This study tested the prediction that introspecting about the reasons for one's preferences would reduce satisfaction with a consumer choice. Subjects evaluated two types of posters and then chose one to take home. Those instructed to think about their reasons chose a different type of poster than control subjects and, when contacted 3 weeks later, were less satisfied with their choice. When people think about reasons, they appear to focus on attributes of the stimulus that are easy to verbalize and seem like plausible reasons but may not be important causes of their initial evaluations. When these attributes imply a new evaluation of the stimulus, people change their attitudes and base their choices on these new attitudes. Over time, however, people's initial evaluation of the stimulus seems to return, and they come to regret choices based on the new attitudes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brehm, J. W. (1956). Post-decision changes in desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384-389.
2.
Davidson, A. R. , Yantis, S., Norwood, M., & Montano, D. E. (1985). Amount of information about the attitude object and attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1184-1198.
3.
Erber, L. W. , Hodges, S. D., & Wilson, T. D. (in press). Attitude strength and attitude stability. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength Antecedents and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Franklin, B. (1950). The autobiography of Benjamin Franklin. New York: Pocket Books.
5.
Janis, I. L. , & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitmentNew York: Free Press.
6.
Koriat, A. , Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 107-118.
7.
Langer, E. J. (1978). Rethinking the role of thought in social interaction. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2, pp. 35-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Langer, E. J. (1989). Minding matters: The consequences of mindless-ness-mindfulness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advance in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 137-173). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9.
Lusk, C. M. , & Judd, C. M. (1988). Political expertise and the structural mediators of candidate evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 105-126.
10.
Millar, M. G. , & Tesser, A. (1986). Effects of affective and cognitive focus on the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 270-276.
11.
Millar, M. G. , & Tesser, A. (1989). The effects of affective-cognitive consistency and thought on the attitude-behavior relation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 189-202.
12.
Morrow, J. , & Nolan-Hoeksema, S. (1990). Effects of responses to depression on the remediation of depressive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 519-527.
13.
Nisbett, R. E. , & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know. Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
14.
Premack, D. , & Premack, A. J. (1983). The mind of an ape. New YorkNorton.
15.
Raiffa, H. (1968). Decision analysis. Reading, MA. Addison-Wesley.
16.
Ristau, C. A. , & Robbins, D. (1982). Language in the great apes: A critical review. In J. S. Rosenblatt, R. A. Hinde, C. Beer, & M. Busnel (Eds.), Advance in the study of behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 141-255). New York: Academic Press.
17.
Salancik, G. R. (1974). Inference of one's attitude from behavior recalled under linguistically manipulated cognitive sets. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 415-427.
18.
Schooler, J. W. , & Engsder-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.
19.
Schooler, J. W. , Ohlson, S., & Brooks, K. (1992). Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh.
20.
Seligman, C. , Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Effects of salience of extrinsic rewards on liking and loving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 453-460.
21.
Tesser, A. , Leone, C., & Clary, G. (1978). Affect control: Process constraints versus catharsis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2, 265-274.
22.
Wilson, T. D. (1990). Self-persuasion via self-reflection. In J. C. Olson & N. P. Zanna (Eds.), Self-inference processes: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 6, pp. 43-67). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
Wilson, T. D. , & Dunn, D. S. (1986). Effects of introspection on attitude-behavior consistency: Analyzing reasons versus focusing on feelings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 249-263.
24.
Wilson, T. D. , Dunn, D. S., Kraft, D., & Lisle, D. J. (1989). Introspection, attitude change, and attitude-behavior consistency: The disruptive effects of explaining why we feel the way we do. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 287-343). San Diego, CAAcademic Press.
25.
Wilson, T. D. , & Hodges, S. D. (1992). Attitudes as temporary constructions. In A. Tesser & L. Martin (Eds.), The construction of social judgment (pp. 37-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Wilson, T. D. , & Kraft, D. (in press). Why do I love thee? Effects of repeated introspections about a dating relationship on attitudes toward the relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
27.
Wilson, T. D. , Kraft, D., & Dunn, D. S. (1989). The disruptive effects of explaining attitudes: The moderating effect of knowledge about the attitude objectjournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 379-400.
28.
Wilson, T. D. , & LaFleur, S. J. (1993). [Effects of analyzing reasons on the accuracy of self-predictions]. Unpublished data, University of Virginia.
29.
Wilson, T. D. , & Schooler J. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181-192.
30.
Wood, W. (1982). Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 798-810.
