A meta-analytic integration of the cross-racialfacial identification effect is reported. The results indicate a significant, weak-to-moderate tendency for individuals to be more accurate in the recognition off aces of in-group members than those of out-group members. There is a trend for this effect to be stronger among White subjects than Black subjects. In addition, predictors exhibited different patterns for Black subjects and White subjects. Specifically, greater depth of processing engaged by experimental instructions in these studies strengthened the effect for White subjects and weakened it for Black subjects. Similarly, the cross-racial facial identification effect increased as a function of the duration of exposure to the target faces for White subjects but decreased as a function of duration of exposure for Black subjects. These results are explained in terms of recent theoretical developments concerning intergroup phenomena, particularly in terms of mechanisms of cognitive representations of in-groups and out-groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barkowitz, P. , & Brigham, J. C. (1982). Recognition of faces: Own-race bias, incentive, and time delay. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 255-268.
2.
Bothwell, R. K. , Brigham, J. C., & Malpass, R. S. (1989). Cross-racial identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 19-25.
3.
Brigham, J. C. (1991). Social psychology. New York: Harper Collins.
4.
Brigham, J. C. , & Barkowitz, P. (1978). Do "they all look alike? The effect of race, sex, experience, and attitudes on the ability to recognize faces. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 306-318.
5.
Brigham, J. C. , & Malpass, R. S. (1985). The role of experience and contact in the recognition of faces of own- and other-race persons. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 139-155.
6.
Brigham, J. C. , & Williamson, N. L. (1979). Cross-racial recognition and age: When you're over 60, do they still "all look alike? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 21-222.
7.
Brooks, L. (1978). Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Chance, J. , Goldstein, A. G., & McBride, L. (1975). Differential experience and recognition memory for faces. Journal of Social Psychology, 97, 243-253.
9.
Cross, J. F. , Cross, J., & Daly, J. (1971). Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Perception and Psychophysics, 10, 393-396.
10.
Devine, P. G. , & Malpass, R. S. (1985). Orienting strategies in differential face recognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 33-40.
11.
Ellis, H. D. , & Deregowski, J. B. (1981). Within-race and between-race recognition of transformed and untransformed faces. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 27-35.
12.
Feinman, S. , & Entwisle, D. R. (1976). Children's ability to recognize other children's faces. Child Development, 47, 506-510.
13.
Galper, R. E. (1973). "Functional race membership" and recognition of faces. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 455-462.
14.
Hamilton, D. L. , Katz, L. B., & Leirer, V. O. (1980). Organizational processes in impression formation. In R. Hastie,T. Ostrom, E. Ebbesen, R. Wyer, Jr., D. Hamilton, & D. Carlston (Eds.), Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Jones, E. E. , Wood, G. C., & Quattrone, G. A. (1981). Perceived variability of personal characteristics in ingroups and outgroups: The role of knowledge and evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 52-528.
16.
Lindsay, D. S. , Jack, P. C., & Christian, M. (1990). Other-race face perception Unpublished manuscript, McMaster University.
17.
Linville, P. , Fischer, G. W., & Salovey, P. (1989). Perceived distributions of the characteristics of ingroup members and outgroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165-188.
18.
Malpass, R. S. (1974). Racial bias in eyewitness identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,1, 42-44.
19.
Malpass, R S. , & Kravitz, J. (1969). Recognition for faces of own and other race. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 330-334.
20.
Malpass, R. S. , Lavigueur, H., & Weldon, D. E. (1973). Verbal and visual training in face recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 285-292.
21.
Medin, D. L. , Altom, M. W., & Murphy, T. D. (1984). Given versus induced category representations: Use of prototype and exemplar information in classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Lear- Mg, Memor, and Cognition, 10, 333-352.
22.
Medin, D. L. , & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
23.
Mullen, K. (1989). Advanced BASIC meta analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Mullen, B. (1991). Group composition, salience, and cognitive representations: The phenomenology of being in a group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 1-27.
25.
Mullen, B. , Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1990, August). Ingroup bias as a function of salience The effects of proportionate ingroup se and the reality of the groups. Paper presented at the 98th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston.
26.
Mullen, B. , & Hu, L. (1988). Social projection as a function of cognitive mechanisms: Two meta-analytic integrations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 333-356.
27.
Mullen, B. , & Hu, L. (1989). Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 233-252.
28.
Mullen, B. , Johnson, C., & Anthony, T. (1990). Prototype vs. exemplar processing of ingroup versus outgroup as a function of relative group sit The phenomenology of being in a group. Unpublished manuscript, Syracuse University.
29.
Mullen, B. , & Rosenthal, R. (1985). BASIC meta-analysis: Procedure and programs. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Park, B. , & Hastie, R. (1987). Perception of variability in category development Instance versus abstraction-based stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 621-635.
31.
Posner, M. I. , & Keele, S. W. (1970). Retention of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 304-308.
32.
Pryor, J. B. (1986). The influence of different encoding sets upon the formation of illusory correlations and group impressions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, IZ, 216-226.
33.
Reed, S. K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 382-407.
34.
Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedure for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35.
Sheperd, J. W. , Deregowski, J. B., & Ellis, H. D. (1974). A cross-cultural study for recognition memory for faces. International Journal of Psychology, 9, 205-211.
36.
Sherman, S. J. , & Corty, E. (1984). Cognitive heuristics. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Smith, E. E. , & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
Smith, E. R. , & Zarate, M. A. (1990). Exemplar and prototype use in social cognition. Social Cognition, 8, 243-262.
