Negative information has a stronger influence on impressions of others than positive information, a tendency known as the negativity effect. The hypothesis that this effect would characterize impressions of presidential candidates was tested using National Election Study surveys from 1984 and 1988. Respondents rated the presidential candidates on a number of personality traits. Aggregate-level analyses revealed that personality characteristics that the nation, on average, judged to represent character weaknesses were more predictive of overall evaluations and voting than characteristics judged to represent strengths. At the idiographic level, it was found that a trait was significantly more predictive when it fell below an individual's average trait rating for a candidate than when it was located above this mean. Thus, character weaknesses were more important than strengths in determining the public's evaluations of the candidate and the ultimate vote.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abelson, R. P. , & Levi, A. (1985). Decision making and decision theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed, Vol 1). New York: Random House.
2.
Aldrich, J. H. , & Nelson, F. D. (1984). Linear probability, logit, and probit models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
Anderson, N. H. (1965). Averaging versus adding as a stimulus combination rule in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 394-400.
4.
Briscoe, M. E. , Woodyard, H. D., & Shaw, M. E. (1967). Personality impression change as a function of the favorableness of the first impressions. Journal of Personality, 35, 343-357.
5.
Hamilton, D. L. , & Huffman, L. J. (1971). Generality of impression-formation processes for evaluative and non-evaluative judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 200-207.
6.
Hamilton, D. L. , & Zanna, M. (1972). Differential weighting of favor-able and unfavorable attributes in impressions of personality. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 204-212.
7.
Jones, E. E. , & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
8.
Jones, E. E. , & McGillis, D. (1976). Correspondent inferences and the attribution cube: A comparative reappraisal. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision making under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
10.
Kanouse, D. E. , & Hanson, L. R. (1972). Negativity in evaluations. In E. E. Jones, D. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attributions: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
11.
Kinder, D. R. , & Abelson, R. P. (1981, September). Appraising presidential candidates: Personality and affect in the 1980 campaign. Paper presented at the American Political Science Convention, New York.
12.
Kinder, D. R. , & Sears, D. O. (1985). Public opinion and political action. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2). New York: Random House.
13.
Kogan, N. , & Wallach, M. A. (1967). Risk-taking as a function of the situation, the person, and the group. In T. M. Newcomb (Ed.), New directions in psychology III (pp. 111-278). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
14.
Lau, R. R. (1982). Negativity in political perception. Political Behavior4, 353-378.
15.
Lau, R. R. (1985). Two explanations for negativity effects in political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 119-138.
16.
Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1980). Applied regression: An introduction. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
Rettig, S. , & Rawson, H. (1963). The risk hypothesis in predictive judgments of unethical behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 243-248.
18.
Richey, M. H. , Bono, F. S., Lewis, H. V., & Richey, H. W. (1982). Selectivity of negative bias in impression formation. Journal of Social Psychology, 116, 107-118.
19.
Richey, M. H. , Koenigs, H. W., Richey, H. W., & Fortin, R. (1975). Negative salience in impressions of character: Effects of unequal proportions of positive and negative information. Journal of Social Psychology, 97, 233-241.
20.
Sears, D. O. (1983). A person positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 233-250.
21.
Skowronski, J. J. , & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 131-142.
22.
Slovic, P. (1969). Differential effects of real versus hypothetical payoffs on choices among gambles. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 434-437.
23.
Van Der Plight, J. , & Fiser, J. R. (1980). Negativity and descriptive extremity in impression formation. European Journal of Psychology, 10, 415-419.
24.
Warr, P. , & Jackson, P. (1977). Salience, importance, and evaluation in judgments about people. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 35-45.
25.
Wyer, R. S. (1970). Information redundancy, inconsistency, and novelty and their role in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 111-127.
