An experiment examined the attention allocation strategies that perceivers employ when they are confronted with expectancy-relevant information and the mediating roles that these strategies play in impression formation. A dichotic listening task was used to measure subjects' attention allocation strategies. Subjects monitored a control child in one ear, while in the other ear they heard a target child perform in a manner that was either initially consistent or inconsistent with their expectations. They then evaluated the target on a number of dimensions. Subjects who received initially inconsistent information from the target allocated more attention to him and became more cognitively complex in their final evaluations than subjects who received initially consistent information. Furthermore, the greater attention paid by these subjects led them to become more moderate in their evaluations of the target. The results are discussed in light of the person perception literature.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, N. H. (1965). Averaging versus adding as a stimulus combination rule in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 394-400.
2.
Anderson, N. E. S. , & Norman, A. (1964). Order effects in impression formation in four classes of stimuli. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 467-471.
3.
Bargh, J. A. , & Thein, R. D. (1985). Individual construct accessibility, person memory, and the recall-judgment link: The case of information overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1129-1146.
4.
Belmore, S. M. (1987). Determinants of attention during impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 480-489.
5.
Belmore, S. M. , & Hubbard, M. L. (1987). The role of advance expectancies in person memoryJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 61-70.
6.
Bruner, J. S. (1957). Going beyond the information given. In J. S. Bruner, E. Brunswik, L. Festinger, F. Heider, K. F. Muenzinger, C. E. Osgood, & D. Rapaport (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to cognition (pp. 41-69). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 554-559.
8.
Cohen, C. E. (1981). Person categories and social perception: Testing some boundaries of the processing effects of prior knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 441-452.
9.
Darley, J. M. , Fleming, J. H., Hilton, J. L., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (1988). Dispelling negative expectancies: The impact of interaction goals and target characteristics on the expectancy confirmation process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 19-36.
10.
Darley, J. M. , & Goethals, G. R. (1980). People's analyses of the causes of ability-linked performance. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 1-37). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
11.
Darley, J. M. , & Gross, P. H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 20-33.
12.
Erber, R. , & Fiske, S. T. (1984). Outcome dependency and attention to inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 709-726.
13.
Fischoff, B. , & Beyth, R. (1975). "I knew it would happen": Remembered probabilities of once-future things. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 1-16.
14.
Fiske, S. T. , & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
15.
Fiske, S. T. , & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
Gollwitzer, P. M. , & Kinney, R. F. (1989). Effects of deliberative and implemental mind-sets on illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psycology, 56, 531-542.
17.
Hastie, R. (1980). Memory for behavioral information that confirms or contradicts a personality impression. In R. Hastie, T. M. Ostrom, E. B. Ebbesen, R. S. Wyer, D. L. Hamilton, & D. E. Carlston (Eds.), Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception (pp. 155-177). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Hastie, R. , & Kumar, P. A. (1979). Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 25-38.
19.
Hastie, R. , Park, B., & Weber, R. (1984). Social memory. In R S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 151-212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of intepersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
21.
Hemsley, G. D. , & Marmurek, H. H. C. (1982). Person memory: The processing of consistent and inconsistent person information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 433-438.
22.
Jones, E. E. , & Goethals, G. R. (1971). Order effects in impression formation: Attribution context and the nature of the entity. In E. E. Jones, D. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
23.
Jones, E. E. , & McGillis, D. (1976). Correspondent inferences and the attribution cube: A comparative reappraisal. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Jones, E. E. , Rock, L., Shaver, K. G., Goethals, G. R., & Ward, L. M. (1968). Pattern of performance and ability attribution: An unexpected primacy effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 317-340.
25.
Kulik,J. A. (1983). Confirmatory attribution and the perpetuation of social beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1171-1181.
26.
Linville, P. W. (1982). The complexity-extremity effect and age-based stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 193-211.
27.
Linville, P. W. , & Jones, E. E. (1980). Polarized appraisals of outgroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 689-703.
28.
Lord, C. G. , Ross, L., & Lepper, M. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
29.
Mayo, C. W. , & Crockett, W. H. (1964). Cognitive complexity and primacy-recency effects in impression formation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 335-388.
30.
Moray, N. (1969). Listening and attention. Baltimore: Penguin Books.
31.
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. New York: W. H. Freeman.-
32.
Nidorff, L. J. , & Crockett, W. H. (1965). Cognitive complexity and the integration of conflicting information in written impressions. Journal of Social Psychology, 66, 165-169.
33.
Neuberg, S. L. (1989). The goal of forming accurate impressions during social interactions: Attenuating the impact of negative expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 374-386.
34.
Neuberg, S. L. , & Fiske, S. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 431-441.
35.
Pyszczynski, T. A. , & Greenberg, J. (1981). Role of disconfirmed expectancies in the instigation of attributional processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 31-38.
36.
Rosenkrantz, P. S. , & Crockett, W. H. (1965). Some factors influencing the assimilation of disparate information in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 397-402.
37.
Scott, W. A. , Osgood, D. W., & Peterson, C. (1979). Cognitive structure: Theory and measurement of individual differences. Washington, DC: Winston.
38.
Shapiro,J. , & Hilton,J. L. (1988, May). The impact of interaction goals on expectancy confirmation. Paper presented at the 60th Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
39.
Skowronski, J. J. , & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 131-142.
40.
Snyder, M. , & Cantor, N. (1979). Testing hypotheses about other people: The. use of historical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 330-342.
41.
Snyder, M. , & Swann, W. B., Jr. (1978). Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1202-1212.
42.
Srull, T. K. (1981). Person memory: Some tests of associative storage and retrieval models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 440-463.
43.
Srull, T. K. , & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96, 58-83.
44.
Tesser, A. , & Leone, C. (1977). Cognitive schemas and thought as determinants of attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 340-356.
45.
Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 74-83.
46.
Treisman, A. M. (1969). Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review, 76, 282-299.
47.
Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93, 239-257.
48.
Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129-140.
49.
White,J. D. , & Carlston, D. E. (1983). Consequences of schemata for attention, impressions, and recall in complex social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 538-549.
