On the basis of the elaboration likelihood model and self-awareness theory, it was reasoned that self-awareness should stimulate thoughtful resistance to attacks on personally important attitudes. In Experiment 1, mirror-induced self-awareness increased resistance to a message that was counterattitudinal, personally important, and based on direct experience, but it failed to increase resistance to a message that lacked those qualities. In Experiment 2, self-aware subjects showed greater resistance to weak persuasive arguments than to strong arguments, unlike subjects who were not made self-aware. These results support the view of self-awareness as a cause of biased central route processing and (hence) of selective, judicious resistance to persuasion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactanceOrlando, FLAcademic Press.
2.
Cacioppo, J. T. , & Pett, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
3.
Cacioppo, J. T. , Petty, R. E., Kao, C. F., & Rodriguez, R. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1032-1043.
4.
Carver, C. S. , & Scheier, M. F. (1977). Self-consciousness and reactance. Journal of Research in Personality, 15(1), 16-29.
5.
Carver, C. S. , & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
6.
Chaiken, S. , Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. Uleman & J. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252).New York: Guilford Press.
7.
Cialdini, R. B. , Petty, R. E. (1981). Anticipatory opinion effects. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 217-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Cialdini, R. B. , Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 357-404.
9.
Duval S. , & Wicklund, R. A. (1972). A theory of objective self-awareness. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
10.
Duval, S. , & Wicklund, R. A. (1973). Effects of objective self-awareness on attribution of causality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 17-31.
11.
Fazio, R. H. , Powell, M. C., & Herr, P. M. (1983). Toward a process model of the attitude-behavior relation: Accessing one's attitude upon mere observation of the attitude object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 723-735.
12.
Fazio, R. H. , & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505-514.
13.
Fenigstein, A. , Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522-527.
14.
Froming, W. J. , Walker, G. R., & Lopyan, K. J. (1982). Public and private self-awareness: When personal attitudes conflict with societal expectations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 18, 476-487.
15.
Gibbons, F. X. (1983). Self-focused attention and self-report validity: The "veridicality" hypothesis. Journal of Personality, 51, 517-542.
16.
Gibbons, F. X. , & Wright, R. A. (1983). Self-focused attention and reactions to conflicting standards. Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 263-273.
17.
Hull, J. G. , & Levy, A. S. (1979). The organizational functions of the self: An alternative to the Duval and Wicklund model of self-awareness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 756-768.
18.
Lord, C. G. , Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
19.
McGuire, W. J. (1969). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 233-346). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20.
Petty, R. E. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue-involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915-1926.
21.
Petty, R. E. , & Cacioppo J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C Brown.
22.
Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986a). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
23.
Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986b). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 124-206). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
24.
Petty, R. E. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367-374.
25.
Petty, R. E. , Cacioppo J. T., & Haugtvedt, C. P. (in press). Ego-involvement and persuasion: An appreciative look at the Sherifs' contribution to the study of self-relevance and attitude change. In D. Granberg & G. Sarup (Eds.), Social judgment and intergroup relations: A Festschrift for Muzafer Sheirf. New York: Springer-Verlag.
26.
Petty, R. E. , Cacioppo, J. T., Sedikides, C., & Strathman, A. (1988). Affect and persuasion. American Behavioral Scientist, 31, 355-371.
27.
Pryor, J. B. , Gibbons, R. X., Wicklund, R. A., Fazio, R. H., & Hood, R. (1977). Self-focused attention and self-report validity. Journal of Personality, 45, 514-527.
28.
Scheier, M. F. , & Carver, C. S. (1980). Private and public self-attention, resistance to change, and dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 390-405.
29.
Taylor, S. E. (1981). The interface of cognitive and social psychology. In J. H. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Wu, C. , & Shaffer, D. R. (1987). Susceptibility to persuasion as a function of source credibility and prior experience with the attitude object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 677-688.
