Subjects who had been tested in the previous 3 months for hypnotizability completed questionnaires that assessed trait indexes of absorption in imaginings, dissociation, and temporal lobe dysfunction. Half of the subjects completed the questionnaires in a context unrelated to their earlier hypnotizability testing while the remainder were explicitly informed of the experimenter's interest in the relationship between their questionnaire responses and hypnotizability. Correlations between each attribute variable and all indexes of hypnotizability were never significant in the out-of-context condition and always significant in their context condition. In addition, regression analyses indicated that context added significantly to the prediction of subjective hypnotizability scores by each of the attribute variables. Implications are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barber, T. X. (1964). Hypnotizability, suggestibility and personality: 5. A critical review of research findings. Psychological Reports, 14, 299-320.
2.
Bernstein, E. M. , & Putnam, F. W. (1986). Development, reliability and validity of a dissociation scale. Journal of Nervous and Men Disease, 174, 727-735.
3.
Council, J. R. , Kirsch, I., & Hafner, L. P. (1986). Expectancy versus absorption in the prediction of hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 182-189.
4.
de Groh, M. (1989). Correlates of hypnotic susceptibility. In N. P. Spanos & J. F. Chaves (Eds.), Hypnosis: The cognitive-behavioral perspective (pp. 32-63). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
5.
de Groot, H. P. , Gwynn, MK I., & Spanos, N. P. (1988). The effects of contextual information and gender on the prediction of hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1049-1053.
6.
Drake, S. D. , Nash, M. R., & Cawood, G. N. (1991). Imaginative involvement and hypnotic susceptibility: A re-examination of the relationship. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 10, 141-156.
7.
Edmonston, W. E. (1980). Hypnosis and relaxation Modern verification of an old equation. New York: Wiley.
8.
Finke, R. A. , & MacDonald, H. (1978). Two personality measures relating hypnotic susceptibility to absorption. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 26, 178-183.
9.
Hilgard, E. R. (1965). Hypnotic susceptibility. New York Harcourt, Brace & World.
10.
Hilgard, E. R. (1977). Divided consciousness. New York: Wiley.
11.
Hilgard, J. R. (1970). Personality and hypnosis: A study of imaginative involvement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Makarec, K. , & Persinger, M. A. (1985). Temporal lobe signs: Electro-encephalographic validity and enhanced scores in special populations. Perceptual and Motor Shills, 60, 831-842.
13.
Nadon, R. , Hoyt, I. P., Register, P. A., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1991). Absorption and hypnotizability: Context effects re-examined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 144-153.
14.
Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
15.
Perlini, A. H. , Lee, A., & Spanos, N. P. (1992). The relationship between imaginal ability and hypnotic susceptibility: Does context matter? Contemporary Hypnosis, 9, 35-41.
16.
Persinger, M. A. , & DeSano, C. F. (1986). Temporal lobe signs: Positive correlations with imaginings and hypnotic induction profiles. Psychological Reports, 58, 347-350.
17.
Roche, S. M. , & McConkey, K. M. (1990). Absorption: Nature, assessment and correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 91-111.
18.
Sheehan, P. W. , & Perry, C. W. (1976). Methodologies of hypnosis.+ Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Spanos, N. P. , & Barber, T. X. (1974). Toward a convergence in hypnosis research. American Psychologist, 29, 500-511.
20.
Spanos, N. P. , Brett, P. J., Menary, E. P., & Cross, W. P. (1987). A measure of attitudes toward hypnosis: Relationships with absorption and hypnotic susceptibility. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 30, 139-150.
21.
Spanos, N. P. , & McPeake, J. D. (1975). Involvement in everyday imaginative activities, attitudes toward hypnosis, and hypnotic suggestibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 594-598.
22.
Spanos, N. P. , Radtke, H. L., Hodgins, D. C., Stam, H. J., & Bertrand, L. D. (1983). The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Normative data and psychometric properties. Psychological Reports, 53, 523-535.
23.
Spanos, N. P. , Radtke, H. L., Hodgins, D. C., Stam, H. J., & Moretti, P. (1983). The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Relationships with other measures of hypnotic susceptibility, expectancies and absorption. Psychological Reports, 53, 723-734.
24.
Tellegen, A. (1982). The Differential Personality Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.
25.
Tellegen, A. , & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experience ("absorption"), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 268-277.
26.
Yanchar, R. J. , & Johnson, H. J. (1981). Absorption and attitudes toward hypnosis: A moderator analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29, 375-382.
