. , & Johnson, J. T. (1981). Attitudes, polarization, and diagnosticity: Exploring the effects of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 26-36.
5.
Latané, B. , & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review, 88, 438-453.
6.
Maass, A. , & Clark, R. D. (1984). Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 428-450.
7.
Manstead, A. S. R. (1982). Perceived social support for opinions: A test of the magnitude and diversity hypotheses. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 35-41.
8.
Marks, G. , & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 72-90.
9.
Moscovici, S. , Lage, S., & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32, 365-379.
10.
Mullen, B. (1983). Egocentric bias in estimates of consensus. Journal of Social Psychology, 121, 31-38.
11.
Mullen, B. , Atkins, J. L., Champion, D. S., Edwards, C., Hardy, D., Story, J. E., & Vanderklok, M. (1985). The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 262-283.
12.
Mullen, B. , Driskell, J. E., & Smith, C. (1989). Availability and social projection: The effects of sequence of measurement and wording of question on estimates of consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 85-90.
13.
Mullen, B. , & Hu, L. (1988). Social projection as a function of congitive mechanisms: Two meta-analytic integrations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 333-356.
14.
Ross, L. , Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The "false consensus effect": An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
15.
Sanders, G. S. , & Mullen, B. (1983). Accuracy in perceptions of consensus: Differential tendencies of people with majority and minority positions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 57-70.
16.
Sherman, S. J. , Presson, C. C., & Chassin, L. (1984). Mechanisms underlying the false consensus effect: The special role of threats to the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 127-138.
17.
Sherman, S. J. , Presson, C. C., Chassin, L., Corty, E., & Olshavsky, R. (1983). The false consensus effect in estimates of smoking prevalence: Underlying mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 197-207.
18.
Suls, J. , & Wan, C. K. (1987). In search of the false-uniqueness phenomenon: Fear and estimates of social consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 211-217.
19.
Tabachnick, B. G. , & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
20.
Tabachnik, N. , Crocker, J., & Alloy, L. B. (1983). Depression, social comparison, and the false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 688-699.
21.
van der Pligt, J. (1984). Attributions, false consensus, and valence: Two field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 57-68.
22.
van der Pligt, J. , Ester, P., & van der Linden, J. (1983). Attitude extremity, consensus, and diagnosticity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 437-439.
23.
Wagner, W. , & Gerard, H. B. (1983). Similarity of comparison group, opinions about facts and values, and social projection. Archives of Psychology, 135, 313-324.
