The core assumptions of Buss and Craik's act-frequency approach are analyzed, with special emphasis on their conception of personal dispositions. Points of critique are (1) a positivistic interpretation of personal dispositions, (2) lack of empirical content of the integration of prototypicality and fuzzy sets notions, (3) the unrealistic conception of traits, and (4)problems with the metric underlying the act-frequency approach. The author argues that a philosophical critical realist's interpretation of dispositions is more appropriate given the central research topics in personality psychology, that the integration of the cognitive concepts still needs a demonstration of its worth, and that some of the new metric possibilities do not make much sense. The final thesis is that the act-frequency approach's proposal to aggregate individual data, an idea born of the consistency debate of the seventies, bypasses the original main issue: the explanation and prediction of single behavioral acts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Angleitner, A. , Buss, D. M., & Demtrdder, A. I. (in press). A cross-cultural comparison using the act frequency approach in West Germany and the United States. European Journal of Personality.
2.
Angleitner, A. , & Demtrdder, A. I. (1988). Acts and dispositions: A reconsideration of the act frequency approach (AFA). European Journal of Personality, 2, 121-142.
3.
Atkinson, J. W. (1958). Motives in fantasy, action and society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
4.
Atkinson, J. W. (1983). Personality, motivation, and action. New York: Praeger.
5.
Bem, D. J. (1983). Toward a response style theory of persons in situations. In M. M. Page (Ed.), Personality: Current theory and research. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1982 (pp. 201-231). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
6.
Bem, D. J. , & Allen, A. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 506-520.
7.
Berk, R. A. (1980). Criterion-referenced measurement: The state of the art. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 395-479). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
9.
Bloom, B. S. (1964). Stability and change in human characteristics. New York: John Wiley.
10.
Borkenau, P. (1986). Toward an understanding of trait interrelations: Acts as instances of several traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 371-381.
11.
Bridgman, P. W. (1927). The logic of modern physics. New York: Macmillan.
12.
Bunge, M. (1967). Scientific research (Vols. 1 and 2). Berlin: Springer.
13.
Buss, D. M. (1985). The temporal stability of acts, trends, and patterns. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 5, pp. 165-196). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Buss, D. M. , & Craik, K. H. (1981). The act frequency analysis of interpersonal dispositions: Aloofness, gregariousness, dominance, and submissiveness. Journal of Personality, 49, 174-192.
15.
Buss, D. M. , & Craik, K. H. (1983a). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90, 105-126.
16.
Buss, D. M. , & Craik, K. H. (1983b). The dispositional analysis of everyday conduct. Journal of Personality, 51, 393-412.
17.
Buss, D. M. , & Craik, K. H. (1984). Acts, dispositions, and personality. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (pp. 241-301). New York: Academic Press.
18.
Buss, D. M. , & Craik, K. H. (1985). Why not measure that trait? Alternative criteria for identifying important dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 934-946.
19.
Cantor, N. , Mischel, W., & Schwartz, J. (1982). Social knowledge: Structure, content, use and abuse. In A. Hastorf & A. Isen (Eds.), Cognitive social psychology. New York: Elsevier North-Holland.
20.
Emmons, R. A. , & Diener, E. (1986). Situation selection as a moderator variable of response consistency and stability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1013-1019.
21.
Epstein, S. (1979). The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1097-1126.
22.
Gangestad, S. , & Snyder, M. (1985). "To carve nature at its joints": On the existence of discrete classes in personality. Psychological Review, 92, 317-349.
23.
Hyland, M. E. (1985). Do person variables exist in different ways?American Psychologist, 40, 1003-1010.
24.
Jackson, D. N. , & Paunonen, S. V. (1985). Construct validity and the predictability of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 554-570.
25.
Kenrick, D. T. , & Dantchick, A. (1983). Interactionism, idiographics, and the social psychological invasion of personality. Journal of Personality, 51, 286-307.
26.
Lord, F. M. , & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27.
MacCorquodale, K. , & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95-107.
28.
McClelland, D. C. , Davis, W. N., Kalin, R., & Wanner, E. (1972). The drinking man. New York: Free Press.
29.
Messick, S. (1981). Constructs and their vicissitudes in educational and psychological measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 575-588.
30.
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: John Wiley.
31.
Mischel, W. (1979). On the interface of cognition and personality. American Psychologist, 34, 740-754.
32.
Mischel, W. (1984). Convergences and challenges in the search for consistency. American Psychologist, 39, 351-364.
33.
Mischel, W. , & Peake, P. K. (1982). Beyond deja vu in the search for cross-situational consistency. Psychological Review, 89, 730-755.
34.
Mischel, W. , & Peake, P. K. (1983). Analyzing the construction of consistency in personality. In M. M. Page (Ed.), Personality: Current theory and research. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1982 (pp. 233-262). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
35.
Moser, K. , & Gerth, A. (1986). Construction and validation of a power motive questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 58, 83-86.
36.
Pervin, L. A. (1985). Personality: Current controversies, issues, and directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 83-114.
37.
Richter, M. L. , & Seay, M. B. (1987). ANOVA designs with subjects and stimuli as random effects: Application to prototype effects on recognition memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 470-480.
38.
Semin, G. R. , & Krahé, B. (1987). Lay conceptions of personality: Eliciting tiers of a scientific conception of personality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 199-200.
39.
Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York: Free Press.
40.
Winter, D. G. , & Stewart, A. J. (1978). The power motive. In H. London & J. E. Exner (Eds.), Dimensions of personality (pp. 391-447). New York: John Wiley.
41.
Zadeh, L. A. , Fu, K. S., Tanaka, K., & Shimura, M. (Eds.). (1975). Fuzzy sets and their applications to cognitive and decision processes. New York: Academic Press.
