Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We examined people's beliefs about how well an individual's evaluations can predict the average evaluations of a group and how well a group's average evaluations can predict those of an individual. The individual in question was either the self or a stranger. Subjects believed that the group predicts a stranger better than the stranger predicts the group, but believed that the self predicts the group as well as or better than the group predicts the self This asymmetry in estimates of predictability mirrors asymmetries found by other researchers for similarity judgments, suggesting that beliefs about predictability may be guided by similarity judgments. This may lead to errors in predictions about self and others, including the false consensus bias.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fischhoff, B. , Slovic, P. , & Lichtenstein, S. (1979). Subjective sensitivity analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 339-359.

Fong, G. T. , Krantz, D. H. , & Nisbett, R. E. (1986). The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 253-292.

Holyoak, K. J. , & Gordon, P. C. (1979). Social reference points. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 881-887.

Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of repre-sentativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.

Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.

Kendall, M. G. (1962). Rank correlation methods. London: Charles Griffin.

Klein, S. B. , & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1986). Elaboration, organization, and the self-reference effect in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 26-38.

Kunda, Z. , & Nisbett, R. E. (1986a). The psychometrics of everyday life. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 195-224.

Kunda, Z. , & Nisbett, R. E. (1986b). Prediction and the partial understanding of the law of large numbers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 339-354.

10.

Nisbett, R. E. , Krantz, D. H. , Jepson, C. , & Kunda, Z. (1983). The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 90, 339-363.

11.

Nisbett, R. E. , & Kunda, Z. (1985). The perception of social distributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 297-311.

12.

Nisbett, R. E. , & Ross L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

13.

Ross, L. , Greene, D. , & House, P. (1977). The false consensus phenomenon: An attributional bias in self-perception and social perception processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.

14.

Srull, T. K. , & Gaelick, L. (1983). General principles and individual differences in the self as habitual reference point: An examination of the self-other judgments of similarity. Social Cognition, 2, 108-121.

15.

Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.

16.

Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. (1980). Causal schemas in judgment about uncertainty. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Predicting Individual Evaluations from Group Evaluations and Vice Versa

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References