This study assessed the attributional dimensionality of explanations, largely for interpersonal problems, that occur naturally in the newspaper advice columns. We applied two definitions of controllability, along with stability, locus, and actor observer ratings, to 145 attributions extracted from the "Ann Landers" and "Dear Abby" columns by Schoeneman and Rubanowitz (1985). Controllability by subject (the person whose behavior is being explained) was confounded with locus, although controllability by anyone was independent of locus. Actors attributed their own problems to the enduring, willful behaviors of others (external, stable, controllable attributions). Observers did not attribute actors' problems to uncontrollable personality; they showed no attributional tendencies except a preference for stable attributions. We discuss the convergence of actor-observer effects with current research on interpersonal attributions and implications for future ratings of controllability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, L. Y. , Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49-74.
2.
Dibner, S. S. (1974). Newspaper advice columns as a mental health resource. Community Mental Health Journal, 10, 147-155.
3.
Fincham, F. , & O'Leary, K. D. (1983). Causal inferences for spouse behavior in maritally distressed and nondistressed couples. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1, 42-57.
4.
Graham, S. , & Long, A. (1986). Race, class, and the attribution process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 4-13.
5.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A. , & Jacobson, N. S. (1985). Causal attributions of married couples: When do they search for causes? What do they conclude when they do? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1398-1412.
6.
Jacobson, N. S. , McDonald, D. W., Follette, W. C., & Berley, R. A. (1985). Attributional processes in distressed and nondistressed married couples. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9, 35-50.
7.
Jones, E. E. , & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent, perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
8.
Kennedy, J. J. (1983). Analyzing qualitative data. New York: Praeger.
9.
Kyle, S. O. , & Falbo, T. (1985). Relationships between marital stress and attributional preferences for own and spouse behavior. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 3, 339-351.
10.
Larrance, D. F. , & Twentyman, C. T. (1983). Maternal attributions and child abuse. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 449-457.
11.
Lau, R. R. , & Russell, D. (1980). Attributions in the sports pages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 29-38.
12.
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world. New York: Plenum.
13.
Marlatt, G. A. , & Gordon, J. R. (1985). Relapse prevention: Maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors. New York: Guilford.
14.
McAuley, E. , & Gross, J. B. (1983). Perceptions of causality in sport: An application of the Causal Dimension ScaleJournal of Sport Psychology, 5, 278-287.
15.
Michela, J. , Peplau, L. A., & Weeks, D. (1982). Perceived dimensions of attributions for loneliness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 929-936.
16.
Orvis, B. R. , Kelley, H. H., & Butler, D. (1976). Attributional conflict in young couples. In J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. R. Kidd (Eds.)., New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 353-386). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Russell, D. (1982). The Causal Dimension Scale: A measure of how individuals perceive causes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1137-1145.
18.
Schoeneman, T. J. , Cheek, P. R., Fischer, K., Hollis, J. F., & Stevens, V. J. (1985, August). Attributions for success and failure following smoking cessation treatment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.
19.
Schoeneman, T. J. , & Rubanowitz, D. E. (1985) Attributions in the advice columns: Actors and observers, causes and reasons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 315-325.
20.
Schoeneman, T. J. , van Uchelen, C., Stonebrink, S., & Cheek, P. R. (1986). Expectancy, outcome, and event type: Effects on retrospective reports of attributional activity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 353-362.
21.
Shaver, K. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101-113.
22.
Tennen, H. , Affleck, G., & Gershman, K. (1986). Self-blame among parents of infants with perinatal complications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 690-696.
23.
Timko, C. , & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1985). Attributions, vulnerability, and psychological adjustment: The case of breast cancer. Health Psychology, 4, 521-544.
24.
Weary Bradley, G. (1979). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 56-71.
25.
Weiner, B. (1985a). "Spontaneous" causal thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 74-84.
26.
Weiner, B. (1985b). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
