Perceived Behavioral Consistency Underlying Trait Attributions to Oneself and Another

Abstract

This psychometric study was designed to investigate the hypothesis that people perceive themselves as more variable than others, even when they judge themselves and the other person identically on a trait-rating scale. Using one of two different types of rating formats, subjects described themselves and a person of the same sex and approximate age whom they knew well and liked. Both persons were rated on each of6O trait-descriptive adjectives, with a scale ranging from -3 to +3, plus four middle response options (average, depends on the situation, don't know, term unclear). After each of their trait ratings, subjects assessed the consistency of the person's behaviors associated with that trait. Analyses revealed a highly uniform pattern of self/other differences in the predicted direction: For 72% of the 60 traits, the majority of the subjects described themselves as more variable than the other person.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Goldberg, L. R. (1978). Differential attribution of trait-descriptive terms to oneself as compared to well-liked, neutral, and disliked others: A psychometric analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1012-1028.

Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Unconfounding situational attributions from uncertain, neutral, and ambiguous ones: A psychometric analysis of descriptions of oneself and various types of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 517-551.

Jones, E. E. (1976). How do people perceive the causes of behavior? American Scientist, 34, 300-305.

Jones, E. E. , & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones et al. (Eds.) Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

Kammer, D. (1982). Differences in trait ascriptions to self and friend: Unconfounding intensity from variability. Psychological Reports, 51, 99-102.

Kelley, H. H. , & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 457-501). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.

Nisbett, R. E. , Caputo, C. , Legant, P. , & Marecek, J. (1973). Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 154-164.

Nisbett, R. E. , & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Watson, D. (1982). The actor and the observer: How are their perceptions of causality divergent? Psychological Bulletin, 92, 682-700.