Berkowitz and Devine (this issue) cite Lord, Ross, and Lepper's study of attitude polarization as evidence that current researchers are reinventing dissonance results without realizing it. They also cite Cooper and Fazio's review as evidence that current researchers have excessively narrowed the scope of dissonance theory. They regard these tendencies to overlook and narrow dissonance theory as symptomatic of a pervasive analytic, rather than synthetic, approach to studying human social behavior. In reviewing the evidence cited by Berkowitz and Devine, other interpretations are possible.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abelson, R. P. (1959). Modes of resolution of belief dilemmas. Conflict Resolution, 3, 343-352.
2.
Abelson, R. P. (1983). Whatever became of consistency theory? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 37-54.
3.
Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A source book (pp. 5-27). Skokie, IL: Rand McNally.
4.
Aronson, E. , Turner, J. A., & Carlsmith, J. N. (1963). Communicator credibility and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 31-36.
5.
Baumeister, R. (1987). How the self became a problem: A psychological review of historical research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 163-176.
6.
Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
7.
Brown, H. I. (1979). Perception, theory & commitment: A new philosophy of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Cooper, J. , & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 229-266). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
9.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. New York: Harper & Row.
10.
Gergen, K. J. (1978). Toward generative theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1344-1360.
11.
Gollwitzer, P. M. , & Wicklund, R. A. (1985). Self-symbolizing and the neglect of others' perspectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 702-715.
12.
Greenwald, A. G. , Pratkanis, A. R., Leippe, M. R., & Baumgardner, M. H. (1986). Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress? Psychological Review, 93, 216-229.
13.
Higgins, E. T. (1989). Self-discrepancy theory: What patterns of self-beliefs cause people to suffer? In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 93-136). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
14.
Lord, C. G. , Lepper, M. R., & Preston, E. (1985). Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1231-1243.
15.
Lord, C. G. , Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
16.
McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 233-346). New York: Random House.
17.
Schlenker, B. R. (1982). Translating actions into attitudes: An identity-analytic approach to the explanation of social conduct. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 194-247). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
18.
Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181-227). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
19.
Vallacher, R. R. , & Wegner, D. M. (1985). Action identification theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
Wicklund, R. A. , & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1982). Symbolic self-completion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
