Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Two experiments examined the role that the consistency between a perceiver's stereotype and a target's behavior plays in the judgment of stereotype-relevant behaviors. In Experiment 1, consistency was varied through a manipulation of the objective properties of the behavior and its referent distribution. Ambiguous behaviors were assimilated to the stereotype when they were objectively consistent with the stereotype and were contrasted away from the stereotype when they were objectively inconsistent with the stereotype. In Experiment 2, perceived consistency was manipulated directly while objective consistency was held constant. Behaviors were identified either with members of random groups, with members of extended families, or with single individuals. Consistent with predictions, the tendency to assimilate ambiguous behaviors increased as expected consistency increased. These findings are discussed in light of recent work on contrast and assimilation and stereotyping.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Amhoff, F. N. (1954). Some factors affecting the unreliability of clinical judgments. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 10, 272-275.

Bruner, J. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152.

Duncan, B. (1976). Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup violence: Testing the lower limits of stereotyping of blacks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 590-598.

Herr, P. M. (1986). Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1106-1115.

Herr, P. M. , Sherman, S. J. , & Fazio, R. H. (1983). On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 323-340.

Higgins, E. T. , Rholes, W. S. , & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154.

Hilton, J. L. , & Darley, J. M. (1985). Constructing other persons: A limit on the effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 1-18.

Hilton, J. L. , & Fein, S. (1989). The role of typical diagnosticity in stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 201-211.

10.

Jones, E. E. , & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

11.

Jussim, L. , Coleman, L. M. , & Lerch, L. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 536-546.

12.

Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

13.

Locksley, A. , Borgida, E. , Brekke, N. , & Hepburn, C. (1980). Sex stereotypes and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 821-831.

14.

Manis, M. , Nelson, T. E. , & Shedler, J. (1988). Stereotypes and social judgment: Extremity, assimilation, and contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 28-36.

15.

Manis, M. , Paskewitz, J. , & Cotler, S. (1986). Stereotypes and social judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 461-473.

16.

Nisbett, R. E. , Zukier, H. , & Lemley, R. E. (1981). The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic information. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 248-277.

17.

Norman, D. A. , & Bobrow, D. G. (1975). On data limited and resource limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44-64.

18.

Pyszczynski, T. A. , & Greenberg, J. (1981). Role of disconfirmed expectancies in the instigation of attributional processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 31-38.

19.

Sherif, M. , & Hovland, C. T. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

20.

Srull, T. K. (1981). Person memory: Some tests of associative storage and retrieval models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 440-463.

21.

Srull, T. K. , & Wyer, R. S. (1980). Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 841-856.

22.

Taylor, S. (1981). A categorization approach to stereotyping. In D. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

23.

Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93, 239-257.

24.

Weber, R. , & Crocker, J. (1983). Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 961-977.

The Role of Consistency in the Judgment of Stereotype-Relevant Behaviors

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References