Attitudes are learned predispositions to respond in a consistently favorable or unfavorable manner with respect to a given object. Three studies examined whether responses elicited by an attitude object depend on the form in which the object is mentally represented. Subjects indicated their preferences for odors in response to descriptive labels (a symbolic representation) and in response to unlabeled scratch-and-sniff patches (a perceptual representation). The correspondence between ratings of symbolic and perceptual object representations was substantially lower than the reliability of ratings within either representational domain. Accessibility of attitudes (indexed by judgment times) was increased by prior expression of attitudes within the same representational domain but not by prior expression of attitudes in the other domain. Discussion considers the importance of these results for models of attitude structure and function.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ajzen, I. , & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.
2.
Alimena, B. S. (1962). A method of determining unbiased distribution in the Latin square. Psychometrika, 27, 315-317.
3.
Baron, R. A. (1980). Olfaction and human social behavior. Effects of pleasant scents on physical aggression. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 163-172.
4.
Baron, R. A. (1981). Olfaction and human social behavior: Effects of a pleasant scent on attraction and social perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 611-616.
5.
Baron, R. A. (1983). 'Sweet smell of success"? The impact of pleasant artificial scents on evaluations of job applicants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 68, 709-713.
6.
Baron, R. A. (1990). Environmentally induced positive affect: Its impact on self-efficacy, task performance, negotiation, and conflictJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 368-384.
7.
Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1191-1205.
8.
Breckler, S. J. , & Wiggins, E. C. (1989). On defining attitude and attitude theory: Once more with feeling. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), At the structure and function (pp. 407-427). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Cain, W. S. (1979). To know with the nose: Keys to odor identification. Science, 203, 467-470.
10.
Cain, W. S. (1988). Olfaction. In R. C. Atkinson (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 409-459). New York: John Wiley.
11.
Cain, W. S. , & Johnson, F. (1978). Liability of odor pleasantness: Influence of mere exposure. Perception, 7, 459-465.
12.
Davis, R. G. (1979). The microencapsulation of odorants as a method of stimulus control and delivery in studies of odor quality perception. Chemical Senses and Flavor, 4, 191-206.
13.
Doty, R. L. , Shaman, P., & Dann, M. (1984). Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test A standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function. Physiology and Behavior, 32, 489-502.
14.
Eagly, A. H. , & Chaiken, S. (1984). Cognitive theories of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advance min experimental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 267-359). New York: Academic Press.
15.
Ehrlichman, H. , & Bastone, L. (1992). Olfaction and emotion. In M. J. Serby & K. L. Chobor (Eds.), Science of olfaction (pp. 410-438). New York: Springer-Verlag.
16.
Engen, T. (1974). Method and theory in the study of odor preference. In A. Turk, J. W. Johnston, Jr., & D. G. Moulton (Eds.), Human responses to environmental odor (pp. 121-141). New York: Academic Press.
17.
Engen, T. (1979). The origin of preferences in taste and smell. In J. H. Kroeze (Ed.), Preference behaviour and chemoreception (pp. 263-271). London: Information Retrieval Limited.
18.
Engen, T. (1982). The perception of odors. New York: Academic Press.
19.
Engen, T. (1987). Remembering odors and their names. American Scientist, 75, 497-503.
20.
Engen, T. , & McBurney, D. H. (1964). Magnitude and category scales of the pleasantness of odors. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 435-440.
21.
Engen, T. , & Ross, B. M. (1973). Long-term memory of odors with and without verbal descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1X00, 221-227.
22.
Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (pp. 204-243). New York: Guilford.
23.
Fazio, R. H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 153-179). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Fazio, R. H. , & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 162-202). New York: Academic Press.
25.
Fishbein, M. , & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief attitude, intention, and behavior An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
26.
Greenwald, A. G. (1982). Is anyone in charge? Personalysis versus the principle of personal unity. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1, pp. 151-181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Greenwald, A. G. (1989). Why are attitudes important? In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 1-10). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Hilgard, E. (1986). Divided consciousness: Multiple controls in human thought and action, New York: Wiley.
29.
Johnson, M. K. (1983). A multiple-entry, modular memory system. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 81-123). New York: Academic Press.
30.
Jones, F. N. , Roberts, K., & Holman, E. W. (1978). Similarity judgments and recognition memory for some common spices. Perception and Psychophysics, 24, 2-6.
31.
LaPiere, R. T. (1934). Attitudes vs. actions. Social Forces, 13, 230-237.
32.
Lawless, H. T. , & Cain, W. S. (1975). Recognition memory for odors. Chemical Senses and Flavor, 1, 331-337.
33.
Levine, J. M. , & McBurney, D. H. (1986). The role of olfaction in social perception and behavior. In C. P. Herman, M. P. Zanna, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Physical appearance, stigma, and social behavior: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 3, pp. 179-217). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
McBurney, D. H. , Levine, J. M., & Cavanaugh, P. H. (1977). Psychophysical and social ratings of human body odor. Personality and Social Psychology BuUlen, 3, 135-138.
35.
Moskowitz, H. R. , Dravnieks, A., & Klarman, L. A. (1976). Odor intensity and pleasantness for a diverse set of odorants. Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 122-128.
36.
Ostrom, T. M. , Isaac, P. D., & McCann, C. D. (1983). 'Pairwise balanced' Latin squares should always be used for within-subjects designs. Unpublished technical report, Ohio State University, Department of Psychology, Columbus.
37.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
Palmer, S. E. (1978). Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 259-303). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
Petty, R E. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA.William C. Brown.
40.
Petty, R. E. , & Cacioppoj. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
41.
Petty, R. E. , Ostrom, T. M., & Brock, T. C. (Eds.). (1981). Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
Powell, M. C. , & Fazio, R. H. (1984). Attitude accessibility as a function of repeated attitudinal expression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 139-148.
43.
Pratkanis, A. R. , Breckler, S. J., & Greenwald, A. G. (Eds.). (1989). Attitude structure and function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
Richardson, J. T. E. , & Zucco, G. M. (1989). Cognition and olfaction: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 352-360.
45.
Rotton, J. (1983). Affective and cognitive consequences of malodorous pollution. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 4, 171-191.
46.
Schab, F. R. (1991). Odor memory: Taking stock. Psychological Bulletn, 109, 242-251.
47.
Schiffman, S. (1974). Physiochemical correlates of olfactory quality. Science, 185, 112-117.
48.
Sensonics, Inc. (1983). The Smell Identification Test administration manual. Haddonfield, NJ: Author.
49.
Sensonics, Inc. (1984). The Pod Smell Test. Haddonfield, NJ: Author.
50.
Wagenaar, W. A. (1969). Note on the construction of digram-balanced Latin squares. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 384-386.
51.
Wilson, T. D. (1985). Strangers to ourselves: The origins and accuracy of beliefs about one's own mental state. In J. H. Harvey & G. Weary (Eds.), Attribution. Basic issues and applications (pp. 9-36). New York: Academic Press.
