It was hypothesized that personal involvement affects actors' and observers' effort, ability, difficulty, and luck attributions. In addition, different involvement levels were expected to affect actors' and observers' consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency information estimates. Results partially confirm Kelley's attribution model. The findings support the notion that involvement is relevant to interpretations of actors' and observers' attribution differences and information inferences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arkin, R. M. , Gabrenya, W. K., Jr., & McGarvey, B. (1978). The role of social perspective in perceiving the causes of success and failure. Journal of Personality, 46, 762-777.
2.
Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A re-examination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 56-71.
3.
Campbell, J. D. , & Fairey, P. J. (1985). Effects of self-esteem, hypothetical explanations, and verbalization of expectancies on future performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(5), 1097-1111.
4.
Carver, C. S. , Blaney, P. H., & Scheier, M. F. (1979). Reassertion and giving up: The interactive role of self-directed attention and outcome expectancy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1859-1870.
5.
Carver, C. S. , DeGregorio, E., & Gillis, R. (1980). Field-study of evidence of an ego-defensive bias in attribution among two categories of observers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6(1), 44-50.
6.
Carver, C. S. , & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Outcome expectancy, locus of attribution for expectancy, and self-directed attention as determinants of evaluations and performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 184-200.
7.
Chaikin, A. L. , & Cooper, J. (1973). Evaluation as a function of correspondence and hedonic relevance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 257-264.
8.
Cunningham, J. D. , Starr, P. A., & Kanouse, D. E. (1979). Self as actor, active observer, and passive observer: Implications for causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(7), 1146-1152.
9.
Eisen, S. V. (1979). Actor-observer differences in information inference and causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(2), 261-272.
10.
Ferguson, T. J. , & Wells, G. L. (1980). Priming of mediators in causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 461-470.
11.
Glass, G. V. , & Hopkins, K. D. (1984). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12.
Hansen, R. D. , & Donoghue, J. M. (1977). The power of consensus: Information derived from one's own and others' behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 294-303.
13.
Hill, C. T. , & Jones, J. M. (1973). Effects of prejudice and perspective on attribution of intentionality. Proceedings of the 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 8, 347-348.
14.
Jones, E. E. , & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266). New York: Academic Press.
15.
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
16.
Kelley, H. H. (1971). Attribution in social interaction. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
17.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
18.
McArthur, L. Z. (1972). The how and what of why: Some determinants and consequences of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 171-193.
19.
Miller, D. T. , & Norman, S. A. (1975). Actor-observer differences in perceptions of effective control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 503-515.
20.
Pruitt, D. J. , & Insko, C. A. (1980). Extension of the Kelley attribution model: The role of comparison-object consensus, target-object consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 39-58.
21.
Orvis, B. R. , Cunningham, J. D., & Kelley, H. H. (1975). A close examination of causal inference: The roles of consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 605-616.
22.
Ross, L. , Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The "false consensus effect": An egocentric bias in social perception and attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
23.
Ruble, D. N. , & Feldman, N. S. (1976). Order of consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency information and causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 930-937.
24.
Sherman, S. T. , Skov, R. B., Hervitz, E. F., & Stock, C. B. (1981). The effects of explaining hypothetical future events: From possibility to probability to actuality and beyond. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 142-158.
25.
Sherrod, D. R. , & Farber, J. (1975). The effect of previous actor/observer role experience on attribution of responsibility for failure. Journal of Personality, 43(2), 231-247.
26.
Snyder, L. , Stephan, W. G., & Rosenfield, D. (1976). Egotism and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 435-441.
27.
Storms, M. D. (1973). Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing actors' and observers' point of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 165-175.
28.
Tillman, W. S. , & Carver, C. S. (1980). Actors' and observers' attributions for success and failure: A comparative test of predictions from Kelley's cube, self-serving biases, and positivity bias formulations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 18-32.
29.
Weary, G. (1980). Examination of affect and egotism as mediators of bias in causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 348-357.
30.
Wyer, R. S., Jr. , Henninger, M., & Hinkle, R. (1977). An information analysis of actors' and observers' belief attributions in a role-playing situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 199-217.
31.
Zuckerman, M. , & Mann, R. W. (1979). The other way around: Effects of causal attributions on estimates of consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 582-597.
